Most Emission-Efficient General Cargos
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
| # | Vessel | Size (DWT) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202 |
NIOVI.GR
IMO 9827322
|
34,730 | 2019 |
5.5
|
A |
| 201 |
BC PISTI
IMO 9851359
|
39,287 | 2019 |
5.5
|
A |
| 204 |
BERGE DAISETSU
IMO 9713179
|
34,533 | 2015 |
5.5
|
A |
| 203 |
NARIE
IMO 9767728
|
36,648 | 2018 |
5.5
|
A |
| 206 |
ASTRO PROPUS
IMO 9691498
|
38,271 | 2014 |
5.5
|
A |
| 205 |
PROPEL PROSPERITY
IMO 9317690
|
37,504 | 2006 |
5.5
|
A |
| 207 |
SAGA TUCANO
IMO 9160803
|
47,032 | 1998 |
5.5
|
A |
| 208 |
RIZABEY
IMO 9197117
|
24,999 | 1999 |
5.5
|
A |
| 209 |
POPLAR ARROW
IMO 9235141
|
47,852 | 2005 |
5.5
|
A |
| 210 |
ASTERIUS
IMO 9810769
|
33,358 | 2018 |
5.5
|
A |
| 211 |
OCEAN S
IMO 9086320
|
26,411 | 1996 |
5.6
|
A |
| 213 |
CETUS TIGER
IMO 9606003
|
37,059 | 2013 |
5.6
|
A |
| 212 |
SIBAL
IMO 9712620
|
33,364 | 2015 |
5.6
|
A |
| 214 |
WECO LAURA
IMO 9877327
|
38,575 | 2020 |
5.6
|
A |
| 215 |
HALOPHYLA
IMO 9613329
|
57,440 | 2013 |
5.6
|
A |
| 217 |
ELECTRA.GR
IMO 9834844
|
37,323 | 2019 |
5.6
|
A |
| 216 |
ASTRO POLARIS
IMO 9623051
|
37,054 | 2014 |
5.6
|
A |
| 218 |
ESRA C
IMO 9379662
|
33,257 | 2008 |
5.6
|
A |
| 220 |
DEVBULK BEGUM
IMO 9625607
|
30,124 | 2012 |
5.6
|
A |
| 219 |
SAGA NAVIGATOR
IMO 9371062
|
46,652 | 2007 |
5.6
|
A |
| 221 |
YUAN FU
IMO 9998030
|
61,646 | 2024 |
5.6
|
A |
| 222 |
ARACARI ARROW
IMO 9008706
|
46,956 | 1992 |
5.6
|
A |
| 223 |
LADY ANDRIANE
IMO 9832509
|
34,845 | 2020 |
5.6
|
A |
| 225 |
SAGA PIONEER
IMO 9380764
|
46,559 | 2008 |
5.7
|
A |
| 224 |
ARBORELLA
IMO 9613288
|
57,540 | 2012 |
5.7
|
A |
| 226 |
REGIUS
IMO 9737113
|
33,395 | 2016 |
5.7
|
A |
| 227 |
LADY MONICA
IMO 9392078
|
35,068 | 2009 |
5.7
|
A |
| 228 |
AVRA.GR
IMO 9755866
|
34,930 | 2016 |
5.7
|
A |
| 229 |
MANTA OMER MECIT
IMO 9737058
|
38,167 | 2015 |
5.7
|
A |
| 230 |
DEVBULK DEMET
IMO 9625592
|
30,124 | 2012 |
5.7
|
A |
| 231 |
NAGUAL
IMO 9380829
|
37,277 | 2008 |
5.7
|
A |
| 232 |
MANTA NILGUN
IMO 9553024
|
33,671 | 2011 |
5.7
|
A |
| 234 |
CENTURIUS
IMO 9712618
|
33,367 | 2015 |
5.7
|
A |
| 233 |
LJUTA
IMO 9672210
|
34,358 | 2014 |
5.7
|
A |
| 235 |
MANTA FATMA
IMO 9604809
|
38,243 | 2012 |
5.7
|
A |
| 237 |
IRMA S
IMO 9385063
|
32,295 | 2008 |
5.8
|
A |
| 236 |
PARLA
IMO 9537977
|
35,732 | 2011 |
5.8
|
A |
| 238 |
OCEAN ARSENAL
IMO 9635248
|
33,328 | 2013 |
5.8
|
A |
| 239 |
ARIA
IMO 9473597
|
32,216 | 2009 |
5.8
|
A |
| 242 |
IVS KESTREL
IMO 9700926
|
32,768 | 2014 |
5.8
|
A |
| 241 |
HYDRA DAWN
IMO 9607447
|
35,390 | 2013 |
5.8
|
A |
| 240 |
STAR LINDESNES
IMO 9593878
|
50,748 | 2013 |
5.8
|
A |
| 244 |
HOLLAND PEARL
IMO 9742455
|
45,224 | 2016 |
5.8
|
A |
| 243 |
FALCON S
IMO 9329423
|
37,406 | 2007 |
5.8
|
A |
| 245 |
PROPEL PASSION
IMO 9473676
|
33,686 | 2011 |
5.8
|
A |
| 246 |
DELICATA
IMO 9613317
|
57,441 | 2013 |
5.8
|
A |
| 248 |
OSAKANA
IMO 9253870
|
57,624 | 2004 |
5.8
|
A |
| 247 |
CHARISMA.GR
IMO 9834856
|
37,295 | 2019 |
5.8
|
A |
| 250 |
STAR DALMATIA
IMO 9548835
|
51,588 | 2011 |
5.8
|
A |
| 249 |
BRASSIANA
IMO 9613290
|
57,536 | 2012 |
5.8
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.