Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#559 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-30% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
555 SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
81,938 2013
3.3
A
554 AEOLIAN SUNRISE
IMO 9582544
81,793 2014
3.3
A
553 VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
81,886 2016
3.3
A
549 STAR SIRIUS
IMO 9520883
98,681 2011
3.3
A
551 CL SPRUCE
IMO 1021374
64,181 2025
3.3
A
550 LOTUS
IMO 9518098
82,224 2012
3.3
A
548 OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
82,024 2019
3.3
A
558 BASIC PASSION
IMO 1083425
82,073 2024
3.3
A
561 RIXTA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9598567
121,624 2011
3.3
A
560 PORT NARA
IMO 9965863
64,611 2021
3.3
A
559 CL LIANYUNGANG
IMO 9747302
81,058 2018
3.3
A
564 KLARA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9849007
81,262 2019
3.3
A
563 GOLDEN DAY
IMO 9209128
75,595 2000
3.3
A
562 GUO YUAN 12
IMO 9579250
75,946 2011
3.3
A
566 BW MATSUYAMA
IMO 9836488
81,810 2019
3.3
A
576 LENI
IMO 9362982
77,008 2008
3.3
A
565 ROYAL NEPTUNE
IMO 9851517
80,873 2020
3.3
A
567 SAKIZAYA QUEEN
IMO 9783148
81,858 2018
3.3
A
575 SANTA SOPHIA
IMO 9404766
106,498 2009
3.3
A
574 CRIMSON EMPRESS
IMO 9485021
82,250 2014
3.3
A
573 DARYA DEVI
IMO 9627760
81,930 2013
3.3
A
572 EREIKOUSSA
IMO 9591739
178,896 2012
3.3
A
571 FRATERNELLE
IMO 9693422
82,086 2016
3.3
A
570 NORD TITAN
IMO 9701164
77,095 2014
3.3
A
569 PORT OSHIMA
IMO 9932804
64,624 2021
3.3
A
568 RB JORDANA
IMO 9730816
81,301 2016
3.3
A
580 BTG BALFOUR
IMO 9952452
82,245 2024
3.3
A
579 CHARIKLIA JUNIOR
IMO 9548201
92,932 2011
3.3
A
581 DAISY GLORY
IMO 9847853
82,058 2019
3.3
A
578 KEY HUNTER
IMO 9461312
82,099 2011
3.3
A
585 PORT ORIENT
IMO 9735103
61,485 2013
3.3
A
584 SASEBO GLORY
IMO 9740823
85,020 2016
3.3
A
582 AQUILA OCEAN
IMO 9825520
82,071 2015
3.3
A
577 MELTEMI
IMO 9952402
82,206 2022
3.3
A
583 BULK GREECE
IMO 9851323
81,606 2019
3.3
A
586 JIN HAI RUN
IMO 1043827
63,907 2025
3.3
A
589 PROGRESS TRADER
IMO 9936769
82,231 2022
3.3
A
592 SAKIZAYA FUTURE
IMO 9713818
81,560 2016
3.3
A
588 CORNALIN
IMO 9947263
82,403 2023
3.3
A
594 KANKO MARU
IMO 9950911
82,325 2022
3.3
A
593 RGL FIRST
IMO 9772864
82,215 2017
3.3
A
587 SSI CONSTELLATION
IMO 1039967
64,608 2025
3.3
A
591 STORMHARBOUR
IMO 9519157
76,583 2009
3.3
A
590 FABULOUS DIVA
IMO 9984558
63,711 2024
3.3
A
600 ARCHON
IMO 9828948
82,084 2018
3.3
A
599 S RUMBA
IMO 9712498
84,867 2013
3.3
A
598 STAR CAPOEIRA
IMO 9719537
81,253 2015
3.3
A
597 GALAPAGOS
IMO 9473169
75,661 2010
3.3
A
596 SHANDONG XIN SHUN
IMO 1026544
82,135 2025
3.3
A
595 AFFINITY DIVA
IMO 9919917
88,993 2022
3.3
A
Page 12 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.