Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,122 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-19% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1103 EQUINOX SOFRANO
IMO 9860221
61,056 2019
3.8
B
1105 XIN HAI TONG 23
IMO 9453236
56,708 2010
3.8
B
1102 STAR WESTPORT
IMO 9705988
63,334 2015
3.8
B
1107 EPSON TRADER
IMO 9872963
62,661 2021
3.8
B
1106 EASTERN JUNIPER
IMO 9922251
61,185 2022
3.8
B
1101 PAMPERO
IMO 9426104
93,275 2011
3.8
B
1104 YILDIZLAR 3
IMO 9370795
49,507 2008
3.8
B
1108 GIORGIS
IMO 9619775
82,566 2014
3.8
B
1111 GREEN K-MAX 4
IMO 9838084
80,891 2020
3.8
B
1120 SPRING JASMINE
IMO 9942079
63,441 2023
3.8
B
1110 LACERTA
IMO 9512367
82,265 2012
3.8
B
1121 ANTIPAROS
IMO 9600657
81,572 2012
3.8
B
1109 FJ BIANCA
IMO 9866172
81,750 2020
3.8
B
1112 FANTASEA
IMO 9342827
76,596 2006
3.8
B
1119 KAVO YERAKI
IMO 9286607
82,926 2006
3.8
B
1118 LOWLANDS FUTURE
IMO 9799771
60,063 2017
3.8
B
1117 FEDERAL INTEGRITY
IMO 9933066
63,729 2023
3.8
B
1116 ALBATROSS ISLAND
IMO 9421439
61,414 2010
3.8
B
1115 SIBONEY M
IMO 9875018
81,621 2020
3.8
B
1114 AQUA LADY
IMO 9288435
76,492 2004
3.8
B
1113 EXELIXSEA
IMO 9476953
76,361 2011
3.8
B
1123 CL BEIJING
IMO 9649299
81,700 2013
3.8
B
1122 CMB JORDAENS
IMO 9860635
63,447 2019
3.8
B
1127 XH HOPE
IMO 9877925
84,998 2022
3.8
B
1129 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.8
B
1126 XIN JI XING
IMO 9256872
76,015 2004
3.8
B
1131 BSM FANGCHENG
IMO 9863819
63,674 2020
3.8
B
1130 MAHA YAYA
IMO 9525613
84,108 2013
3.8
B
1125 YASA SATURN
IMO 9848144
61,075 2019
3.8
B
1124 ASKIO
IMO 9848649
63,464 2020
3.8
B
1128 NECKLACE
IMO 9548225
92,903 2012
3.8
B
1134 RED ORCHID
IMO 9757890
61,645 2015
3.9
B
1133 SAVITA NAREE
IMO 9726437
62,971 2016
3.9
B
1135 ZERMATT
IMO 9634830
82,026 2013
3.9
B
1132 CASSIOPEIA OCEAN
IMO 9837286
81,700 2018
3.9
B
1138 AMIS WISDOM VI
IMO 9589803
61,456 2011
3.9
B
1139 BULK COURAGEOUS
IMO 9659919
61,393 2013
3.9
B
1137 SM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9842499
80,897 2019
3.9
B
1142 GLBS MIGHT
IMO 9972804
64,166 2024
3.9
B
1141 FEDERAL ILLINOIS
IMO 9860647
63,386 2019
3.9
B
1140 GERTRUDE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9727601
80,959 2016
3.9
B
1136 RI GUAN FENG
IMO 9523146
75,565 2010
3.9
B
1143 SEAHUNTER
IMO 9974424
63,253 2024
3.9
B
1150 ULTRALAZ
IMO 9781085
64,043 2018
3.9
B
1149 SSI VIGILANT
IMO 9918743
63,861 2022
3.9
B
1148 CHLOE
IMO 9749910
81,629 2014
3.9
B
1147 GENOA
IMO 9805659
60,396 2017
3.9
B
1146 BEAUTY JASMINE
IMO 9721334
63,638 2015
3.9
B
1145 LEONARDO
IMO 9894777
63,676 2020
3.9
B
1144 ARETHUSA
IMO 9855563
81,541 2020
3.9
B
Page 23 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.