Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#385 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-34% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
348 SAKIZAYA MIRACLE
IMO 9768019
81,668 2017
3.1
A
353 HSL VEGAS
IMO 9928372
81,981 2022
3.1
A
352 RAIATEA
IMO 9580376
178,861 2011
3.1
A
356 RICHLAND SINGAPORE
IMO 9929039
82,037 2022
3.1
A
355 ADMIRAL JIMMU
IMO 9884617
83,100 2020
3.1
A
354 RIK OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463657
121,290 2011
3.1
A
357 MACHERAS
IMO 9698850
81,000 2015
3.1
A
361 ACRUX AMELIA
IMO 9909194
82,577 2021
3.1
A
364 QC PUNNY
IMO 9984522
63,425 2024
3.1
A
360 SHINE PEARL
IMO 9971496
82,427 2024
3.1
A
363 YASA PLUTO
IMO 1014670
64,009 2025
3.1
A
359 KYPROS SEA
IMO 9675602
77,128 2014
3.1
A
358 LINDEN TRADER
IMO 9867578
82,226 2021
3.1
A
362 TOMAHAWK
IMO 9737591
82,056 2017
3.1
A
365 YM PACIFICO
IMO 9544102
81,812 2015
3.1
A
368 AP DUBROVNIK
IMO 9952660
82,249 2023
3.1
A
367 GOLDEN WAVE
IMO 9977153
85,000 2022
3.1
A
366 GLBS GIGI
IMO 9623738
81,817 2014
3.1
A
374 FEI YUN JIANG
IMO 9990820
64,725 2024
3.1
A
372 NEW HYDRA
IMO 9579781
179,258 2011
3.1
A
373 CL ZHENJIANG
IMO 9728801
81,121 2019
3.1
A
370 STAR SOPHIA
IMO 9361201
82,295 2007
3.1
A
371 ZY IDOL
IMO 1016472
64,675 2025
3.1
A
369 PARTNERSHIP
IMO 9597848
179,213 2010
3.1
A
384 PORT KOBE
IMO 9767534
63,520 2016
3.1
A
375 VITALITY DIVA
IMO 9951903
63,665 2023
3.1
A
383 NORD TAURUS
IMO 9782182
81,718 2016
3.1
A
382 DOUKATO
IMO 9840659
85,123 2014
3.1
A
381 ROSTRUM SCEPTIC
IMO 9955923
82,191 2024
3.1
A
380 ANNA J
IMO 9929340
82,279 2022
3.1
A
379 SEACON SHANGHAI
IMO 9847889
80,811 2019
3.1
A
378 MICHELANGELO
IMO 1030820
82,009 2025
3.1
A
377 MINT
IMO 9861081
82,015 2020
3.1
A
376 AM SHRADDHA
IMO 9837004
81,754 2019
3.1
A
385 SWANSEA
IMO 9966570
90,023 2021
3.1
A
386 BW NARA
IMO 9836373
81,759 2020
3.1
A
389 CRIMSON KINGDOM
IMO 9748033
84,860 2016
3.1
A
388 KEY SONORITY
IMO 9836359
81,691 2020
3.1
A
387 MARAN GLORY
IMO 9434383
180,575 2012
3.1
A
391 GIRASOLE RIVER
IMO 9882322
81,982 2020
3.1
A
390 ZHONG MENG HANG LIAN
IMO 9260122
74,832 2001
3.1
A
394 CECI
IMO 9340544
82,338 2009
3.1
A
398 CEMTEX RENAISSANCE
IMO 9599119
98,681 2011
3.1
A
397 STAR EXPLORER
IMO 9989948
82,362 2024
3.1
A
396 SHINE AMBER
IMO 9971458
82,406 2023
3.1
A
395 BH POWER
IMO 1024649
82,197 2023
3.1
A
393 CARLTON TRADER
IMO 9937567
82,237 2023
3.1
A
392 NORSE PROGRESS
IMO 9964871
66,312 2024
3.1
A
400 MEDI AMALFI
IMO 9781982
87,605 2017
3.1
A
399 STAR LYDIA
IMO 9673795
81,187 2013
3.1
A
Page 8 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.