Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#171 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-44% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
151 STENA PRO PATRIA
IMO 9899727
49,990 2022
5.2
A
152 ST GEORGE
IMO 9412775
50,651 2010
5.2
A
155 HAFNIA KIRSTEN
IMO 9732682
49,999 2017
5.2
A
154 ECOMAR GASCOGNE
IMO 1029261
49,776 2025
5.2
A
153 SILVER EMILY
IMO 9682356
49,746 2012
5.2
A
157 JUPITER STAR
IMO 9919632
50,434 2021
5.2
A
156 CYPRESS SUN
IMO 9911551
49,999 2023
5.2
A
158 OINOUSSIAN STAR
IMO 9827578
49,999 2018
5.2
A
159 HAFNIA VIRIDIAN
IMO 9690614
49,126 2015
5.2
A
160 NORD MARINER
IMO 9941300
49,999 2023
5.2
A
161 STENA CONQUEST
IMO 1013963
49,948 2025
5.2
A
163 LONE STAR MARINER
IMO 9902859
50,177 2021
5.2
A
162 BLUE BUTTERFLY
IMO 9788576
49,995 2019
5.2
A
164 AVENCA
IMO 9410002
51,237 2008
5.2
A
165 STENA IMPORTANT
IMO 9667497
49,731 2015
5.2
A
168 TORM TROILUS
IMO 9726475
49,757 2016
5.2
A
167 SOLAR CHERYL
IMO 9898503
49,390 2021
5.2
A
166 STI MIGHTY
IMO 9854739
47,499 2018
5.2
A
170 NORD VANQUISH
IMO 9833058
50,338 2017
5.2
A
169 SOLAR RUO YUN
IMO 9907811
49,362 2021
5.2
A
172 NAVIG8 GRACE
IMO 9833656
49,804 2019
5.2
A
171 NORD VIRAGE
IMO 9944132
50,378 2022
5.2
A
173 SEAWAYS WARWICK
IMO 9717761
49,990 2015
5.3
A
175 CLEAROCEAN MAGIC
IMO 9849382
49,995 2019
5.3
A
174 LUCKY CHEMIST
IMO 9686742
49,990 2015
5.3
A
178 HIGH NAVIGATOR
IMO 9814143
49,921 2018
5.3
A
177 MADHA SILVER
IMO 9718818
45,923 2016
5.3
A
176 CAPE AVANTI
IMO 9995430
50,516 2025
5.3
A
179 DANK SILVER
IMO 9718806
49,734 2013
5.3
A
181 BOW TRIDENT
IMO 9669897
49,622 2014
5.3
A
180 ZAHRA
IMO 9917866
55,202 2022
5.3
A
182 CATHERINE GRACE
IMO 9724611
50,099 2013
5.3
A
183 MAHADAH SILVER
IMO 9718777
45,923 2016
5.3
A
185 SOLAR SUSIE
IMO 9898515
49,360 2021
5.3
A
184 STI MODEST
IMO 9833577
49,999 2017
5.3
A
190 ECO YOSEMITE PARK
IMO 9877573
49,999 2020
5.3
A
189 NORD MAVERICK
IMO 9877559
50,185 2020
5.3
A
188 YASA SWAN
IMO 9857248
50,215 2019
5.3
A
187 TORM AMALIE
IMO 9466025
49,999 2011
5.3
A
186 STI MILLENNIA
IMO 9829497
47,499 2017
5.3
A
191 TORM LENE
IMO 9390769
53,143 2008
5.3
A
192 TORM DAVAO
IMO 9688350
49,990 2012
5.3
A
193 NAVIG8 EXPRESS
IMO 9976874
49,153 2024
5.3
A
196 FPMC 36
IMO 9845180
49,721 2020
5.3
A
195 NAVIG8 GALLANTRY
IMO 9833668
49,759 2019
5.3
A
194 NORD MATE
IMO 1013949
49,999 2025
5.3
A
199 AL AMERAT
IMO 9405851
51,022 2008
5.4
A
198 ECOMAR GUYENNE
IMO 1029273
49,776 2025
5.4
A
197 HIGH TRUST
IMO 9696254
49,990 2016
5.4
A
200 SILVER ORLA
IMO 9682332
49,746 2014
5.4
A
Page 4 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.