Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,230 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
17.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+76% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1201 BDP SPIRIT
IMO 9424053
15,203 2009
16.4
E
1202 ELISALEX SCHULTE
IMO 9439876
16,427 2006
16.4
E
1203 NQ TULIPA
IMO 9312406
8,908 2004
16.4
E
1204 DUZGIT ENDEAVOUR
IMO 9581007
15,995 2013
16.4
E
1205 GALATIA KA
IMO 9265378
15,267 2003
16.5
E
1206 TERNVIND
IMO 9425356
11,258 2008
16.5
E
1207 AVIVA
IMO 9410131
19,999 2008
16.6
E
1208 KATTEGAT
IMO 9432866
11,299 2008
16.6
E
1209 SATURNUS
IMO 9816529
7,998 2018
16.6
E
1210 LOKHOLMEN
IMO 9433303
16,866 2007
16.6
E
1211 MERCURIUS
IMO 9816531
7,998 2019
16.8
E
1212 SEA DUCK
IMO 9443839
12,966 2007
16.8
E
1213 BISCAY
IMO 9474450
11,161 2008
16.9
E
1214 DONIA
IMO 9442914
7,701 2008
16.9
E
1215 FERICEK
IMO 9125267
10,106 1996
16.9
E
1216 TELLUS
IMO 9321615
9,181 2006
17.0
E
1217 BALTIC
IMO 9451226
11,253 2020
17.0
E
1218 SIGRID THERESA
IMO 9392183
8,139 2008
17.1
E
1219 FMT URLA
IMO 9458054
14,355 2010
17.1
E
1220 CHEMICAL VOYAGER
IMO 9330379
14,246 2005
17.1
E
1221 NQ VICTORIA
IMO 9344174
8,824 2006
17.2
E
1222 SONGA RUBY
IMO 9444479
17,604 2008
17.2
E
1223 ATA OCEAN
IMO 9373929
9,942 2007
17.3
E
1224 KIRKEHOLMEN
IMO 9553402
17,136 2010
17.3
E
1225 AMUR STAR
IMO 9480368
13,019 2010
17.3
E
1226 MRC LINA
IMO 9462299
8,280 2009
17.4
E
1227 SELENKA
IMO 9447067
10,745 2009
17.4
E
1228 SONGA TAURUS
IMO 9373644
16,611 2009
17.4
E
1229 LOTSTELLA
IMO 9832121
7,988 2018
17.5
E
1230 MONJASA HUNTER
IMO 9478286
7,858 2009
17.5
E
1231 KAPIDAG
IMO 9034731
8,674 1992
17.5
E
1232 LIVATYA
IMO 9291444
8,817 2004
17.5
E
1233 WINTER
IMO 9416800
13,026 2009
17.5
E
1234 ESSEX STAR
IMO 9348297
16,744 2007
17.6
E
1235 AYSENAZ
IMO 9034743
9,108 1993
17.6
E
1236 ANNELIESE ESSBERGER
IMO 9295426
8,648 2005
17.6
E
1237 BERGSTRAUM
IMO 9108740
9,494 1996
17.6
E
1238 CAROLINE THERESA
IMO 9428449
7,884 2009
17.7
E
1239 CYAN ORCA
IMO 9542908
9,131 2007
17.7
E
1240 OWL 3
IMO 9332494
13,153 2008
17.8
E
1241 SEA LIGHT
IMO 9428023
12,948 2009
17.8
E
1242 ILHAN BAYRAK
IMO 9956434
8,116 2023
17.8
E
1243 SONGA AURORA
IMO 9373632
16,651 2008
17.8
E
1244 JBU OPAL
IMO 9400409
19,864 2009
17.9
E
1245 SONGA ATLANTIC
IMO 9447328
17,999 2010
17.9
E
1246 TARNBRIS
IMO 9372652
11,288 2007
17.9
E
1247 HULIN
IMO 9447043
10,745 2008
17.9
E
1248 PECHORA STAR
IMO 9488322
13,021 2011
18.0
E
1249 MONA SWAN
IMO 9371804
11,348 2006
18.0
E
1250 JETTE THERESA
IMO 9406582
11,383 2009
18.0
E
Page 25 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.