Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#126 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-47% greener
A

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
104 YASA VEGA
IMO 9888352
50,215 2021
5.1
A
102 SILVER ELLIE
IMO 9692387
49,950 2015
5.1
A
101 NAVIG8 ESTELLE
IMO 9973925
49,155 2024
5.1
A
103 HAFNIA MIKALA
IMO 9732709
49,999 2017
5.1
A
108 SEADRIVE
IMO 9934137
50,394 2021
5.2
A
107 TAKAROA SUN
IMO 9850202
49,849 2019
5.2
A
106 SOLAR RUBA
IMO 9907768
49,367 2021
5.2
A
105 CASTARA
IMO 9834155
50,620 2019
5.2
A
109 CHIOS STAR
IMO 9827566
50,506 2018
5.2
A
111 PS ROMA
IMO 9510462
51,063 2011
5.2
A
110 MATRAH
IMO 9405849
51,021 2008
5.2
A
112 MADHA SILVER
IMO 9718818
45,923 2016
5.2
A
113 CLEAROCEAN MAGIC
IMO 9849382
49,995 2019
5.2
A
115 LARGO DESERT
IMO 9828912
49,703 2018
5.2
A
114 HIGH CHALLENGE
IMO 9740586
49,990 2017
5.2
A
116 NORD SWIFT
IMO 9692155
49,579 2015
5.2
A
117 ELKA ATHINA
IMO 9249116
101,970 2004
5.2
A
118 AMIRANTE
IMO 9629706
49,994 2013
5.2
A
119 STI MAVERICK
IMO 9833589
49,999 2019
5.2
A
120 SKYLIGHT
IMO 9396737
50,926 2008
5.2
A
122 JUPITER STAR
IMO 9919632
50,434 2021
5.2
A
121 STI MAXIMUS
IMO 9854741
49,999 2020
5.2
A
125 AMFITRION
IMO 9724623
50,102 2017
5.2
A
124 NORD VANTAGE
IMO 9830252
50,550 2018
5.2
A
123 DORIC BREEZE
IMO 9637129
51,565 2013
5.2
A
126 STI BRONX
IMO 9706839
49,990 2015
5.2
A
127 SEAWAYS OLIVE
IMO 9354909
49,999 2008
5.3
A
128 MP MR TANKER 1
IMO 9472763
51,755 2011
5.3
A
130 PAG
IMO 9440514
49,990 2015
5.3
A
129 TABLE BAY
IMO 9974979
50,000 2024
5.3
A
133 CAPE ANDIAMO
IMO 9995428
50,502 2024
5.3
A
132 MURMURE
IMO 9939618
49,999 2025
5.3
A
131 HAFNIA LEO
IMO 9476824
49,999 2013
5.3
A
134 HAFNIA LIBRA
IMO 9617959
52,385 2013
5.3
A
136 ACACIA
IMO 9747352
49,999 2017
5.3
A
135 ARDMORE SEAFOX
IMO 9708215
49,999 2015
5.3
A
137 ZOILO
IMO 9704441
49,990 2015
5.3
A
138 LEIKANGER
IMO 9725304
49,999 2016
5.3
A
139 CLEAROCEAN MESQUITE
IMO 9919163
49,999 2021
5.3
A
140 CS ZHE JIANG
IMO 9899478
47,497 2022
5.3
A
141 MERSEY
IMO 9865752
49,999 2019
5.4
A
142 LARGO ENERGY
IMO 9683984
49,973 2014
5.4
A
143 ION M
IMO 9864344
49,999 2019
5.4
A
144 DEE4 MAHOGANY
IMO 9942500
44,999 2022
5.4
A
145 PACIFIC BLUE
IMO 9867798
49,995 2020
5.4
A
148 SEAWAYS WAVE
IMO 9387918
51,549 2009
5.4
A
147 NAVIG8 EXECUTIVE
IMO 9973937
49,143 2024
5.4
A
146 POLARIS
IMO 9682459
49,126 2014
5.4
A
149 NORD VENTURA
IMO 9910337
49,999 2021
5.4
A
150 ARDMORE SEAVANGUARD
IMO 9637088
51,800 2014
5.4
A
Page 3 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.