Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#126 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-47% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 HAFNIA MIKALA
IMO 9732709
49,999 2017
5.1
A
104 PM MONARCH
IMO 9365001
76,543 2007
5.1
A
103 NAVIG8 ESTELLE
IMO 9973925
49,155 2024
5.1
A
102 YASA VEGA
IMO 9888352
50,215 2021
5.1
A
108 SEADRIVE
IMO 9934137
50,394 2021
5.2
A
107 TAKAROA SUN
IMO 9850202
49,849 2019
5.2
A
106 SOLAR RUBA
IMO 9907768
49,367 2021
5.2
A
105 CASTARA
IMO 9834155
50,620 2019
5.2
A
109 CHIOS STAR
IMO 9827566
50,506 2018
5.2
A
110 MATRAH
IMO 9405849
51,021 2008
5.2
A
111 CLEAROCEAN MAGIC
IMO 9849382
49,995 2019
5.2
A
112 MADHA SILVER
IMO 9718818
45,923 2016
5.2
A
113 SILVER ELLIE
IMO 9692387
49,635 2015
5.2
A
115 HIGH CHALLENGE
IMO 9740586
49,990 2017
5.2
A
114 LARGO DESERT
IMO 9828912
49,703 2018
5.2
A
116 NORD SWIFT
IMO 9692155
49,579 2015
5.2
A
117 ELKA ATHINA
IMO 9249116
101,970 2001
5.2
A
118 AMIRANTE
IMO 9629706
49,994 2013
5.2
A
119 STI MAVERICK
IMO 9833589
49,999 2017
5.2
A
120 JUPITER STAR
IMO 9919632
50,434 2021
5.2
A
122 STI MAXIMUS
IMO 9854741
49,999 2018
5.2
A
121 SKYLIGHT
IMO 9396737
50,927 2008
5.2
A
125 AMFITRION
IMO 9724623
50,102 2017
5.2
A
124 NORD VANTAGE
IMO 9830252
50,550 2017
5.2
A
123 DORIC BREEZE
IMO 9637129
51,565 2013
5.2
A
126 STI BRONX
IMO 9706839
49,990 2015
5.2
A
127 SEAWAYS OLIVE
IMO 9354909
49,999 2008
5.3
A
128 PS ROMA
IMO 9510462
49,999 2011
5.3
A
129 MP MR TANKER 1
IMO 9472763
51,755 2011
5.3
A
131 CAPE ANDIAMO
IMO 9995428
50,502 2024
5.3
A
130 TABLE BAY
IMO 9974979
49,999 2024
5.3
A
132 HAFNIA LEO
IMO 9476824
49,999 2013
5.3
A
134 MURMURE
IMO 9939618
49,999 2024
5.3
A
133 PAG
IMO 9440514
49,990 2015
5.3
A
136 ZOILO
IMO 9704441
49,990 2015
5.3
A
138 HAFNIA LIBRA
IMO 9617959
52,385 2013
5.3
A
135 ACACIA
IMO 9747352
49,999 2017
5.3
A
137 ARDMORE SEAFOX
IMO 9708215
49,999 2015
5.3
A
139 LEIKANGER
IMO 9725304
49,999 2016
5.3
A
140 CLEAROCEAN MESQUITE
IMO 9919163
49,999 2021
5.3
A
141 CS ZHE JIANG
IMO 9899478
47,497 2022
5.3
A
142 MERSEY
IMO 9865752
49,999 2019
5.4
A
144 DEE4 MAHOGANY
IMO 9942500
44,999 2022
5.4
A
145 LARGO ENERGY
IMO 9683984
49,973 2014
5.4
A
143 ION M
IMO 9864344
49,999 2019
5.4
A
146 PACIFIC BLUE
IMO 9867798
49,995 2020
5.4
A
149 NAVIG8 EXECUTIVE
IMO 9973937
49,143 2024
5.4
A
148 SEAWAYS WAVE
IMO 9387918
51,549 2009
5.4
A
147 POLARIS
IMO 9682459
49,126 2014
5.4
A
150 NORD VENTURA
IMO 9910337
49,999 2021
5.4
A
Page 3 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.