Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#959 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
10.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+9% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 CHEM ARGON
IMO 9716004
19,993 2016
10.2
D
952 ORIONIS
IMO 9400370
19,935 2009
10.2
D
953 ORIENTAL HIBISCUS
IMO 9908334
16,223 2021
10.2
D
954 CAN KA
IMO 9312925
37,582 2006
10.2
D
955 KRITI ADMIRAL
IMO 9314870
37,266 2007
10.2
D
956 CLEAN SANCTUARY
IMO 9430260
46,121 2009
10.2
D
957 CHEM SILICON
IMO 9829681
19,977 2018
10.2
D
958 MAGIC STAR
IMO 9420253
38,423 2009
10.2
D
959 ORCHID SYLT
IMO 9367413
21,206 2009
10.2
D
960 CHEM MIA
IMO 9407093
19,702 2008
10.2
D
961 TG LIBRA
IMO 9724099
19,822 2016
10.3
D
962 SAEHAN NURIA
IMO 9577185
21,290 2010
10.3
D
963 EVA RICHWAY
IMO 9986025
19,906 2024
10.3
D
964 TERN LAND
IMO 9988994
15,023 2025
10.3
D
965 STOLT CREATIVITY
IMO 9102095
37,271 1997
10.3
D
966 ALFRED N
IMO 9749324
25,161 2014
10.3
D
967 SH FREESIA
IMO 9505986
19,991 2011
10.3
D
968 STROMBOLI M
IMO 9595137
37,583 2011
10.3
D
969 HAZAR
IMO 9290830
37,270 2005
10.3
D
970 TIVOLI PARK
IMO 9780536
19,994 2018
10.3
D
971 WISDOM STAR
IMO 9278674
34,528 2003
10.3
D
972 MARVEA
IMO 9301897
39,999 2006
10.3
D
973 GINGA BOBCAT
IMO 9472737
25,954 2010
10.4
D
974 FLOYEN
IMO 9749790
19,998 2016
10.4
D
975 AAPUS 11
IMO 9508158
19,814 2008
10.4
D
976 HTM SAMURAI
IMO 9595125
37,583 2011
10.4
D
977 CHEM SINGAPORE
IMO 9705768
19,996 2015
10.4
D
978 THUN LIDKOPING
IMO 9828974
18,684 2019
10.4
D
979 TERN SEA
IMO 9747974
14,878 2016
10.4
D
980 LOYAL
IMO 9345881
23,322 2006
10.4
D
981 EAST COAST
IMO 9298703
37,515 2005
10.4
D
982 MAGIC WAND
IMO 9379143
46,754 2007
10.5
D
983 REINHOLD SCHULTE
IMO 9576789
25,583 2012
10.5
D
984 CHEM LITHIUM
IMO 9815252
19,981 2017
10.5
D
985 INDIGO RAY
IMO 9716016
19,989 2016
10.5
D
986 LAVRAKI
IMO 9323077
20,811 2007
10.5
D
987 DELPHI
IMO 9283796
37,432 2004
10.5
D
988 EVA FUJI
IMO 9914242
19,891 2021
10.6
D
989 MTM NORTH SOUND
IMO 9360946
19,874 2006
10.6
D
990 VELOS RUBINI
IMO 9455052
36,677 2010
10.6
D
991 THUN LIVERPOOL
IMO 9828998
18,684 2019
10.6
D
992 ERDEK
IMO 9175767
10,307 1998
10.6
D
993 RUDOLF SCHULTE
IMO 9576765
25,581 2011
10.6
D
994 STOLT INSPIRATION
IMO 9102083
37,205 1997
10.6
D
995 CHEM AMSTERDAM
IMO 9640138
19,801 2013
10.6
D
996 BRONX
IMO 9391414
37,602 2008
10.6
D
997 ATHENIAN HORIZON
IMO 1026635
18,340 2025
10.6
D
998 SHAMROCK MERCURY
IMO 9477531
19,998 2010
10.6
D
999 CHEMICAL FIGHTER
IMO 9900459
15,950 2020
10.6
D
1000 PVT AZURA
IMO 9423683
19,945 2009
10.7
D
Page 20 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.