Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#867 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-22% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 EAGLE HANOVER
IMO 9398723
114,014 2010
4.0
C
852 ASAHI PRINCESS
IMO 9411197
105,372 2009
4.0
C
853 ECOMAR GARONNE
IMO 1029285
49,695 2025
4.0
C
854 STI SELATAR
IMO 9729245
109,999 2017
4.0
C
855 PSERIMOS
IMO 9578658
158,670 2011
4.0
C
856 MINERVA ARIES
IMO 9412177
105,483 2006
4.0
C
857 LUNARIA
IMO 9901063
111,076 2019
4.0
C
858 UNITY VENTURE
IMO 9773739
112,186 2017
4.0
C
859 SEBAROK SPIRIT
IMO 9572264
109,554 2008
4.0
C
860 ASP TREASURES
IMO 9732242
115,063 2016
4.0
C
861 STI STABILITY
IMO 9712840
109,999 2013
4.0
C
862 AMFITRITI
IMO 9419369
115,404 2006
4.0
C
863 GHIBLI
IMO 9417799
112,961 2006
4.0
C
864 ANWAAR BENGHAZI
IMO 9888742
114,077 2021
4.0
C
865 KOS
IMO 1024950
115,026 2023
4.0
C
866 KING PHILIPPOS
IMO 9601194
111,827 2010
4.0
C
867 MINERVA OLYMPIA
IMO 9787194
114,780 2015
4.1
C
868 ALFRED
IMO 9826897
113,159 2018
4.1
C
869 GLORIA MARIS
IMO 9899997
156,620 2021
4.1
C
870 CSK VANGUARD
IMO 9728423
114,667 2013
4.1
C
871 MAERSK CRETE
IMO 9786190
49,919 2019
4.1
C
872 KARAVAS
IMO 9420631
107,505 2010
4.1
C
873 DUBAI BRILLIANCE
IMO 9422550
115,617 2011
4.1
C
874 WAVE
IMO 9937012
113,841 2023
4.1
C
875 STI KINGSWAY
IMO 9712852
109,999 2015
4.1
C
876 STI GOAL
IMO 9717125
109,999 2016
4.1
C
877 PETALIDI
IMO 9529475
158,531 2008
4.1
C
878 JATULI
IMO 9892444
112,459 2021
4.1
C
879 PHILOTIMOS
IMO 9793997
113,247 2018
4.1
C
880 AURORA SPIRIT
IMO 9837169
129,632 2020
4.1
C
881 IONIC ASPIS
IMO 9523287
107,508 2011
4.1
C
882 EAGLE PAULINIA
IMO 9858565
153,352 2020
4.1
C
883 LANCING
IMO 9792046
104,074 2018
4.1
C
884 DELTA KANARIS
IMO 9429015
157,563 2010
4.1
C
885 ANTIPOLIS
IMO 9792204
73,981 2018
4.1
C
886 COPENHAGEN STAR
IMO 9995985
115,382 2022
4.1
C
887 RAYSUT
IMO 9402225
99,995 2009
4.1
C
888 ALPES
IMO 9817470
112,504 2018
4.1
C
889 ELLIE LADY
IMO 9390173
109,999 2009
4.1
C
890 SUEZ ICE SUPREME
IMO 9296418
146,356 2007
4.1
C
891 PROPONTIS
IMO 9305623
117,055 2006
4.1
C
892 PVT POSEIDON
IMO 9457593
114,542 2006
4.2
C
893 ASPEN
IMO 9818058
112,459 2019
4.2
C
894 MAERSK CURACAO
IMO 9786205
49,919 2019
4.2
C
895 FRONT ANTARES
IMO 9745926
111,059 2014
4.2
C
896 MINERVA ZOE
IMO 9800568
109,900 2019
4.2
C
897 OHIO
IMO 9417440
105,188 2009
4.2
C
898 BUALA
IMO 9433585
115,592 2010
4.2
C
899 LARGO EAGLE
IMO 9935911
49,999 2022
4.2
C
900 ADVANTAGE PORTOFINO
IMO 9794836
75,343 2018
4.2
C
Page 18 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.