Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,385 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-1% greener
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 ZIM ATLANTIC
IMO 9440801
4,255 TEU 2009
9.5
D
1352 JPO LIBRA
IMO 9297840
4,132 TEU 2005
9.5
D
1353 DERBY D
IMO 9278117
4,253 TEU 2004
9.6
D
1354 MAERSK JABAL
IMO 9343077
2,824 TEU 2005
9.6
D
1355 VENTO DI MAESTRALE
IMO 9985021
1,800 TEU 2015
9.6
D
1356 MAERSK NARMADA
IMO 9356098
2,478 TEU 2008
9.6
D
1357 MSC CADIZ
IMO 9480203
5,550 TEU 2011
9.6
D
1358 MSC KILIMANJARO IV
IMO 9318175
3,853 TEU 2006
9.6
D
1359 MAERSK DENVER
IMO 9332999
6,188 TEU 2007
9.6
D
1360 MSC KERRY VII
IMO 9221815
6,446 TEU 2001
9.6
D
1361 NAVIOS AZURE
IMO 9324851
4,250 TEU 2007
9.6
D
1362 CAPE CORFU
IMO 9857432
2,708 TEU 2021
9.6
D
1363 CMA CGM MALTA
IMO 9301433
2,556 TEU 2004
9.7
D
1364 MSC GIANNA III
IMO 9152856
2,825 TEU 1998
9.7
D
1365 CMA CGM SALAMANQUE
IMO 9961348
2,000 TEU 2024
9.7
D
1366 JOLLY CLIVIA
IMO 9444417
4,400 TEU 2010
9.7
D
1367 MSC CORNELIA
IMO 9426817
5,100 TEU 2010
9.7
D
1368 MAERSK BROWNSVILLE
IMO 9313955
4,196 TEU 2007
9.7
D
1369 LICA MAERSK
IMO 9190779
3,700 TEU 2001
9.7
D
1370 CMA CGM OSAKA
IMO 9400291
4,250 TEU 2008
9.7
D
1371 SINE A
IMO 9343089
2,824 TEU 2005
9.7
D
1372 SEASPAN LIMA
IMO 9386005
2,500 TEU 2008
9.7
D
1373 SM SEOUL
IMO 9456953
4,255 TEU 2010
9.7
D
1374 MSC GRENADA III
IMO 9275373
2,246 TEU 2003
9.7
D
1375 EMMA A
IMO 9308194
2,800 TEU 2007
9.7
D
1376 MSC YORK VII
IMO 9196838
6,420 TEU 2000
9.8
D
1377 MSC VIGO
IMO 9480227
5,550 TEU 2012
9.8
D
1378 SPIRIT OF SINGAPORE
IMO 9362396
3,752 TEU 2007
9.8
D
1379 MSC ALIX 3
IMO 9166651
2,452 TEU 1998
9.8
D
1380 VENTO DI GRECALE
IMO 9985045
24,440 2024
9.8
D
1381 NORDMAAS
IMO 9822736
1,800 TEU 2019
9.8
D
1382 OOCL MONTREAL
IMO 9253739
4,402 TEU 2003
9.8
D
1383 CMA CGM CEBU
IMO 9362736
1,794 TEU 2008
9.8
D
1384 VENTO DI BORA
IMO 9950064
1,900 TEU 2023
9.8
D
1385 ALGECIRAS EXPRESS
IMO 9227015
4,253 TEU 2002
9.9
D
1386 MSC ENGLAND
IMO 9232890
4,132 TEU 2001
9.9
D
1387 MSC EAGLE III
IMO 9302449
2,478 TEU 2004
9.9
D
1388 BALTIMORE STAR
IMO 9440796
4,255 TEU 2009
9.9
D
1389 CAPE SPENCER
IMO 9950129
2,713 TEU 2023
9.9
D
1390 RITA
IMO 9301988
2,785 TEU 2007
9.9
D
1391 PEPI STAR
IMO 9971020
1,800 TEU 2024
9.9
D
1392 MOL EXPERIENCE
IMO 9333838
4,803 TEU 2007
9.9
D
1393 MSC ARUSHI R.
IMO 9244881
4,112 TEU 2002
9.9
D
1394 AS PETRONIA
IMO 9286786
2,550 TEU 2003
9.9
D
1395 NORDAMELIA
IMO 9724958
2,506 TEU 2017
9.9
D
1396 XIN CHANG SHA
IMO 9312559
4,250 TEU 2005
9.9
D
1397 CINZIA A
IMO 9226516
2,452 TEU 2001
9.9
D
1398 SPIRIT OF SYDNEY
IMO 9391672
3,630 TEU 2005
9.9
D
1399 JADRANA
IMO 9619385
4,957 TEU 2014
10.0
D
1400 MAERSK BALI
IMO 9394870
3,100 TEU 2008
10.0
D
Page 28 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.