Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#119 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-58% greener
A
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 MSC JADE
IMO 9762326
17,664 TEU 2016
4.3
A
102 ONE MEISHAN
IMO 9805465
14,000 TEU 2018
4.3
A
104 ONE FRUITION
IMO 9934371
15,000 TEU 2023
4.3
A
103 OOCL GERMANY
IMO 9776183
21,100 TEU 2017
4.3
A
105 ONE FORTUNE
IMO 9944819
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
106 MONACO MAERSK
IMO 9778832
20,568 TEU 2017
4.3
A
109 MSC VIVIANA
IMO 9777216
17,273 TEU 2017
4.3
A
108 MARCHEN MAERSK
IMO 9632143
18,340 TEU 2011
4.3
A
107 MOSCOW MAERSK
IMO 9778818
20,568 TEU 2015
4.3
A
110 MAERSK CAMPTON
IMO 9924211
15,500 TEU 2022
4.4
A
111 OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
IMO 9776200
21,100 TEU 2015
4.4
A
112 MURCIA MAERSK
IMO 9780457
20,568 TEU 2015
4.4
A
114 CMA CGM MONTMARTRE
IMO 9839155
23,500 TEU 2021
4.4
A
113 MSC IVANA
IMO 9398371
11,700 TEU 2008
4.4
A
116 MSC FREYA
IMO 9932062
15,264 TEU 2023
4.4
A
115 CMA CGM PALAIS ROYAL
IMO 9839181
22,448 TEU 2020
4.4
A
118 CMA CGM TENERE
IMO 9859117
15,128 TEU 2020
4.4
A
117 ZHONG GU XIONG AN
IMO 9812901
2,500 TEU 2018
4.4
A
119 CMA CGM LOUVRE
IMO 9839143
23,500 TEU 2020
4.4
A
121 MSC JEWEL
IMO 9842073
15,000 TEU 2019
4.4
A
120 MSC OLIVER
IMO 9703306
18,400 TEU 2015
4.4
A
122 MSC ELENOIRE
IMO 9962603
202,562 2024
4.4
A
125 ALS CERES
IMO 9938303
7,165 TEU 2021
4.4
A
124 MAERSK HAVANA
IMO 9784336
15,282 TEU 2019
4.4
A
123 MSC ANNA
IMO 9777204
17,273 TEU 2016
4.4
A
127 MSC CLARA
IMO 9708693
18,400 TEU 2015
4.4
A
126 HMM HANBADA
IMO 9869203
14,000 TEU 2021
4.4
A
128 ONE TRIBUTE
IMO 9769295
20,170 TEU 2017
4.4
A
130 HYUNDAI PLUTO
IMO 9725160
10,000 TEU 2016
4.4
A
129 OOCL JAPAN
IMO 9776195
21,100 TEU 2017
4.4
A
131 OOCL SCANDINAVIA
IMO 9776212
21,100 TEU 2017
4.5
A
132 MAERSK HONG KONG
IMO 9784257
15,282 TEU 2017
4.5
A
134 MSC AUDREY
IMO 9540065
15,128 TEU 2023
4.5
A
133 MSC MAURA
IMO 9962536
202,562 2024
4.5
A
135 MSC VICTORINE
IMO 9946867
16,000 TEU 2023
4.5
A
137 MSC MARIE
IMO 9962574
202,562 2024
4.5
A
136 ONE MILANO
IMO 9757187
13,870 TEU 2018
4.5
A
139 YM WREATH
IMO 9708473
14,198 TEU 2017
4.5
A
138 MSC AMBRA
IMO 9839480
22,000 TEU 2020
4.5
A
140 MAERSK HANOI
IMO 9784295
15,282 TEU 2018
4.5
A
142 METTE MAERSK
IMO 9632155
18,340 TEU 2015
4.5
A
141 ONE FRONTIER
IMO 9934383
15,000 TEU 2023
4.5
A
143 COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
IMO 9795610
21,000 TEU 2018
4.5
A
146 CMA CGM IGUACU
IMO 9859131
15,128 TEU 2021
4.5
A
145 OOCL HONG KONG
IMO 9776171
21,413 TEU 2017
4.5
A
144 MSC GULSUN
IMO 9839430
22,000 TEU 2019
4.5
A
148 MSC TINA
IMO 9762340
15,909 TEU 2017
4.5
A
147 MSC ALLEGRA
IMO 9897028
23,656 TEU 2021
4.5
A
150 HMM MIR
IMO 9869198
14,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
149 OOCL ABU DHABI
IMO 9922524
24,188 TEU 2024
4.5
A
Page 3 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.