Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#120 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
-58% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
100 MSC LORENZA
IMO 9962598
202,562 2024
4.3
A
102 MAERSK HIDALGO
IMO 9784283
15,282 TEU 2015
4.3
A
103 ONE MEISHAN
IMO 9805465
14,000 TEU 2018
4.3
A
104 OOCL GERMANY
IMO 9776183
21,100 TEU 2017
4.3
A
105 ONE FRUITION
IMO 9934371
15,000 TEU 2023
4.3
A
106 ONE FORTUNE
IMO 9944819
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
107 MONACO MAERSK
IMO 9778832
20,568 TEU 2017
4.3
A
108 MSC VIVIANA
IMO 9777216
17,273 TEU 2017
4.3
A
110 MOSCOW MAERSK
IMO 9778818
20,568 TEU 2015
4.3
A
109 MARCHEN MAERSK
IMO 9632143
18,340 TEU 2011
4.3
A
111 MAERSK CAMPTON
IMO 9924211
15,500 TEU 2022
4.4
A
112 MURCIA MAERSK
IMO 9780457
20,568 TEU 2015
4.4
A
113 OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
IMO 9776200
21,100 TEU 2015
4.4
A
115 CMA CGM MONTMARTRE
IMO 9839155
23,500 TEU 2021
4.4
A
114 MSC IVANA
IMO 9398371
11,700 TEU 2008
4.4
A
117 MSC FREYA
IMO 9932062
15,264 TEU 2023
4.4
A
116 CMA CGM TENERE
IMO 9859117
15,128 TEU 2020
4.4
A
118 ZHONG GU XIONG AN
IMO 9812901
2,500 TEU 2018
4.4
A
119 CMA CGM PALAIS ROYAL
IMO 9839181
22,448 TEU 2020
4.4
A
121 MSC ELENOIRE
IMO 9962603
202,562 2024
4.4
A
123 MSC JEWEL
IMO 9842073
15,000 TEU 2019
4.4
A
120 CMA CGM LOUVRE
IMO 9839143
23,500 TEU 2020
4.4
A
122 MSC OLIVER
IMO 9703306
18,400 TEU 2015
4.4
A
126 MSC ANNA
IMO 9777204
17,273 TEU 2016
4.4
A
125 MAERSK HAVANA
IMO 9784336
15,282 TEU 2019
4.4
A
124 ALS CERES
IMO 9938303
7,165 TEU 2021
4.4
A
127 MSC CLARA
IMO 9708693
18,400 TEU 2015
4.4
A
129 HMM HANBADA
IMO 9869203
14,000 TEU 2021
4.4
A
128 ONE TRIBUTE
IMO 9769295
20,170 TEU 2017
4.4
A
130 OOCL JAPAN
IMO 9776195
21,100 TEU 2017
4.4
A
132 HYUNDAI PLUTO
IMO 9725160
10,000 TEU 2016
4.4
A
131 MSC ZOE
IMO 9703318
19,224 TEU 2015
4.4
A
134 OOCL SCANDINAVIA
IMO 9776212
21,100 TEU 2017
4.5
A
133 MAERSK HONG KONG
IMO 9784257
15,282 TEU 2017
4.5
A
138 MSC AUDREY
IMO 9540065
15,128 TEU 2023
4.5
A
137 MSC MAURA
IMO 9962536
202,562 2024
4.5
A
139 MSC MARIE
IMO 9962574
202,562 2024
4.5
A
136 ONE MILANO
IMO 9757187
13,870 TEU 2018
4.5
A
135 MSC VICTORINE
IMO 9946867
16,000 TEU 2023
4.5
A
140 MSC AMBRA
IMO 9839480
22,000 TEU 2020
4.5
A
141 YM WREATH
IMO 9708473
14,198 TEU 2017
4.5
A
143 COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
IMO 9795610
21,000 TEU 2018
4.5
A
144 ONE FRONTIER
IMO 9934383
15,000 TEU 2023
4.5
A
142 MAERSK HANOI
IMO 9784295
15,282 TEU 2018
4.5
A
145 METTE MAERSK
IMO 9632155
18,340 TEU 2015
4.5
A
148 CMA CGM IGUACU
IMO 9859131
15,128 TEU 2021
4.5
A
147 OOCL HONG KONG
IMO 9776171
21,413 TEU 2017
4.5
A
146 MSC GULSUN
IMO 9839430
22,000 TEU 2019
4.5
A
150 MSC TINA
IMO 9762340
15,909 TEU 2017
4.5
A
149 MSC ALLEGRA
IMO 9897028
23,656 TEU 2021
4.5
A
Page 3 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.