Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#646 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-15% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 216 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
31
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
29
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,237 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
600 GC BERYL
IMO 9924912
19,994 2021
8.1
C
602 BOCHEM BUCEPHALAS
IMO 9760550
25,087 2014
8.2
C
603 BOW EXPLORER
IMO 9828211
38,235 2020
8.2
C
604 ARDMORE CHINOOK
IMO 9707869
25,233 2013
8.2
C
605 MTM SANTOS
IMO 9712606
22,396 2015
8.2
C
607 MARINER A
IMO 9288954
40,099 2003
8.2
C
606 CONTI GREENLAND
IMO 9391397
37,599 2008
8.2
C
608 GINGA THRESHER
IMO 9829746
25,174 2019
8.2
C
610 STOLT MAPLE
IMO 9764491
32,825 2017
8.2
C
609 STOLT PONDO
IMO 9374521
33,232 2007
8.2
C
611 STOLT SNELAND
IMO 9352212
44,080 2008
8.2
C
612 MTM PENANG
IMO 9712591
22,413 2015
8.2
C
613 STOLT APAL
IMO 9719240
32,798 2016
8.2
C
614 GOLD TRADER I
IMO 9907017
33,343 2019
8.2
C
615 BOW LYNX
IMO 9989194
25,914 2024
8.2
C
616 EDGE GALAXY
IMO 9788954
19,946 2017
8.3
C
617 TIVY GOLD
IMO 9251559
39,999 2003
8.3
C
618 KAMUI GALAXY
IMO 9942653
26,400 2022
8.3
C
619 JANE
IMO 9364588
51,506 2008
8.3
C
620 BOW LION
IMO 9952177
26,021 2023
8.3
C
621 MALBEC LEGEND
IMO 9732814
37,596 2016
8.3
C
622 HACI KEMAL KA
IMO 9315757
37,627 2003
8.3
C
623 SC SCORPIO
IMO 9801079
40,964 2017
8.3
C
625 RAMANDA
IMO 9739812
17,994 2018
8.3
C
624 POLKA
IMO 9422641
37,759 2006
8.3
C
627 STOLT FOCUS
IMO 9214305
37,467 2001
8.3
C
626 KRITI JADE
IMO 9391311
50,564 2006
8.3
C
628 FAIRCHEM VALOR
IMO 9791195
22,292 2019
8.3
C
629 CHEMROUTE PEGASUS
IMO 9566162
26,153 2012
8.3
C
632 DIDIMON
IMO 9288772
37,432 2005
8.4
C
631 SLOGEN
IMO 9733375
19,996 2016
8.4
C
630 BOCHEM MUMBAI
IMO 9565637
33,636 2006
8.4
C
633 FAIRCHEM ANGEL
IMO 9809394
25,245 2020
8.4
C
636 BOW CARDINAL
IMO 9114244
37,446 1997
8.4
C
635 VIVA
IMO 9156539
16,116 1999
8.4
C
634 FENICUSA M
IMO 9381500
40,037 2008
8.4
C
637 KRITI ADMIRAL
IMO 9314870
37,266 2007
8.4
C
638 NAVIG8 UNIVERSE
IMO 9489106
45,313 2013
8.4
C
639 MTM KOBE
IMO 9776456
21,183 2018
8.4
C
642 FAIRCHEM PATHFINDER
IMO 9975301
26,300 2022
8.4
C
641 SOLAR AILENE
IMO 9877664
25,039 2018
8.4
C
640 EALDOR
IMO 9282924
20,810 2003
8.4
C
643 ANKARA
IMO 9253777
40,081 2004
8.4
C
644 SOLAR SHARNA
IMO 9877614
25,039 2018
8.4
C
645 STOLT TUCAN
IMO 9811127
15,081 2019
8.5
C
646 BAGHEERA
IMO 9670949
39,999 2014
8.5
C
650 SEA NIMBUS
IMO 9724544
39,999 2016
8.5
C
649 NAVIG8 CONSTELLATION
IMO 9489118
45,281 2013
8.5
C
648 CB BALTIC
IMO 9851701
37,874 2020
8.5
C
647 TSUKUBA GALAXY
IMO 9796834
26,175 2020
8.5
C
Page 13 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.