Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#271 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-38% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
252 PHILIPP OLDENDORFF
IMO 9540869
115,156 2011
2.9
A
251 POUNDA
IMO 9493028
177,605 2006
2.9
A
250 NICOLAUS SCHULTE
IMO 9966312
82,004 2023
2.9
A
255 ENERGY COSMOS
IMO 9878151
82,000 2020
2.9
A
257 PUNTA DEL CHILENO
IMO 1030868
82,050 2025
2.9
A
256 MARATHOS
IMO 9512056
119,277 2012
2.9
A
254 ALPHA LIBERTY
IMO 9590709
179,276 2011
2.9
A
260 REGINA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9535242
121,677 2011
2.9
A
259 GUANG BO
IMO 9965033
82,245 2023
2.9
A
258 CASTILLO DE MALPICA
IMO 9722962
119,613 2015
2.9
A
261 ARMONIA A
IMO 9752151
82,085 2018
2.9
A
262 AGIA FILOTHEI A
IMO 9781011
81,795 2019
2.9
A
264 AMERICA
IMO 1023968
82,142 2021
2.9
A
263 SCION MATHILDA
IMO 1023956
82,249 2021
2.9
A
270 NEW ELIAS
IMO 9313400
174,222 2003
2.9
A
268 OCEAN ROAD
IMO 9503201
179,181 2009
2.9
A
269 AMO
IMO 9296626
82,214 2006
2.9
A
267 NAVIOS SOL
IMO 9545170
180,274 2009
2.9
A
266 ULTRA LYNX
IMO 9811048
81,607 2018
2.9
A
265 ANABELA
IMO 9587350
177,029 2010
2.9
A
273 BTG DENALI
IMO 9687851
81,084 2015
2.9
A
272 BASIC SKY
IMO 9982196
81,917 2023
2.9
A
271 PYXIS OCEAN
IMO 9798856
79,898 2017
2.9
A
274 AESCHYLUS GRAECIA
IMO 9841964
82,041 2019
2.9
A
276 TRANSCENDEN EMERALD
IMO 9948839
84,958 2023
2.9
A
275 JAG AMOL
IMO 9676113
81,843 2015
2.9
A
277 LOWLANDS AMBITION
IMO 9947287
82,400 2024
2.9
A
279 NAVIOS MELODIA
IMO 9451276
179,132 2006
2.9
A
278 AQUAVITA AIR
IMO 9846110
82,192 2020
2.9
A
280 STAR TOPAZ
IMO 9843364
82,044 2019
2.9
A
284 IMPERIUS
IMO 9403504
179,062 2011
3.0
A
283 GCL KRISHNA
IMO 9939931
120,326 2021
3.0
A
282 NORA SCHULTE
IMO 9966300
81,957 2023
3.0
A
281 SEACON ANTWERP
IMO 9984730
82,806 2024
3.0
A
285 NORDIC NULUUJAAK
IMO 9884966
95,758 2021
3.0
A
286 AQUAVITA AIM
IMO 9846108
82,192 2019
3.0
A
287 GIANT ACE
IMO 9501851
179,184 2009
3.0
A
289 KEY KNIGHT
IMO 9512317
82,099 2012
3.0
A
288 SARAH H
IMO 9858539
80,717 2020
3.0
A
290 DONNA ALEXANDRA
IMO 9950595
82,183 2023
3.0
A
293 VENATOR
IMO 9836983
81,700 2019
3.0
A
292 XING AN HAI
IMO 1025784
82,216 2024
3.0
A
291 MONEMVASIA
IMO 9455686
174,999 2009
3.0
A
299 EASTERN HEATHER
IMO 9948023
82,270 2021
3.0
A
298 NAVIOS KOYO
IMO 9598127
181,415 2011
3.0
A
297 TROODOS OAK
IMO 9875135
85,439 2020
3.0
A
296 BERGE TORRE
IMO 9453731
175,935 2011
3.0
A
295 NAVIOS BONAVIS
IMO 9446996
179,850 2009
3.0
A
294 EMMY
IMO 9956202
82,151 2023
3.0
A
300 MINIMATA
IMO 9952464
82,202 2023
3.0
A
Page 6 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.