Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#3,038 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+42% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3001 LIPSI
IMO 9522958
35,066 2011
6.5
E
3002 MAPLE AMBITION
IMO 9760354
35,513 2015
6.6
E
3003 PVT EMERALD
IMO 9486427
33,802 2011
6.6
E
3004 SEAHOPE
IMO 9598294
32,922 2012
6.6
E
3005 AZURE
IMO 9432256
56,781 2012
6.6
E
3006 STRATEGIC SAVANNAH
IMO 9686338
35,542 2013
6.6
E
3007 AUTUMN SEA
IMO 9639775
35,200 2013
6.6
E
3008 AURORA TRADER
IMO 9595967
37,019 2012
6.6
E
3009 BLUEBILL
IMO 9263306
37,332 2004
6.6
E
3010 ORCINUS
IMO 9467952
34,094 2010
6.6
E
3011 BARNACLE
IMO 9409742
30,803 2009
6.6
E
3012 ALANDA STAR
IMO 9189677
31,828 1999
6.6
E
3013 CETUS OMURA
IMO 9670781
43,532 2016
6.6
E
3014 MEL GRACE
IMO 9590955
38,225 2011
6.6
E
3015 HELENA G
IMO 9358383
37,251 2007
6.6
E
3016 ABK LEGEND
IMO 9238674
30,039 2000
6.6
E
3017 STRATEGIC FORTITUDE
IMO 9753387
37,829 2016
6.6
E
3018 PUCK
IMO 9594250
37,930 2012
6.6
E
3019 STRATEGIC EXPLORER
IMO 9723708
39,880 2015
6.6
E
3020 JAGUAR
IMO 9464948
36,839 2011
6.6
E
3021 LONDON BAY
IMO 9286944
29,727 2004
6.6
E
3022 AGIA DYNAMI
IMO 9502764
34,292 2010
6.6
E
3023 OSLEEN
IMO 9278739
33,658 2004
6.6
E
3024 REDHEAD
IMO 9413901
29,724 2010
6.6
E
3025 GOLDEN CITRUS
IMO 9663740
39,232 2015
6.6
E
3026 LADY VENEZIA
IMO 9641821
28,207 2013
6.6
E
3027 BABITONGA BAY
IMO 9663776
39,202 2015
6.7
E
3028 AMALIA
IMO 9588354
35,063 2010
6.7
E
3029 MAAS CONFIDENCE
IMO 9713210
34,914 2016
6.7
E
3030 BRAVE M
IMO 9153496
28,412 1998
6.7
E
3031 YARA J
IMO 9118147
34,169 1997
6.7
E
3032 PHOENICIAN-M
IMO 9450806
37,973 2010
6.7
E
3033 G PUTUO
IMO 9491238
56,780 2011
6.7
E
3034 ACTION TRADER
IMO 9808663
39,481 2017
6.7
E
3035 MARYAM D
IMO 9740445
36,176 2016
6.7
E
3036 K SUKRET
IMO 9571442
33,814 2014
6.7
E
3037 YASA KYOTO
IMO 9948267
37,396 2023
6.7
E
3038 PODLASIE
IMO 9346811
38,981 2008
6.7
E
3039 VIVA COSMOS
IMO 9251327
52,089 2003
6.7
E
3040 HANDY STRANGER
IMO 9643453
34,753 2014
6.7
E
3041 SHIMANAMI STAR
IMO 9377717
28,447 2006
6.7
E
3042 BELASITZA
IMO 9498262
30,696 2011
6.7
E
3043 TAN BINH 345
IMO 9491680
37,218 2011
6.7
E
3044 ARDENNES
IMO 9646699
36,062 2011
6.7
E
3045 DS MANATEE
IMO 9255189
27,129 2002
6.7
E
3046 CATIVERA
IMO 9172105
24,154 1998
6.7
E
3047 SERENITY
IMO 9606120
52,000 2016
6.7
E
3048 GOLDEN ARSENAL
IMO 9493212
28,221 2011
6.7
E
3049 LILA TOCHIGI
IMO 9683116
28,354 2014
6.7
E
3050 ALLEGRA
IMO 9519169
35,118 2008
6.7
E
Page 61 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.