Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#165 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-52% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
151 BUKHA
IMO 9500936
319,439 2008
2.5
A
150 MARAN THETIS
IMO 9421427
320,105 2012
2.5
A
155 ANDROMEDA
IMO 9352561
321,300 2008
2.5
A
154 HOMERIC
IMO 9819844
159,090 2019
2.5
A
153 SEAPASSION
IMO 9783734
299,271 2017
2.5
A
156 GRAND AMBITION
IMO 9909807
299,988 2021
2.5
A
157 COSFLOURISH LAKE
IMO 9783356
308,152 2017
2.5
A
158 ENERGY DELOS
IMO 9994565
158,091 2025
2.5
A
159 ALMI ODYSSEY
IMO 9579559
157,787 2013
2.5
A
160 YUAN BEI HAI
IMO 9843352
158,840 2021
2.5
A
164 FRONT SAVANNAH
IMO 9831828
157,270 2017
2.5
A
163 FRONT CASCADE
IMO 9769829
157,434 2017
2.5
A
162 LOIRE
IMO 9761516
157,463 2016
2.5
A
161 RHYTHMIC
IMO 9819856
159,196 2015
2.5
A
165 MARAN LYNX
IMO 9534016
318,833 2011
2.5
A
166 ATLANTIC
IMO 9912139
158,337 2015
2.5
A
168 EAST LOYALTY
IMO 9537745
323,183 2011
2.5
A
167 SEA BEAUTY
IMO 9806627
156,634 2016
2.5
A
171 AEGEAN MARATHON
IMO 9745225
158,914 2014
2.5
A
170 CANOPUS VOYAGER
IMO 9897846
115,589 2019
2.5
A
169 FRONT SANTIAGO
IMO 9831842
157,270 2017
2.5
A
172 SONANGOL KULUMBIMBI
IMO 9938482
157,663 2023
2.5
A
173 OLYMPIC FIGHTER
IMO 9745263
158,932 2014
2.5
A
176 STENA SUNSHINE
IMO 9585900
159,039 2013
2.5
A
174 MARAN ORPHEUS
IMO 9868168
157,946 2020
2.5
A
175 SYDNEY SPIRIT
IMO 9594781
158,542 2012
2.5
A
177 PRIMEWAY
IMO 9817626
157,470 2016
2.5
A
180 MARLIN SICILY
IMO 9835848
156,563 2017
2.5
A
179 COSWISDOM LAKE
IMO 9727194
308,019 2016
2.5
A
178 ARGEUS I
IMO 1025485
155,352 2025
2.5
A
181 NEPTUNE MOON
IMO 9784013
157,162 2019
2.5
A
182 YASA SCORPION
IMO 9643271
313,998 2013
2.6
A
183 ELANDRA EAGLE
IMO 9792474
157,554 2017
2.6
A
184 MIAOULIS 21
IMO 9886641
158,081 2021
2.6
A
185 ATLANTIC PRINCESS
IMO 9899363
156,828 2021
2.6
A
186 FRONT CRUISER
IMO 9797230
157,215 2020
2.6
A
187 MINERVA EVROPI
IMO 9785237
159,000 2015
2.6
A
193 BLUE NOVA
IMO 9534846
297,085 2011
2.6
A
192 DELTA HELLAS
IMO 9406673
157,583 2009
2.6
A
191 SONANGOL RANGEL
IMO 9575541
157,756 2010
2.6
A
190 WEST LOYALTY
IMO 9537757
314,000 2011
2.6
A
189 IPANEMA
IMO 9996410
158,412 2022
2.6
A
188 FRONT SILKEBORG
IMO 9832274
158,006 2017
2.6
A
195 YUAN DONG HAI
IMO 9843338
158,677 2020
2.6
A
194 FRONT SEOUL
IMO 9831854
157,270 2017
2.6
A
200 ENERGY DIONE
IMO 9995973
158,092 2025
2.6
A
199 HERCULES I
IMO 9723124
300,000 2013
2.6
A
198 FRONT COSMOS
IMO 9769817
157,528 2017
2.6
A
197 CYAN NOVA
IMO 9534004
318,663 2011
2.6
A
196 NORDIC CYGNUS
IMO 9818228
157,526 2018
2.6
A
Page 4 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.