Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#207 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-51% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
202 TAIPAN
IMO 9996393
159,076 2024
2.5
A
201 FRONT CROWN
IMO 9759757
157,460 2016
2.5
A
206 SEA ICON
IMO 9806615
156,559 2017
2.5
A
205 SONANGOL NAMIBE
IMO 9325049
158,425 2004
2.5
A
204 DELTA TOLMI
IMO 9429027
157,488 2010
2.5
A
203 SEA GALAXY
IMO 9935648
156,733 2022
2.5
A
207 MARAN HERCULES
IMO 9761360
157,755 2017
2.5
A
210 MARAN PLATO
IMO 9399507
158,267 2009
2.5
A
212 FRONT COSMOS
IMO 9769817
157,528 2017
2.5
A
209 SFL FRASER
IMO 9874258
158,060 2020
2.5
A
208 NORDIC STAR
IMO 9748679
157,737 2016
2.5
A
211 MARAN PHOEBE
IMO 9868156
157,946 2020
2.5
A
213 ZENITH SPIRIT
IMO 9404845
159,952 2009
2.5
A
215 PLATA LUCKY
IMO 9358292
307,284 2009
2.5
A
214 AQUABLISS
IMO 9922835
157,746 2022
2.5
A
220 SEA AMBER
IMO 9772931
158,455 2016
2.5
A
219 LONDON SPIRIT
IMO 9594779
158,510 2011
2.5
A
218 SAN JACINTO
IMO 9730373
158,734 2016
2.5
A
217 AEGEAN DREAM
IMO 9645425
158,888 2015
2.5
A
216 SYDNEY SPIRIT
IMO 9594781
158,542 2012
2.5
A
221 SFL ALBANY
IMO 9874246
158,060 2020
2.5
A
224 SEAWAYS MONTAUK
IMO 9779537
158,432 2017
2.5
A
223 MARAN LEO
IMO 9602473
319,450 2014
2.5
A
225 SEA CORAL
IMO 9935650
156,674 2022
2.5
A
222 ELANDRA EAGLE
IMO 9792474
157,554 2017
2.5
A
226 SEA ONYX
IMO 9922108
156,646 2022
2.5
A
227 SUMMIT SPIRIT
IMO 9404833
159,955 2008
2.5
A
228 POPI SAZAKLIS
IMO 9817494
157,610 2018
2.5
A
229 CYAN NOVA
IMO 9534004
318,663 2011
2.5
A
231 SONANGOL KULUMBIMBI
IMO 9938482
157,663 2023
2.5
A
230 ATLANTA SPIRIT
IMO 9578646
158,650 2011
2.5
A
235 HARMONIC
IMO 9819868
159,204 2019
2.6
A
234 NORDIC HARRIER
IMO 9921063
157,094 2022
2.6
A
233 SONANGOL CAZENGA
IMO 9766310
156,899 2017
2.6
A
232 AEGEAN UNITY
IMO 9745237
158,932 2016
2.6
A
236 FRONT CASCADE
IMO 9769829
157,434 2017
2.6
A
239 FRONT CHALLENGER
IMO 9759745
157,407 2016
2.6
A
238 AL RUWAIS
IMO 9828405
114,695 2021
2.6
A
240 T.SEMAHAT
IMO 9804148
157,453 2017
2.6
A
237 FRONT SHANGHAI
IMO 9832262
158,006 2019
2.6
A
242 DIMITRI
IMO 9924015
157,010 2023
2.6
A
241 AQUAFREEDOM
IMO 9922823
157,746 2022
2.6
A
243 ARAGONA
IMO 9513115
319,319 2012
2.6
A
244 DINO
IMO 9923994
157,010 2022
2.6
A
247 ELISABETH MAERSK
IMO 9682980
158,277 2017
2.6
A
246 COBALT NOVA
IMO 9534028
299,989 2011
2.6
A
245 NEW ASPIRE
IMO 9486544
296,633 2011
2.6
A
250 FRONT SAMARA
IMO 9845130
158,018 2019
2.6
A
249 OLYMPIC FIGHTER
IMO 9745263
158,932 2017
2.6
A
248 GULF SUNRISE
IMO 9788887
301,528 2017
2.6
A
Page 5 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.