Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,461 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+14% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2451 FEDERAL KIVALINA
IMO 9205885
36,578 2000
5.4
D
2452 HAATO
IMO 9589786
61,472 2011
5.4
D
2453 CAPTAIN D LEMPESIS
IMO 9364801
53,466 2005
5.4
D
2454 SHUN FU XING
IMO 9213363
75,172 2001
5.4
D
2455 ALKYONIS
IMO 9709465
37,418 2016
5.4
D
2456 SHEILA
IMO 9730244
58,608 2013
5.4
D
2457 ARUNA CIHAN
IMO 9543756
57,411 2011
5.4
D
2458 NJ JUPITER
IMO 9302841
56,025 2005
5.4
D
2459 ERNEST VINBERG
IMO 9707649
63,411 2015
5.4
D
2460 LMZ TITAN
IMO 9466908
56,831 2012
5.4
D
2461 TUNSIN
IMO 9768954
37,657 2017
5.4
D
2462 ENJOY PROSPERITY
IMO 9545728
56,726 2011
5.4
D
2463 FEDERAL DELTA
IMO 9805271
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2464 OMURTAG
IMO 9605839
56,709 2012
5.4
D
2465 AG VALOR
IMO 9312327
28,510 2004
5.4
D
2466 ASTRO SANISTRA
IMO 9805661
60,365 2018
5.4
D
2467 FUJI HARMONY
IMO 9913999
39,989 2022
5.4
D
2468 NEW SIHAM
IMO 9197882
31,025 1999
5.4
D
2469 CL HEIDI
IMO 9720952
63,572 2016
5.4
D
2470 DODO
IMO 9662320
39,017 2012
5.4
D
2471 LALE S
IMO 9603051
57,970 2011
5.4
D
2472 LADY SPERANZA
IMO 9200574
16,870 2000
5.4
D
2473 ROSALIA
IMO 9696826
39,907 2016
5.4
D
2474 VIVA GLOBUS
IMO 9251315
52,300 2002
5.4
D
2475 ROOSTER
IMO 9723942
37,896 2013
5.4
D
2476 FEDERAL NAGARA
IMO 9805257
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2477 DENSA SEAL
IMO 9649110
37,586 2011
5.4
D
2478 DSM FERRO
IMO 9236092
50,320 2001
5.4
D
2479 FEDERAL SHIMANTO
IMO 9218404
32,787 2001
5.4
D
2480 MURGASH
IMO 9996965
32,193 2025
5.4
D
2481 LI DA CHANG
IMO 9547817
56,316 2010
5.4
D
2482 FEDERAL MONTREAL
IMO 9838474
34,492 2019
5.4
D
2483 LUGANO
IMO 9132662
28,350 1996
5.4
D
2484 SEA MOON
IMO 9228227
28,494 2002
5.4
D
2485 BAO RUI LING
IMO 9617258
47,522 2014
5.4
D
2486 FEDERAL SATSUKI
IMO 9515101
35,885 2012
5.4
D
2487 NORDLOIRE
IMO 9596026
37,212 2013
5.4
D
2488 JNS LAKE
IMO 1039357
40,489 2024
5.4
D
2489 JIN CHAO
IMO 9691412
63,518 2014
5.4
D
2490 FEDERAL FRONTIER
IMO 9866768
34,492 2021
5.4
D
2491 QING HUA SHAN
IMO 9741528
63,457 2016
5.4
D
2492 OUTRIDER
IMO 9701061
33,190 2016
5.4
D
2493 SEASTAR AVALON
IMO 9755921
36,184 2017
5.4
D
2494 YANNIS
IMO 9401910
50,779 2009
5.4
D
2495 TAURUS
IMO 9273818
76,616 2004
5.4
D
2496 CS JADEN
IMO 9660061
38,101 2013
5.4
D
2497 BERGE RISHIRI
IMO 9713222
35,172 2017
5.4
D
2498 RUBINA
IMO 9725512
39,959 2018
5.4
D
2499 CAIPIRINHA
IMO 9714769
38,668 2015
5.4
D
2500 CETUS BOWHEAD
IMO 9670755
43,433 2015
5.4
D
Page 50 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.