Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#335 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-36% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 632 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,728 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,124
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,918–11,738M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,124 of 1,124 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
302 EPIC RADIANCE
IMO 9970234
82,555 2024
3.0
A
301 BABY HERCULES
IMO 9478822
110,861 2011
3.0
A
303 PORT FUKUOKA
IMO 9932799
64,611 2021
3.0
A
308 JAG AMAR
IMO 9723851
82,083 2017
3.0
A
306 THUNDER ISLAND
IMO 9897901
82,558 2021
3.0
A
309 PENGLAI
IMO 9952438
82,236 2023
3.0
A
305 JEN LR
IMO 9947249
82,411 2023
3.0
A
307 GEMMA
IMO 9602784
313,049 2012
3.0
A
304 ROYAL NEPTUNE
IMO 9851517
80,873 2020
3.0
A
310 MARINI
IMO 9639529
205,855 2014
3.0
A
311 ARTEMIS I
IMO 9830991
80,976 2019
3.0
A
315 EASTERN GLAMOUR
IMO 9459345
115,461 2011
3.1
A
314 CHAILEASE BLOSSOM
IMO 9622540
82,146 2013
3.1
A
313 RIO DULCE
IMO 9501617
178,076 2011
3.1
A
312 AQUAVITA WEALTH
IMO 9985784
64,700 2024
3.1
A
316 PYXIS OCEAN
IMO 9798856
79,898 2017
3.1
A
317 PEDHOULAS COMMANDER
IMO 9381524
83,685 2008
3.1
A
319 HSL VEGAS
IMO 9928372
81,981 2022
3.1
A
318 SSI INTERCEPTOR
IMO 9919008
63,896 2023
3.1
A
320 LEO IRIS
IMO 9709001
81,820 2015
3.1
A
321 BTG MISTI
IMO 9952488
82,235 2023
3.1
A
324 NBA RUBENS
IMO 9477220
107,290 2011
3.1
A
323 MG MERCURY
IMO 9774290
84,790 2016
3.1
A
322 EPIC HARMONY
IMO 9922005
82,546 2021
3.1
A
327 CL ZHANGJIAJIE
IMO 9953365
64,766 2024
3.1
A
326 BW MATSUYAMA
IMO 9836488
81,810 2019
3.1
A
325 CLIVIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9599195
98,704 2013
3.1
A
329 MAIRAKI
IMO 9444546
181,016 2011
3.1
A
328 PENELOPE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9464596
114,861 2010
3.1
A
330 SEACON HAMBURG
IMO 9936276
85,505 2023
3.1
A
332 SEACON TOKYO
IMO 9941958
66,628 2023
3.1
A
331 JOSCO DAZHOU
IMO 9934187
64,247 2022
3.1
A
334 NAVIOS FULVIA
IMO 9500986
179,263 2006
3.1
A
333 SASEBO GREEN
IMO 9675468
77,880 2014
3.1
A
337 AQUAVITA AIR
IMO 9846110
82,192 2020
3.1
A
338 SEAGEM
IMO 9758375
81,714 2019
3.1
A
336 SEAHUNTER
IMO 9974424
63,253 2024
3.1
A
344 PUPLINGE
IMO 9782156
81,672 2016
3.1
A
339 BBG MUARA
IMO 9929003
81,991 2022
3.1
A
335 KYPROS BRAVERY
IMO 9694490
77,997 2015
3.1
A
343 OCEANIA GRAECA
IMO 9841952
82,033 2019
3.1
A
342 TRUSTN TRADER
IMO 9937555
82,245 2023
3.1
A
341 CMB RUBENS
IMO 9832640
63,514 2018
3.1
A
340 MEDI EGADI
IMO 9802217
81,874 2018
3.1
A
345 LUCKY JESSICA
IMO 9332793
77,247 2006
3.1
A
350 CSSC AMSTERDAM
IMO 9853890
120,566 2020
3.1
A
349 SAKIZAYA RESPECT
IMO 9783150
81,858 2018
3.1
A
348 MYRTO C
IMO 9752383
81,011 2017
3.1
A
347 CIARA MARU
IMO 9932098
82,626 2022
3.1
A
346 PRAIRIE
IMO 9860506
81,614 2019
3.1
A
Page 7 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.