Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,122 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-19% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1103 EQUINOX SOFRANO
IMO 9860221
61,056 2015
3.8
B
1105 PAMPERO
IMO 9426104
93,275 2011
3.8
B
1102 EASTERN JUNIPER
IMO 9922251
61,185 2022
3.8
B
1107 STAR WESTPORT
IMO 9705988
63,334 2015
3.8
B
1106 KOBAYASHI MARU
IMO 9847011
60,397 2019
3.8
B
1101 EPSON TRADER
IMO 9872963
62,661 2021
3.8
B
1104 XIN HAI TONG 23
IMO 9453236
56,708 2010
3.8
B
1108 GIORGIS
IMO 9619775
82,566 2014
3.8
B
1111 FEDERAL INTEGRITY
IMO 9933066
63,729 2023
3.8
B
1120 KAVO YERAKI
IMO 9286607
82,926 2006
3.8
B
1110 LACERTA
IMO 9512367
82,265 2012
3.8
B
1121 AQUA LADY
IMO 9288435
76,492 2004
3.8
B
1109 LOWLANDS FUTURE
IMO 9799771
60,063 2017
3.8
B
1112 ANTIPAROS
IMO 9600657
81,572 2012
3.8
B
1119 GREEN K-MAX 4
IMO 9838084
80,891 2020
3.8
B
1118 SPRING JASMINE
IMO 9942079
63,441 2023
3.8
B
1117 EXELIXSEA
IMO 9476953
76,361 2011
3.8
B
1116 FJ BIANCA
IMO 9866172
81,750 2020
3.8
B
1115 SIBONEY M
IMO 9875018
81,621 2020
3.8
B
1114 ALBATROSS ISLAND
IMO 9421439
61,414 2006
3.8
B
1113 FANTASEA
IMO 9342827
76,596 2006
3.8
B
1123 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.8
B
1122 MAHA YAYA
IMO 9525613
84,108 2013
3.8
B
1127 XIN JI XING
IMO 9256872
76,015 2004
3.8
B
1129 CMB JORDAENS
IMO 9860635
63,447 2019
3.8
B
1126 ASKIO
IMO 9848649
63,464 2020
3.8
B
1131 XH HOPE
IMO 9877925
84,998 2022
3.8
B
1130 NECKLACE
IMO 9548225
92,903 2012
3.8
B
1125 BSM FANGCHENG
IMO 9863819
63,674 2020
3.8
B
1124 YASA SATURN
IMO 9848144
61,075 2019
3.8
B
1128 CL BEIJING
IMO 9649299
81,700 2013
3.8
B
1134 ZERMATT
IMO 9634830
82,026 2013
3.9
B
1133 RED ORCHID
IMO 9757890
61,645 2015
3.9
B
1135 CASSIOPEIA OCEAN
IMO 9837286
81,700 2015
3.9
B
1132 SAVITA NAREE
IMO 9726437
62,971 2016
3.9
B
1138 AMIS WISDOM VI
IMO 9589803
61,456 2011
3.9
B
1139 RI GUAN FENG
IMO 9523146
75,566 2010
3.9
B
1137 FEDERAL ILLINOIS
IMO 9860647
63,386 2019
3.9
B
1142 SEAHUNTER
IMO 9974424
63,253 2024
3.9
B
1141 SM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9842499
80,897 2019
3.9
B
1140 BULK COURAGEOUS
IMO 9659919
61,393 2013
3.9
B
1136 GERTRUDE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9727601
80,959 2016
3.9
B
1143 GLBS MIGHT
IMO 9972804
64,166 2022
3.9
B
1150 LEONARDO
IMO 9894777
63,676 2020
3.9
B
1149 SSI VIGILANT
IMO 9918743
63,861 2022
3.9
B
1148 AKIRA
IMO 9859014
81,782 2019
3.9
B
1147 GENOA
IMO 9805659
60,396 2017
3.9
B
1146 BEAUTY JASMINE
IMO 9721334
63,638 2015
3.9
B
1145 ULTRALAZ
IMO 9781085
64,043 2018
3.9
B
1144 CHLOE
IMO 9749910
81,629 2014
3.9
B
Page 23 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.