Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#692 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-26% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 638 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

120
Q4
134
'27 Q1
86
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
135
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,937 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,916 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,723 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,723 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,025 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,143
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,999–11,933M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,143 of 1,143 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
649 ULTRA ENDURANCE
IMO 1024479
63,719 2025
3.4
A
648 NING MAY
IMO 9891866
85,206 2021
3.4
A
653 ROSTRUM STOIC
IMO 9955911
82,175 2023
3.4
A
657 MOUDROS
IMO 9952414
82,177 2022
3.4
A
656 ZURICH
IMO 9668893
81,922 2014
3.4
A
658 HARVEST FROST
IMO 9643879
95,263 2014
3.4
A
655 HONG DAI
IMO 9563603
76,557 2010
3.4
A
654 SAKIZAYA ELEGANCE
IMO 9713806
81,938 2015
3.4
A
662 AMARYLLIS
IMO 9840491
81,758 2019
3.4
A
661 SSI DIGNITY
IMO 9665360
81,221 2014
3.4
A
663 THEODORE VENIAMIS
IMO 1036032
63,709 2025
3.4
A
660 PUMA MAX
IMO 9589152
81,339 2012
3.4
A
665 GOLDEN ISLAND
IMO 9964869
63,604 2024
3.4
A
664 STAR AQUARIUS
IMO 9715828
60,916 2015
3.4
A
659 DORIC SHOGUN
IMO 9775177
63,347 2016
3.4
A
668 SEACHAMPION
IMO 9936939
82,032 2022
3.4
A
667 PUPLINGE
IMO 9782156
81,672 2016
3.4
A
669 SOCRATES GRAECIA
IMO 9843754
82,057 2020
3.4
A
666 ECHO.GR
IMO 9673836
81,070 2014
3.4
A
672 ETG UBUNTU
IMO 9952907
64,195 2022
3.4
A
671 MSXT THALIA
IMO 9929326
85,204 2022
3.4
A
670 CEPHEUS OCEAN
IMO 9686273
83,000 2015
3.4
A
676 AMIS YOUTH
IMO 9979242
63,720 2024
3.4
A
678 GRAECIA AETERNA
IMO 9689835
81,001 2014
3.4
A
675 MEDI SERAPO
IMO 9811531
87,091 2018
3.4
A
682 BEAGLE
IMO 9731195
81,920 2016
3.4
A
681 CL YANGZHOU
IMO 9703265
81,061 2019
3.4
A
680 BELLEVUE
IMO 9431185
119,346 2011
3.4
A
674 ARIANA
IMO 9828297
81,011 2019
3.4
A
679 NORDIC OASIS
IMO 9727120
75,800 2016
3.4
A
673 JY LONDON
IMO 9867176
81,200 2020
3.4
A
677 ANAFI
IMO 9978602
63,629 2024
3.4
A
684 FAIR LADY
IMO 9342877
76,608 2005
3.5
A
683 RG CERES
IMO 9310288
83,001 2006
3.5
A
687 MALENA
IMO 9852822
81,575 2019
3.5
A
689 GLYFADA I
IMO 9473145
75,639 2009
3.5
A
686 ULTRA PASSION
IMO 9811907
63,472 2017
3.5
A
691 SDM QUANZHOU
IMO 9949259
64,309 2023
3.5
A
690 AMIS XCEL
IMO 9983774
63,739 2024
3.5
A
685 PEAK RAINIER
IMO 9710139
81,070 2015
3.5
A
688 JIN ZHU HAI
IMO 9494383
76,450 2009
3.5
A
700 PRISCILLA
IMO 9880221
82,543 2020
3.5
B
699 LOWLANDS FIDELITY
IMO 9966087
64,028 2023
3.5
B
698 FARAH LOUISE
IMO 9785603
81,886 2017
3.5
B
697 RB LEAH
IMO 9730830
81,334 2017
3.5
B
696 KOULITSA 2
IMO 9639684
78,129 2013
3.5
B
695 PEAK HAKU
IMO 9888467
82,514 2021
3.5
B
694 EMERALD DAISHAN
IMO 9981295
85,516 2023
3.5
B
693 IOANNA FORCE
IMO 9796561
80,982 2017
3.5
B
692 KATAGALAN WISDOM
IMO 9599121
98,697 2012
3.5
B
Page 14 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.