Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#198 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-56% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
152 MSC ANGOLA
IMO 9978729
14,000 TEU 2025
4.2
A
154 MSC RAYA
IMO 9930052
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
151 MSC CELESTINO MARESCA
IMO 9930040
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
153 MSC AAYA
IMO 9927263
14,812 TEU 2022
4.2
A
156 MSC ILENIA
IMO 9962548
202,562 2023
4.2
A
155 MSC MONICA CRISTINA
IMO 9932050
15,264 TEU 2023
4.2
A
157 MSC ORSOLA
IMO 9946726
16,000 TEU 2024
4.2
A
158 MSC MICHEL CAPPELLINI
IMO 9929431
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
159 CMA CGM SCANDOLA
IMO 9859129
14,812 TEU 2020
4.2
A
160 CMA CGM MAUI
IMO 9938157
15,000 TEU 2024
4.2
A
162 CMA CGM HELIUM
IMO 9996721
147,196 2025
4.2
A
161 CMA CGM SYMI
IMO 9867839
15,128 TEU 2022
4.2
A
165 MSC HORTENSE
IMO 9978951
11,400 TEU 2022
4.2
A
164 MSC NICOLA MASTRO
IMO 9930064
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
163 BANGKOK EXPRESS
IMO 9943889
23,660 TEU 2025
4.2
A
166 MAYVIEW MAERSK
IMO 9619995
18,270 TEU 2011
4.2
A
167 MSC IVA
IMO 9962550
202,562 2023
4.2
A
168 ONE FRONTIER
IMO 9934383
15,000 TEU 2023
4.2
A
169 YM TRANQUILITY
IMO 9792682
20,388 TEU 2022
4.2
A
172 HMM GARNET
IMO 9944455
13,248 TEU 2024
4.2
A
171 MSC IVORY COAST
IMO 9974474
8,300 TEU 2024
4.2
A
170 BERLIN EXPRESS
IMO 9540118
23,660 TEU 2023
4.2
A
174 COSCO SHIPPING TAURUS
IMO 9783459
20,038 TEU 2018
4.2
A
173 YM WISDOM
IMO 9757216
14,000 TEU 2015
4.2
A
175 ONE MACKINAC
IMO 9689603
13,900 TEU 2015
4.3
A
177 CMA CGM CHAMPS ELYSEES
IMO 9839131
23,000 TEU 2020
4.3
A
176 ALETTE MAERSK
IMO 9948774
16,592 TEU 2021
4.3
A
179 YM WELLNESS
IMO 9704623
14,080 TEU 2015
4.3
A
178 MSC METTE
IMO 9936630
272,192 2023
4.3
A
181 CMA CGM TROCADERO
IMO 9839167
23,000 TEU 2021
4.3
A
180 MSC QUITTERIE
IMO 9946881
16,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
182 MARSEILLE MAERSK
IMO 9778844
19,630 TEU 2015
4.3
A
183 CMA CGM LOUVRE
IMO 9839143
23,000 TEU 2020
4.3
A
185 COSCO SHIPPING VIRGO
IMO 9783461
20,038 TEU 2018
4.3
A
184 MSC ROSE
IMO 9957359
15,600 TEU 2021
4.3
A
186 ONE TRADITION
IMO 9769300
20,170 TEU 2017
4.3
A
187 MAERSK HALIFAX
IMO 9784271
15,226 TEU 2015
4.3
A
192 MSC MUGE
IMO 9978949
11,400 TEU 2022
4.3
A
191 MADRID MAERSK
IMO 9778791
19,630 TEU 2015
4.3
A
190 MARCHEN MAERSK
IMO 9632143
18,270 TEU 2011
4.3
A
189 MARGRETHE MAERSK
IMO 9632131
18,270 TEU 2011
4.3
A
188 MSC GIUSY
IMO 9947134
16,000 TEU 2023
4.3
A
194 MSC LINZIE
IMO 9987354
16,000 TEU 2025
4.3
A
197 MSC CRAPOLLA
IMO 9963621
15,600 TEU 2025
4.3
A
196 ONE FORTUNE
IMO 9944819
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
195 ONE FOREVER
IMO 9944807
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
193 MARIE MAERSK
IMO 9619933
18,270 TEU 2011
4.3
A
200 MSC CLAUDE GIRARDET
IMO 9936628
271,957 2023
4.3
A
199 OOCL SPAIN
IMO 9908126
24,000 TEU 2020
4.3
A
198 MSC IRINA
IMO 9929429
24,100 TEU 2023
4.3
A
Page 4 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.