Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#226 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-55% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
203 MSC CLAUDE GIRARDET
IMO 9936628
271,957 2023
4.3
A
198 COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
IMO 9795610
20,988 TEU 2018
4.3
A
201 OOCL SPAIN
IMO 9908126
24,000 TEU 2020
4.3
A
204 MSC LORENZA
IMO 9962598
202,562 2024
4.3
A
205 MOSCOW MAERSK
IMO 9778818
19,630 TEU 2015
4.4
A
207 HMM STOCKHOLM
IMO 9868352
23,820 TEU 2020
4.4
A
206 OOCL VALENCIA
IMO 9922598
24,000 TEU 2020
4.4
A
210 MSC MARIE
IMO 9962574
202,562 2024
4.4
A
209 PARANA EXPRESS
IMO 9793909
11,800 TEU 2018
4.4
A
208 OOCL DENMARK
IMO 9922548
24,188 TEU 2020
4.4
A
211 MSC ANNA
IMO 9777204
19,200 TEU 2016
4.4
A
212 MAERSK MC-KINNEY MOLLER
IMO 9619907
18,270 TEU 2011
4.4
A
215 ONE CRANE
IMO 9741401
14,000 TEU 2016
4.4
A
214 HMM PROMISE
IMO 9742168
11,000 TEU 2018
4.4
A
213 MAERSK HORSBURGH
IMO 9784269
15,226 TEU 2015
4.4
A
219 MAGLEBY MAERSK
IMO 9619957
18,270 TEU 2011
4.4
A
218 YM WONDERLAND
IMO 9820910
14,000 TEU 2015
4.4
A
217 MAERSK CAMPTON
IMO 9924211
15,500 TEU 2022
4.4
A
216 MSC LORETO
IMO 9934735
24,000 TEU 2023
4.4
A
220 ZEUS LUMOS
IMO 9864239
15,000 TEU 2021
4.4
A
222 MAERSK HONG KONG
IMO 9784257
14,000 TEU 2017
4.4
A
221 MSC ADYA
IMO 9932921
15,600 TEU 2021
4.4
A
224 MAREN MAERSK
IMO 9632129
18,270 TEU 2011
4.4
A
225 MAERSK CHARLESTON
IMO 9936379
15,500 TEU 2023
4.4
A
223 MAERSK HANGZHOU
IMO 9784300
15,226 TEU 2015
4.4
A
227 ONE MAGDALENA
IMO 9937347
11,923 TEU 2022
4.4
A
226 YM TOPMOST
IMO 9878515
11,714 TEU 2015
4.4
A
229 HMM PERIDOT
IMO 9955258
13,248 TEU 2024
4.4
A
228 ZIM SPINEL
IMO 9968035
7,000 TEU 2024
4.4
A
230 MSC APOLLINE
IMO 9896983
23,656 TEU 2021
4.4
A
231 MAERSK HIDALGO
IMO 9784283
15,226 TEU 2015
4.4
A
235 MSC NAMIBIA
IMO 9974553
8,100 TEU 2025
4.5
A
234 CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN
IMO 9695169
18,982 TEU 2015
4.5
A
233 ZEAL LUMOS
IMO 9864241
15,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
232 HMM NURI
IMO 9869162
14,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
236 SAN LORENZO MAERSK
IMO 9622227
9,669 TEU 2013
4.5
A
237 MSC EDNA
IMO 1016680
139,394 2025
4.5
A
240 MAERSK HUACHO
IMO 9848948
15,226 TEU 2015
4.5
A
238 OOCL JAPAN
IMO 9776195
21,413 TEU 2015
4.5
A
239 MSC LONDON
IMO 9606302
16,000 TEU 2014
4.5
A
242 MURCIA MAERSK
IMO 9780457
19,630 TEU 2015
4.5
A
241 YM TRUTH
IMO 9860910
12,726 TEU 2020
4.5
A
243 MAERSK CANDOR
IMO 9924223
15,500 TEU 2022
4.5
A
244 MANCHESTER MAERSK
IMO 9780445
19,630 TEU 2015
4.5
A
246 CMA CGM TITAN
IMO 9399222
11,400 TEU 2009
4.5
A
245 MORTEN MAERSK
IMO 9632105
18,270 TEU 2011
4.5
A
250 ONE MILANO
IMO 9757187
13,870 TEU 2018
4.5
A
249 MSC AMELIA
IMO 9896995
23,656 TEU 2021
4.5
A
248 OOCL GERMANY
IMO 9776183
21,413 TEU 2015
4.5
A
247 ZEPHYR LUMOS
IMO 9864227
15,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
Page 5 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.