Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,556 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
13.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+155% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1551 STEN NEPTUN
IMO 9322712
16,511 2007
12.7
E
1552 STEN AURORA
IMO 9318565
16,596 2007
12.8
E
1553 XT FORTUNE
IMO 9815628
13,121 2020
12.9
E
1554 NEXUS
IMO 9173032
7,076 1998
12.9
E
1555 SEASHARK
IMO 9298193
32,302 2004
13.1
E
1556 DA HUA SHAN
IMO 9779757
12,972 2017
13.2
E
1557 T.ADALYN
IMO 9830305
14,787 2019
13.3
E
1558 HAI GONG YOU 309
IMO 9153214
12,924 1998
13.3
E
1559 DIVINA
IMO 9377200
15,994 2009
13.4
E
1560 ARDENZA
IMO 9377195
15,994 2009
13.4
E
1561 CHEM HERO
IMO 9402823
16,656 2011
13.4
E
1562 BIT HERO
IMO 9786645
9,921 2018
13.5
E
1563 STEN POSEIDON
IMO 9322700
16,534 2007
13.6
E
1564 BRO NISSUM
IMO 9340623
16,674 2008
13.7
E
1565 T PROCYON
IMO 9569499
19,101 2007
13.7
E
1566 LISCA NERA M
IMO 9436692
42,000 2009
13.7
E
1567 STEN BALTIC
IMO 9307671
16,607 2005
13.7
E
1568 ASTREA
IMO 9488839
11,215 2010
13.7
E
1569 STEN FJELL
IMO 9460241
18,561 2010
13.8
E
1570 BARBARICA
IMO 9383443
18,818 2008
13.8
E
1571 STEN TRITON
IMO 9322695
16,564 2007
14.0
E
1572 LISBON
IMO 9223916
19,783 2000
14.0
E
1573 BRO NUUK
IMO 9323819
16,631 2008
14.0
E
1574 WINDPOWER
IMO 1016056
8,768 2024
14.0
E
1575 STENBERG
IMO 9283978
16,626 2003
14.1
E
1576 THE CHIEF
IMO 9492361
14,953 2013
14.1
E
1577 GIJON KNUTSEN
IMO 9313527
38,150 2006
14.2
E
1578 SINAR MINAHASA
IMO 9433860
12,693 2007
14.2
E
1579 FURE SKAGEN
IMO 9362152
16,958 2008
14.3
E
1580 STEN ARNOLD
IMO 9371610
16,578 2008
14.3
E
1581 DATTILO M
IMO 9333474
21,600 2006
14.3
E
1582 STAV VIKING
IMO 9401556
16,628 2009
14.4
E
1583 SONGA COSMOS
IMO 9457024
25,130 2010
14.4
E
1584 PATALYA
IMO 9305180
16,664 2005
14.5
E
1585 IEVOLI GOLD
IMO 9404376
17,011 2009
14.6
E
1586 SRIWANGI III
IMO 9430739
13,954 2007
14.6
E
1587 STEN MOSTER
IMO 9341184
16,670 2006
14.7
E
1588 STEN HIDRA
IMO 9358931
16,670 2007
14.7
E
1589 BALDO
IMO 9351749
11,999 2005
14.8
E
1590 BAGSHOT
IMO 9938987
17,933 2023
14.9
E
1591 TIGRIS
IMO 9443841
12,919 2008
14.9
E
1592 CHRYSOPIGI
IMO 9303728
38,554 2006
14.9
E
1593 FURE SPEAR
IMO 9409273
16,585 2009
15.0
E
1594 COLORADO STAR
IMO 9527609
13,021 2010
15.1
E
1595 STAVFJORD
IMO 9401544
16,635 2009
15.1
E
1596 MARLIN
IMO 9453638
17,043 2011
15.2
E
1597 CANNETO M
IMO 9359583
21,600 2008
15.2
E
1598 GANGES STAR
IMO 9496692
13,013 2010
15.2
E
1599 SALINA M
IMO 9340910
11,283 2007
15.3
E
1600 EASTERN SPIRAEA
IMO 9909754
11,531 2022
15.5
E
Page 32 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.