Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#735 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-26% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 SEABULK
IMO 9936927
81,996 2022
3.5
B
704 BELGRANO
IMO 9708992
81,870 2015
3.5
B
703 AEOLIAN VICTORY
IMO 9433602
82,152 2010
3.5
B
702 PENGLAI
IMO 9952438
82,236 2023
3.5
B
708 KASPAR OLDENDORFF
IMO 9849825
81,192 2020
3.5
B
707 AQUAPISCES
IMO 9757022
60,238 2016
3.5
B
709 SINCERITY DIVA
IMO 1016135
81,992 2025
3.5
B
706 BBG TIESHAN
IMO 9847401
81,577 2020
3.5
B
705 WESER POINT
IMO 1033688
82,050 2025
3.5
B
711 PAREA
IMO 9433652
80,594 2012
3.5
B
710 XIAO MAY
IMO 9891878
85,180 2021
3.5
B
714 SSI PRIVILEGE II
IMO 1018121
63,651 2025
3.5
B
721 KMAX VISION
IMO 9436654
91,913 2009
3.5
B
713 MANHASSET QUEEN
IMO 9991276
63,654 2024
3.5
B
723 QUEEN RIVER
IMO 1036513
64,183 2025
3.5
B
722 LUCKY GLORY
IMO 9254111
74,269 2001
3.5
B
712 BIRTE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9448047
114,500 2010
3.5
B
719 ELENA
IMO 9336880
82,356 2009
3.5
B
718 KAI OLDENDORFF
IMO 9969807
82,120 2025
3.5
B
717 ZY JUHE
IMO 1015143
63,833 2024
3.5
B
716 ELENI M II
IMO 9838527
62,661 2020
3.5
B
715 SSI DARING II
IMO 1018133
63,643 2025
3.5
B
720 THALASSINI
IMO 9286592
82,977 2005
3.5
B
724 RIPLEY PROSPERITY
IMO 9464417
76,565 2008
3.5
B
725 ARROW LADY
IMO 9304215
76,752 2005
3.5
B
726 POSEIDON VENTURE
IMO 9362229
76,585 2006
3.5
B
734 HIROSHIMA STAR
IMO 9770567
81,789 2017
3.5
B
732 TROODOS AIR
IMO 9698226
84,849 2016
3.5
B
733 UNION GLORY
IMO 9541631
55,088 2010
3.5
B
730 LAUSANNE
IMO 9775385
60,696 2017
3.5
B
731 GREEN K-MAX 1
IMO 9838058
80,856 2019
3.5
B
729 LITO
IMO 9601338
81,970 2012
3.5
B
728 OMICRON SKY
IMO 9330329
77,031 2006
3.5
B
727 CHARM LOONG
IMO 9464390
76,636 2008
3.5
B
738 MEDUSA
IMO 9461130
82,194 2010
3.5
B
739 ZHAO YANG FENG
IMO 9576791
75,396 2012
3.5
B
737 PEDHOULAS ROSE
IMO 9738038
82,068 2017
3.5
B
744 TOKYO QUEEN
IMO 9841287
85,062 2020
3.5
B
740 ATLANTIC SAKURA
IMO 9865348
81,727 2020
3.5
B
736 STAR MARIA
IMO 9401489
82,598 2007
3.5
B
743 JING LU HAI
IMO 9747558
77,927 2015
3.5
B
742 ANTHEA V
IMO 9760043
66,609 2016
3.5
B
741 SDM CHONGQING
IMO 9949235
64,335 2023
3.5
B
735 SHANDONG FU YUAN
IMO 9734769
81,781 2018
3.5
B
745 ELEPHANTA
IMO 9964819
66,301 2023
3.5
B
750 GREEN K-MAX 6
IMO 9862621
80,890 2020
3.5
B
749 BELYAMATO
IMO 9942055
63,696 2022
3.5
B
748 SANTA TERESA
IMO 9852664
63,481 2019
3.5
B
747 CL DAYANG HE
IMO 9880283
80,860 2020
3.5
B
746 CATHARINA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9713923
95,591 2010
3.5
B
Page 15 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.