Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#953 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-17% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 ALPES
IMO 9817470
112,504 2018
4.2
C
952 AMAX ANTHEM
IMO 9472634
116,087 2011
4.2
C
953 CALYPSO
IMO 9899296
111,930 2021
4.3
C
954 LYRIC CAMELLIA
IMO 9730933
109,999 2016
4.3
C
955 GHIBLI
IMO 9417799
112,961 2006
4.3
C
956 SEAJEWEL
IMO 9388807
108,889 2009
4.3
C
957 CL YINGDU
IMO 9718064
50,000 2016
4.3
C
958 BUALA
IMO 9433585
115,592 2010
4.3
C
959 ST. CLEMENS
IMO 9790361
49,998 2017
4.3
C
960 STI GRATITUDE
IMO 9722182
109,999 2017
4.3
C
961 AMFITRITI
IMO 9419369
115,404 2009
4.3
C
962 MINERVA KYTHNOS
IMO 9592252
115,674 2011
4.3
C
963 MAERSK CAYMAN
IMO 9786164
49,919 2018
4.3
C
964 MONTEREY
IMO 9377779
105,009 2007
4.3
C
965 ABHA
IMO 9400980
105,380 2008
4.3
C
966 NORDLOTUS
IMO 9624067
105,543 2013
4.3
C
967 VST ELECTRA
IMO 9784611
109,986 2017
4.3
C
968 GREEN AZURE
IMO 9934644
114,516 2023
4.3
C
969 NISSOS SERIFOS
IMO 9592264
115,688 2012
4.3
C
970 RAYSUT
IMO 9402225
99,995 2009
4.3
C
971 CE-BERMUDA
IMO 9411226
158,143 2009
4.3
C
972 SEA SENOR
IMO 9308950
104,999 2006
4.3
C
973 ALTERA THULE
IMO 9895264
147,098 2022
4.3
C
974 SUNRISE
IMO 9761956
74,042 2016
4.3
C
975 EAGLE HATTERAS
IMO 9453975
114,028 2010
4.3
C
976 AQUALEGACY
IMO 9601833
115,763 2010
4.3
C
977 ATHENS VOYAGER
IMO 9337391
105,614 2007
4.3
C
978 HENRIQUE DIAS
IMO 9453834
157,055 2007
4.3
C
979 SEA FALCON
IMO 9346859
110,295 2007
4.3
C
980 HAFNIA ANDREA
IMO 9688415
50,040 2015
4.3
C
981 PACIFIC SAPPHIRE
IMO 9893058
113,306 2021
4.3
C
982 T.KURUCESME
IMO 9692478
105,171 2015
4.3
C
983 ORANGE STARS
IMO 9433597
115,756 2011
4.3
C
984 SAFEEN ELONA
IMO 9488011
105,258 2012
4.4
C
985 KMARIN RESPECT
IMO 9683001
109,584 2016
4.4
C
986 GEM NO. 3
IMO 9774343
79,920 2014
4.4
C
987 SUNRAY
IMO 9761944
74,039 2014
4.4
C
988 SEAWAYS LONSDALE
IMO 9697612
49,990 2014
4.4
C
989 YASA GOLDEN BOSPHORUS
IMO 9334038
115,867 2007
4.4
C
990 PHOENIX ADMIRAL
IMO 9482603
114,024 2011
4.4
C
991 PENELOP
IMO 9325908
115,091 2006
4.4
C
992 SEAPRINCESS
IMO 9373668
115,948 2008
4.4
C
993 KAMOME VICTORIA
IMO 9584102
74,908 2011
4.4
C
994 CLEAROCEAN APOLLON
IMO 9850707
113,252 2019
4.4
C
995 AQUALEGEND
IMO 9592240
115,571 2012
4.4
C
996 ADVANTAGE SUGAR
IMO 9410973
156,516 2011
4.4
C
997 GRIMSTAD
IMO 9336402
105,850 2007
4.4
C
998 YASA AQUALINA
IMO 9469687
105,304 2011
4.4
C
999 SOUSTA
IMO 9384992
106,045 2007
4.4
C
1000 ASP TREASURES
IMO 9732242
115,063 2016
4.4
C
Page 20 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.