Most Emission-Efficient Bulk Carriers
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
| # | Vessel | Size (DWT) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 594 |
MYRTO
IMO 9518086
|
82,131 | 2013 |
3.4
|
A |
| 603 |
MEGHNA ADVENTURE
IMO 9805764
|
62,472 | 2018 |
3.4
|
A |
| 602 |
YASA TEAM
IMO 9296250
|
75,621 | 2006 |
3.4
|
A |
| 604 |
ZHENG FAN
IMO 9296858
|
87,052 | 2005 |
3.4
|
A |
| 609 |
CL PEKING
IMO 9911599
|
85,174 | 2021 |
3.4
|
A |
| 608 |
HARVEST TIME
IMO 9643881
|
95,263 | 2015 |
3.4
|
A |
| 605 |
MEGHNA LEGACY
IMO 9846275
|
63,449 | 2019 |
3.4
|
A |
| 615 |
LV STAR
IMO 9553218
|
79,252 | 2012 |
3.4
|
A |
| 614 |
KOULITSA 2
IMO 9639684
|
78,129 | 2013 |
3.4
|
A |
| 613 |
MELTEMI
IMO 9952402
|
82,206 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 612 |
MSC CARINA
IMO 9625944
|
104,183 | 2013 |
3.4
|
A |
| 611 |
LEMESSOS WIND
IMO 9516399
|
76,523 | 2009 |
3.4
|
A |
| 610 |
DARYA AUM
IMO 9768605
|
81,109 | 2018 |
3.4
|
A |
| 607 |
AQUAGRACE
IMO 9764087
|
81,672 | 2017 |
3.4
|
A |
| 606 |
LIME ALINA
IMO 9948425
|
85,035 | 2022 |
3.4
|
A |
| 616 |
ROLAND OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463633
|
121,448 | 2007 |
3.5
|
A |
| 617 |
KALEY
IMO 9700689
|
63,283 | 2015 |
3.5
|
A |
| 619 |
PORT OSAKA
IMO 9838541
|
62,716 | 2019 |
3.5
|
A |
| 618 |
BULK CONCORD
IMO 9516387
|
76,600 | 2009 |
3.5
|
A |
| 622 |
SDTR DORA
IMO 9859026
|
81,780 | 2019 |
3.5
|
A |
| 621 |
HG HAMBURG
IMO 9954981
|
64,199 | 2024 |
3.5
|
A |
| 620 |
ARIETTA LILY
IMO 9727479
|
81,773 | 2017 |
3.5
|
A |
| 623 |
SPIRIT OF HO-PING
IMO 9433638
|
82,152 | 2011 |
3.5
|
A |
| 624 |
PAC CHRISTINA
IMO 9913690
|
63,088 | 2022 |
3.5
|
A |
| 627 |
BERGE TATEYAMA
IMO 9866706
|
63,511 | 2020 |
3.5
|
A |
| 626 |
EXCELSIOR DIVA
IMO 9960198
|
63,739 | 2023 |
3.5
|
A |
| 625 |
NAVIOS CITRINE
IMO 9782170
|
81,626 | 2017 |
3.5
|
A |
| 630 |
PORT KYOTO
IMO 9942093
|
63,733 | 2021 |
3.5
|
A |
| 629 |
SDTR GLORIA
IMO 9877896
|
84,983 | 2022 |
3.5
|
A |
| 628 |
EFE MERSIN
IMO 9792022
|
60,000 | 2017 |
3.5
|
A |
| 640 |
BULK SWEDEN
IMO 9691589
|
77,126 | 2014 |
3.5
|
A |
| 632 |
ZHONG CHANG ZHOU SHAN
IMO 9670808
|
75,408 | 2013 |
3.5
|
A |
| 631 |
AQUALIBRA
IMO 9765603
|
63,948 | 2018 |
3.5
|
A |
| 639 |
AEOLIAN BREEZE
IMO 9620621
|
78,092 | 2012 |
3.5
|
A |
| 638 |
MAGIC PERSEUS
IMO 9582477
|
82,158 | 2013 |
3.5
|
A |
| 637 |
RANGER
IMO 9493999
|
82,172 | 2012 |
3.5
|
A |
| 636 |
ACRUX AMELIA
IMO 9909194
|
82,577 | 2021 |
3.5
|
A |
| 635 |
KM HAKATA
IMO 9659830
|
95,349 | 2013 |
3.5
|
A |
| 634 |
BESKIDY
IMO 9582958
|
82,138 | 2013 |
3.5
|
A |
| 633 |
DE MING HAI
IMO 9364746
|
76,431 | 2008 |
3.5
|
A |
| 650 |
IDOMENEAS
IMO 9448035
|
114,167 | 2010 |
3.5
|
A |
| 649 |
BBG HONOR
IMO 9702716
|
81,917 | 2015 |
3.5
|
A |
| 648 |
CS HANGZHOU
IMO 9830070
|
81,600 | 2014 |
3.5
|
A |
| 647 |
JAGUAR MAX
IMO 9589140
|
81,309 | 2012 |
3.5
|
A |
| 646 |
VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
|
81,886 | 2016 |
3.5
|
A |
| 645 |
PLAINPALAIS
IMO 9739032
|
81,756 | 2015 |
3.5
|
A |
| 644 |
SAKIZAYA ELEGANCE
IMO 9713806
|
81,938 | 2015 |
3.5
|
A |
| 643 |
ULTRA JAGUAR
IMO 9723136
|
81,922 | 2016 |
3.5
|
A |
| 642 |
GCL ICON
IMO 9880245
|
82,576 | 2021 |
3.5
|
A |
| 641 |
LONG SHAN HU
IMO 9238507
|
75,679 | 2002 |
3.5
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.