Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,325 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
21.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+112% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 216 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
31
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
29
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,237 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,080 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 ODOARDO AMORETTI
IMO 9361031
15,000 2011
20.1
E
1302 MED SERHAT
IMO 9461922
8,263 2020
20.1
E
1303 GURONI
IMO 9438248
9,016 2010
20.1
E
1304 VS LARA
IMO 9309148
11,276 2006
20.2
E
1305 HACI FATMA ANA
IMO 9458195
8,424 2011
20.3
E
1306 MURRAY STAR
IMO 9527635
13,006 2011
20.3
E
1307 RYSTRAUM
IMO 9391000
9,597 2012
20.4
E
1308 MED ANTARCTIC
IMO 9462316
8,278 2017
20.4
E
1309 DANTE A
IMO 9361029
12,100 2008
20.5
E
1310 NIKE
IMO 9431032
7,770 2009
20.5
E
1311 NQ VIOLA
IMO 9354571
8,817 2006
20.5
E
1312 KATELINA
IMO 9485368
8,933 2014
20.5
E
1313 TANKER BEE 11
IMO 9356646
8,019 2007
20.6
E
1314 KARRUCA
IMO 9216470
7,721 2001
20.7
E
1315 PACIFIC
IMO 9308900
8,151 2008
20.7
E
1316 BOTHNIA
IMO 9485356
8,985 2013
20.7
E
1317 HABIP BAYRAK
IMO 9458183
8,405 2010
20.7
E
1318 BIT ECO
IMO 9786633
9,921 2017
20.8
E
1319 EFE
IMO 9558763
7,623 2010
20.8
E
1320 SEAVEN VOYAGER
IMO 9405796
6,796 2008
20.9
E
1321 IEVOLI SHINE
IMO 9172167
9,887 1998
20.9
E
1322 LAMENTIN
IMO 9377054
11,320 2007
20.9
E
1323 GIOCONDA
IMO 9819052
7,746 2018
21.0
E
1324 GABDULLA TUKAY
IMO 9752498
7,056 2015
21.0
E
1325 MAYOURY
IMO 9777541
9,194 2017
21.1
E
1326 HELGA ESSBERGER
IMO 9172155
9,887 1999
21.2
E
1327 LIA IEVOLI
IMO 9148582
9,976 1999
21.3
E
1328 MED PAKIZE
IMO 9830604
8,219 2020
21.4
E
1329 NQ LAELIA
IMO 9393383
8,115 2008
21.6
E
1330 MED TUNCER
IMO 9830599
8,228 2019
21.6
E
1331 ROSE PG
IMO 9799032
7,420 2017
21.8
E
1332 ANTON
IMO 9514456
8,403 2010
21.8
E
1333 ERICUSA M
IMO 9367372
18,000 2009
22.0
E
1334 MRC MINA
IMO 9464285
7,718 2009
22.0
E
1335 ANNETTE ESSBERGER
IMO 9327059
11,340 2006
22.0
E
1336 FT NERVI
IMO 9447299
7,598 2009
22.1
E
1337 ROLAND ESSBERGER
IMO 9504217
9,124 2013
22.2
E
1338 PETROLINA OCEAN
IMO 9460617
8,066 2009
22.2
E
1339 TUVAQ W.
IMO 9610341
7,595 2012
22.4
E
1340 MED EMRE
IMO 9461910
8,267 2019
22.4
E
1341 GISELA ESSBERGER
IMO 9147734
9,554 1998
22.6
E
1342 CUNO ESSBERGER
IMO 9504190
9,156 2012
22.6
E
1343 CORAL ESSBERGER
IMO 9504205
9,118 2012
22.7
E
1344 SWAN BISCAY
IMO 9466532
6,711 2021
22.8
E
1345 FT QUINTO
IMO 9447304
7,599 2012
22.8
E
1346 HYDRA
IMO 9837341
7,870 2019
22.9
E
1347 NQ LILIUM
IMO 9393395
8,110 2009
23.0
E
1348 SWAN BALTIC
IMO 9466910
6,702 2022
23.1
E
1349 TOSCA
IMO 9870678
7,173 2021
23.8
E
1350 MED BALTIC
IMO 9462304
8,280 2011
23.8
E
Page 27 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.