Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,325 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
21.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+112% higher
E

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 ODOARDO AMORETTI
IMO 9361031
15,000 2012
20.1
E
1302 MED SERHAT
IMO 9461922
8,263 2020
20.1
E
1303 GURONI
IMO 9438248
9,016 2010
20.1
E
1304 VS LARA
IMO 9309148
11,276 2006
20.2
E
1305 HACI FATMA ANA
IMO 9458195
8,424 2011
20.3
E
1306 MURRAY STAR
IMO 9527635
13,006 2011
20.3
E
1307 RYSTRAUM
IMO 9391000
9,597 2012
20.4
E
1308 MED ANTARCTIC
IMO 9462316
8,278 2017
20.4
E
1309 DANTE A
IMO 9361029
12,100 2008
20.5
E
1310 NQ VIOLA
IMO 9354571
8,817 2006
20.5
E
1311 NIKE
IMO 9431032
7,770 2009
20.5
E
1312 KATELINA
IMO 9485368
8,933 2014
20.5
E
1313 TANKER BEE 11
IMO 9356646
8,019 2007
20.6
E
1314 KARRUCA
IMO 9216470
7,721 2001
20.7
E
1315 BOTHNIA
IMO 9485356
8,985 2013
20.7
E
1316 PACIFIC
IMO 9308900
8,151 2008
20.7
E
1317 HABIP BAYRAK
IMO 9458183
8,404 2010
20.7
E
1318 BIT ECO
IMO 9786633
9,921 2017
20.8
E
1319 EFE
IMO 9558763
7,623 2010
20.8
E
1320 SEAVEN VOYAGER
IMO 9405796
6,796 2008
20.9
E
1321 IEVOLI SHINE
IMO 9172167
9,887 1998
20.9
E
1322 LAMENTIN
IMO 9377054
11,320 2007
20.9
E
1323 GIOCONDA
IMO 9819052
7,746 2018
21.0
E
1324 GABDULLA TUKAY
IMO 9752498
7,056 2015
21.0
E
1325 MAYOURY
IMO 9777541
9,194 2017
21.1
E
1326 HELGA ESSBERGER
IMO 9172155
9,887 1999
21.2
E
1327 LIA IEVOLI
IMO 9148582
9,976 1999
21.3
E
1328 MED PAKIZE
IMO 9830604
8,219 2020
21.4
E
1329 NQ LAELIA
IMO 9393383
8,115 2008
21.6
E
1330 MED TUNCER
IMO 9830599
8,227 2019
21.6
E
1331 ROSE PG
IMO 9799032
7,420 2017
21.8
E
1332 ANTON
IMO 9514456
8,402 2010
21.8
E
1333 ERICUSA M
IMO 9367372
18,000 2009
22.0
E
1334 MRC MINA
IMO 9464285
7,718 2009
22.0
E
1335 ANNETTE ESSBERGER
IMO 9327059
11,340 2006
22.0
E
1336 FT NERVI
IMO 9447299
7,598 2009
22.1
E
1337 ROLAND ESSBERGER
IMO 9504217
9,124 2013
22.2
E
1338 PETROLINA OCEAN
IMO 9460617
8,066 2009
22.2
E
1339 TUVAQ W.
IMO 9610341
7,595 2012
22.4
E
1340 MED EMRE
IMO 9461910
8,267 2019
22.4
E
1341 GISELA ESSBERGER
IMO 9147734
9,554 1998
22.6
E
1342 CUNO ESSBERGER
IMO 9504190
9,156 2012
22.6
E
1343 CORAL ESSBERGER
IMO 9504205
9,118 2012
22.7
E
1344 SWAN BISCAY
IMO 9466532
6,711 2021
22.8
E
1345 FT QUINTO
IMO 9447304
7,599 2012
22.8
E
1346 HYDRA
IMO 9837341
7,870 2019
22.9
E
1347 NQ LILIUM
IMO 9393395
8,110 2009
23.0
E
1348 SWAN BALTIC
IMO 9466910
6,702 2008
23.1
E
1349 TOSCA
IMO 9870678
7,173 2021
23.8
E
1350 MED BALTIC
IMO 9462304
8,269 2011
23.8
E
Page 27 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.