Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient LNG Carriers

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#310 of 382 lng carriers
CO₂ intensity
8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (7.4)
+18% higher
E
390
vessels ranked
3.44
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
5.88
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
301 RIBERA DEL DUERO KNUTSEN
IMO 9477593
100,006 2010
8.6
D
302 LOBITO
IMO 9490961
82,929 2011
8.6
D
303 SEAPEAK MERIDIAN
IMO 9369904
81,929 2010
8.6
D
304 CUBAL
IMO 9491812
82,834 2012
8.6
D
305 FEDOR LITKE
IMO 9768370
96,839 2017
8.6
D
306 YAKOV GAKKEL
IMO 9750672
96,839 2019
8.6
E
307 SEAPEAK ARWA
IMO 9339260
82,187 2008
8.7
E
308 LNG KANO
IMO 9311567
83,961 2007
8.8
E
309 AL GHARRAFA
IMO 9337717
113,861 2008
8.8
E
310 RUDOLF SAMOYLOVICH
IMO 9750713
96,703 2018
8.8
E
311 LNG LOKOJA
IMO 9269960
83,965 2006
8.8
E
312 EDUARD TOLL
IMO 9750696
96,839 2017
8.9
E
313 VLADIMIR VORONIN
IMO 9750737
96,840 2019
8.9
E
314 LNG IMO
IMO 9311581
83,684 2008
9.0
E
315 BERGE ARZEW
IMO 9256597
77,470 2004
9.0
E
316 AL SHAMAL
IMO 9360893
116,444 2008
9.1
E
317 GEORGIY USHAKOV
IMO 9750749
96,796 2019
9.1
E
318 NIKOLAY YEVGENOV
IMO 9750725
96,821 2019
9.1
E
319 AL THUMAMA
IMO 9360843
113,749 2008
9.1
E
320 VLADIMIR VIZE
IMO 9750658
96,851 2018
9.1
E
321 SONANGOL BENGUELA
IMO 9482304
89,806 2011
9.2
E
322 NIKOLAY URVANTSEV
IMO 9750660
96,779 2019
9.2
E
323 LENA RIVER
IMO 9629598
84,585 2013
9.3
E
324 LNG OGUN
IMO 9322815
81,997 2007
9.3
E
325 AL GATTARA
IMO 9337705
113,590 2007
9.3
E
326 AL SAHLA
IMO 9360855
113,715 2008
9.3
E
327 ZARGA
IMO 9431214
143,350 2010
9.4
E
328 VLADIMIR RUSANOV
IMO 9750701
96,844 2018
9.4
E
329 POINT FORTIN
IMO 9375721
79,592 2010
9.4
E
330 SONANGOL ETOSHA
IMO 9482299
89,931 2011
9.4
E
331 TEMBEK
IMO 9337731
113,586 2007
9.6
E
332 LNG OYO
IMO 9267003
83,068 2005
9.6
E
333 LNG CROSS RIVER
IMO 9262223
79,591 2005
9.7
E
334 SONANGOL SAMBIZANGA
IMO 9475600
89,742 2007
9.7
E
335 MARAN GAS ASCLEPIUS
IMO 9302499
79,460 2005
9.9
E
336 SEAPEAK METHANE
IMO 9336737
82,115 2008
10.0
E
337 LNG BORNO
IMO 9322803
82,030 2007
10.1
E
338 LNG PHECDA
IMO 9834313
91,712 2020
10.2
E
339 AMUR RIVER
IMO 9317999
84,598 2008
10.4
E
340 AL WAJBAH
IMO 9085625
72,348 1997
10.6
E
341 LNG ONDO
IMO 9311579
83,688 2007
10.9
E
342 LNG ADAMAWA
IMO 9262211
79,566 2005
11.0
E
343 LNG RIVER NIGER
IMO 9262235
79,541 2006
11.0
E
344 LNG AKWA IBOM
IMO 9262209
79,633 2004
11.1
E
345 CADIZ KNUTSEN
IMO 9246578
77,228 2004
11.2
E
346 LNG BENUE
IMO 9267015
82,971 2006
11.4
E
347 SEAPEAK GALICIA
IMO 9247364
79,166 2004
11.6
E
348 AL KHOR
IMO 9085613
72,176 1996
11.8
E
349 AL DAAYEN
IMO 9325702
90,617 2007
12.1
E
350 ARCTIC AURORA
IMO 9645970
84,604 2013
12.2
E
Page 7 of 8 — 382 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.