Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#763 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 CAIFU CHAO
IMO 9725823
19,998 2015
8.5
C
752 MTM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9477567
21,144 2011
8.6
C
753 NAEBA GALAXY
IMO 9791169
26,196 2018
8.6
C
754 MISTRAL WIND
IMO 9907005
33,293 2019
8.6
C
755 GC SAPPHIRE
IMO 9924924
19,993 2022
8.6
C
756 BOCHEM GHENT
IMO 9565649
33,628 2006
8.6
C
757 BOCHEM BUCEPHALAS
IMO 9760550
25,087 2014
8.6
C
758 KRITI JADE
IMO 9391311
50,564 2006
8.6
C
759 ESENTEPE
IMO 9247508
40,250 2004
8.6
C
760 FAIRCHEM PRESTIGE
IMO 9984261
26,328 2021
8.6
C
761 MALBEC LEGEND
IMO 9732814
37,596 2016
8.6
C
762 SEA ALTUS
IMO 9724570
39,999 2017
8.7
C
763 LYDIA KA
IMO 9314844
37,258 2007
8.7
C
764 MARIE C
IMO 9749348
25,161 2014
8.7
C
765 EDGE GALAXY
IMO 9788954
19,946 2017
8.7
C
766 ORCHID MADEIRA
IMO 9367401
21,206 2009
8.7
C
767 OGINO PARK
IMO 9725873
19,992 2017
8.7
C
768 HAFNIA SOYA
IMO 9729271
39,067 2015
8.7
C
769 BOW LION
IMO 9952177
26,021 2023
8.7
C
770 CHEM RANGER
IMO 9490296
26,198 2010
8.7
C
771 STOLT SYCAMORE
IMO 9198563
37,622 2000
8.7
C
772 TIVY GOLD
IMO 9251559
39,999 2003
8.8
C
773 SEASALVIA
IMO 9629550
50,660 2011
8.8
C
774 PROSPERO
IMO 9876828
22,543 2021
8.8
C
775 HAKUBA GALAXY
IMO 9804916
25,183 2021
8.8
C
776 NORDIC MASA
IMO 9451410
20,819 2009
8.8
C
777 STOLT VISION
IMO 9274329
25,147 2005
8.8
C
778 MARINER A
IMO 9288954
40,099 2003
8.8
C
779 GEORGIA
IMO 9302683
40,327 2006
8.8
C
780 CAPELLA
IMO 9278650
32,315 2003
8.8
C
781 KATSUYAMA
IMO 9274678
36,809 2005
8.8
C
782 UOG KORTHI
IMO 9458808
45,553 2010
8.8
C
783 EVA TRUST
IMO 9986037
19,913 2025
8.8
C
784 SEA STRATUS
IMO 9724556
39,999 2017
8.8
C
785 TAKAO GALAXY
IMO 9920069
26,374 2022
8.8
C
786 LUCKY LADY
IMO 9288796
37,432 2005
8.8
C
787 SOLAR NESRIN
IMO 9877626
25,039 2018
8.9
C
788 ULUS
IMO 9314806
37,311 2006
8.9
C
789 PRELUDE
IMO 9360439
39,988 2007
8.9
C
790 ARDMORE CHEROKEE
IMO 9707845
25,215 2013
8.9
C
791 BOW LEOPARD
IMO 9952165
26,004 2023
8.9
C
792 STOLT KIRI
IMO 9266231
19,508 2003
8.9
C
793 ORIENTAL IXIA
IMO 9924728
16,298 2023
8.9
C
794 MOUNT KIBO
IMO 9470997
37,843 2010
9.0
C
795 SEYCHELLES PRELUDE
IMO 9365623
45,680 2007
9.0
C
796 STOLT BOBCAT
IMO 9511167
23,432 2009
9.0
C
797 CUTLASS GALAXY
IMO 9746164
19,985 2015
9.0
C
798 SEA TRADER
IMO 9742077
22,423 2016
9.0
C
799 GINGA PUMA
IMO 9343780
26,046 2006
9.0
C
800 SFL BONAIRE
IMO 9919773
33,338 2023
9.0
C
Page 16 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.