Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Bulk Carriers

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#442 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-33% greener
A
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
404 SYLVANER
IMO 9947275
82,412 2023
3.2
A
403 YM NAVIGATOR
IMO 9518191
81,955 2014
3.2
A
402 ROSTRUM SCEPTIC
IMO 9955923
82,191 2024
3.2
A
401 EOLOS G
IMO 9623738
81,817 2014
3.2
A
409 MONDIAL SUN
IMO 9859296
82,035 2019
3.2
A
408 MEDI GINEVRA
IMO 9815939
87,091 2018
3.2
A
410 STAR NICOLE
IMO 9673783
81,120 2013
3.2
A
407 NORD AQUARIUS
IMO 9941398
82,375 2022
3.2
A
411 POPEYE
IMO 9599078
98,730 2013
3.2
A
406 PM HAYABUSA II
IMO 9926477
63,883 2022
3.2
A
405 GENEVAN TRADER
IMO 9846122
82,226 2020
3.2
A
414 GALAXY GLOBE
IMO 9723629
81,167 2015
3.2
A
413 PACIFIC SOUTH
IMO 9474967
176,000 2012
3.2
A
412 TRITON CENTURY
IMO 9805702
82,079 2018
3.2
A
418 GREAT BLOSSOM
IMO 9986910
82,781 2024
3.2
A
421 TATRY
IMO 9582960
82,138 2013
3.2
A
417 STARDUST
IMO 9591959
78,072 2012
3.2
A
419 ORIENT PEONY
IMO 9946764
82,195 2022
3.2
A
416 SENTOSA CHALLENGER
IMO 9866586
81,601 2020
3.2
A
415 TZOUMAZ
IMO 9694921
89,772 2015
3.2
A
420 CYMONA ENERGY
IMO 9638173
74,867 2012
3.2
A
424 SASEBO GLORY
IMO 9740823
85,020 2016
3.2
A
423 KAVOKAMILI
IMO 9840661
85,141 2020
3.2
A
425 CARLTON TRADER
IMO 9937567
82,237 2023
3.2
A
422 SCARLET ROSELLA
IMO 9609627
82,235 2015
3.2
A
433 GLOBAL FANFARE
IMO 9969027
63,734 2023
3.2
A
432 JOSCO SHENGZHOU
IMO 9934175
64,250 2022
3.2
A
431 BENTLEY
IMO 9847891
80,856 2019
3.2
A
430 NORDIC NULUUJAAK
IMO 9884966
95,758 2021
3.2
A
429 RICH AZURE
IMO 9950648
64,452 2023
3.2
A
428 CRIMSON EMPRESS
IMO 9485021
82,250 2014
3.2
A
427 JEWEL
IMO 9567037
175,784 2006
3.2
A
426 MARAN VOYAGER
IMO 9458688
179,718 2010
3.2
A
435 ANDERMATT
IMO 9738791
77,113 2015
3.2
A
437 ATLANTIC SAMURAI
IMO 9783980
81,725 2019
3.2
A
434 DONNA ALEXANDRA
IMO 9950595
82,183 2023
3.2
A
441 IONIC KALLIRHOE
IMO 9796195
84,769 2020
3.2
A
440 LIEFDE
IMO 9961934
82,725 2024
3.2
A
438 XING YANG HAI
IMO 9949297
85,016 2022
3.2
A
439 KEY JOURNEY
IMO 9433640
80,591 2012
3.2
A
436 NORDIC QINNGUA
IMO 9884978
95,709 2021
3.2
A
450 YANGZE 21
IMO 9602368
82,122 2012
3.2
A
449 CARDIFF
IMO 9966568
90,014 2024
3.2
A
448 ERMIS
IMO 9723643
81,175 2016
3.2
A
447 GLORY CUIABA
IMO 9311189
75,886 2008
3.2
A
446 SWANSEA
IMO 9966570
90,023 2021
3.2
A
445 AM JYOTI
IMO 9880233
82,603 2020
3.2
A
444 KYPROS LAND
IMO 9667368
77,060 2014
3.2
A
443 CL TAIZHOU
IMO 9747314
81,119 2019
3.2
A
442 FORTE SAO MARCELO
IMO 9939072
121,669 2021
3.2
A
Page 9 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.