Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,843 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-2% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 FEDERAL TIBER
IMO 9644483
55,160 2013
4.5
C
1802 VIRGO STELLAR
IMO 9384540
58,663 2008
4.5
C
1803 BBG MASTER
IMO 9721982
63,650 2016
4.5
C
1804 BUBBA BOOSH
IMO 9674218
55,464 2014
4.5
C
1805 HAWK S
IMO 1082782
40,576 2025
4.5
C
1806 SIIRT
IMO 9644196
63,200 2013
4.5
C
1807 SUN PLENTY
IMO 9423554
58,729 2009
4.5
C
1808 MALAK
IMO 9446702
56,942 2010
4.5
C
1809 SEABONI
IMO 9688647
62,657 2015
4.5
C
1810 XIN HAI TONG 38
IMO 9622784
56,635 2011
4.5
C
1811 CAPE KOURION
IMO 9481441
79,463 2006
4.5
C
1812 FEDERAL TRIDENT
IMO 9658977
55,178 2016
4.5
C
1813 TAI HOMAGE
IMO 1014931
39,983 2022
4.5
C
1814 ARIS T
IMO 9343895
92,524 2007
4.5
C
1815 JNS FRIENDSHIP
IMO 1061520
40,537 2024
4.5
C
1816 PMS SEAGULL
IMO 9614971
61,358 2012
4.5
C
1817 AL MAQAM
IMO 9672040
63,155 2014
4.5
C
1818 GREAT VISION
IMO 9728681
63,376 2016
4.6
C
1819 AZUL
IMO 9726504
63,253 2014
4.6
C
1820 THOR CALIBER
IMO 9440928
58,732 2008
4.6
C
1821 STEEL C
IMO 9700330
63,118 2015
4.6
C
1822 YASA BEGONIA
IMO 9991654
40,541 2025
4.6
C
1823 GUARDIAN
IMO 9714692
61,202 2013
4.6
C
1824 SHARP ISLAND
IMO 9748370
61,244 2016
4.6
C
1825 MUSALA
IMO 9937294
32,223 2023
4.6
C
1826 SHENG HENG HAI
IMO 9505493
56,649 2013
4.6
C
1827 KANG HONG
IMO 9323558
55,589 2005
4.6
C
1828 COOPER ISLAND
IMO 9668910
57,905 2014
4.6
C
1829 IONIAN CHALLENGER
IMO 9461350
82,245 2010
4.6
C
1830 NEW EXCELLENCE
IMO 9502594
79,449 2014
4.6
C
1831 W-SAPPHIRE
IMO 9605645
81,681 2012
4.6
C
1832 XIN HAI TONG 802
IMO 9603972
81,610 2012
4.6
C
1833 FEDERAL TAKASE
IMO 9658989
55,178 2011
4.6
C
1834 RED FIN
IMO 9607306
56,780 2011
4.6
C
1835 LEMESSOS NAPA
IMO 9741293
77,998 2014
4.6
C
1836 XIN AN YUAN
IMO 9407873
55,277 2009
4.6
C
1837 NORSE OMISHIMA
IMO 9990674
40,006 2025
4.6
C
1838 SKYWALKER
IMO 9724740
63,350 2015
4.6
C
1839 VELA PRIME
IMO 9218272
73,105 2001
4.6
C
1840 OAK BAY
IMO 9652557
55,845 2013
4.6
C
1841 BROAD GLORY
IMO 9324643
52,415 2006
4.6
C
1842 ANNA SMILE
IMO 9280770
74,823 2004
4.6
C
1843 HERCULES
IMO 9642382
75,200 2013
4.6
C
1844 EVANGELISTRIA
IMO 9383857
75,750 2008
4.6
C
1845 LEON
IMO 9303871
55,730 2006
4.6
C
1846 OMICRON TITINA
IMO 9304277
76,806 2005
4.6
C
1847 STAR WAVE
IMO 9746009
61,491 2017
4.6
C
1848 GLOBAL PRIME
IMO 9658941
56,013 2014
4.6
C
1849 SEARIDER
IMO 9698953
62,690 2015
4.6
C
1850 KN FOREST
IMO 9558268
58,037 2013
4.6
C
Page 37 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.