Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#814 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-24% greener
C

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 266 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 858 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

386
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (386 of 386 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
802 NOVO
IMO 9633446
162,028 2012
3.8
C
801 ELANDRA BAY
IMO 9821691
115,674 2018
3.8
C
803 OLIB
IMO 9334739
108,433 2009
3.8
C
804 GALWAY SPIRIT
IMO 9312858
105,559 2007
3.9
C
805 STI SPIGA
IMO 9708148
109,999 2015
3.9
C
806 ARISTARCHOS
IMO 9788394
79,905 2017
3.9
C
811 ALICANTE
IMO 9527855
115,707 2013
3.9
C
810 FRONT OCELOT
IMO 9726580
109,900 2016
3.9
C
809 PROTEUS TRACY
IMO 9923449
109,999 2023
3.9
C
808 SANMAR SONATINA
IMO 9409479
74,997 2008
3.9
C
807 NEW ABILITY
IMO 9361512
105,381 2008
3.9
C
812 EPICURUS
IMO 9737096
79,945 2017
3.9
C
813 AGIOS GERASIMOS
IMO 9693056
109,999 2015
3.9
C
814 ALEXANDER
IMO 9826720
113,170 2017
3.9
C
818 MINERVA OLYMPIA
IMO 9787194
114,780 2019
3.9
C
817 HAFNIA KALLANG
IMO 9766190
74,189 2017
3.9
C
816 SEBAROK SPIRIT
IMO 9572264
109,554 2011
3.9
C
815 BAKER SPIRIT
IMO 9408073
156,928 2009
3.9
C
819 GUANYIN
IMO 9299707
109,857 2005
3.9
C
821 ABU DHABI-III
IMO 9489027
105,131 2011
3.9
C
820 MINERVA GLORIA
IMO 9382750
115,873 2009
3.9
C
823 JAG LARA
IMO 9488023
105,258 2007
3.9
C
822 MINERVA ARIES
IMO 9412177
105,483 2006
3.9
C
825 DUBAI CHARM
IMO 9402495
115,514 2010
3.9
C
824 ALMI VOYAGER
IMO 9579585
157,638 2014
3.9
C
828 SINBAD
IMO 9413688
115,928 2009
3.9
C
827 LISBOA
IMO 9765158
155,723 2017
3.9
C
832 HAI SHANG
IMO 9792852
109,900 2018
3.9
C
826 JOSE DO PATROCINIO
IMO 9453860
157,055 2007
3.9
C
831 PRIMERO
IMO 9741815
106,329 2016
3.9
C
830 NEMO
IMO 9313498
105,773 2008
3.9
C
829 MARETA
IMO 9537927
115,795 2013
3.9
C
833 LANCING
IMO 9792046
104,074 2018
3.9
C
836 NEAPOLIS
IMO 9792199
73,937 2018
3.9
C
835 SUEZ ENCHANTED
IMO 9318084
159,233 2007
3.9
C
834 SEALEO
IMO 9473066
107,505 2012
3.9
C
837 STI LOMBARD
IMO 9708150
109,999 2015
3.9
C
842 DOLPHIN PEARL
IMO 9402237
114,824 2006
4.0
C
841 DUBAI ATTRACTION
IMO 9422536
115,459 2011
4.0
C
840 CALIDA
IMO 9522128
115,812 2008
4.0
C
847 NAVIG8 PRESTIGE JKB
IMO 9831309
111,000 2019
4.0
C
846 NORTH SEA
IMO 9760495
106,340 2016
4.0
C
845 ALFRED
IMO 9826897
113,159 2018
4.0
C
844 ADAM
IMO 9826732
113,226 2018
4.0
C
843 NISSOS PAROS
IMO 9592290
115,722 2010
4.0
C
839 PACIFIC RAWAN
IMO 9772022
109,999 2017
4.0
C
838 SFL TIGER
IMO 9664809
121,225 2015
4.0
C
849 IONIC ANASSA
IMO 9779795
114,718 2016
4.0
C
848 NAMRATA
IMO 9401154
105,830 2008
4.0
C
850 ADVANTAGE START
IMO 9466570
156,644 2011
4.0
C
Page 17 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.