Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#30 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
1.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-65% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 FRONT PRINCE
IMO 9788899
301,187 2017
1.3
A
2 MARIA A. ANGELICOUSSIS
IMO 9930789
320,916 2021
1.5
A
3 ADAMANTIOS
IMO 9905447
299,983 2020
1.6
A
4 ADVANTAGE VITAL
IMO 9933561
299,590 2023
1.6
A
5 MARAN DIONE
IMO 9930806
320,916 2023
1.6
A
6 MARAN DANAE
IMO 9930791
320,916 2021
1.6
A
7 SEAWAYS ENDEAVOR
IMO 9933573
299,365 2023
1.6
A
8 EAGLE VENTURA
IMO 9933614
299,407 2023
1.6
A
10 FRONT EIRA
IMO 9855331
299,995 2019
1.7
A
9 ADVANTAGE VERDICT
IMO 9933535
299,451 2022
1.7
A
11 LONDON VOYAGER
IMO 9834454
318,608 2019
1.7
A
12 FRONT TWEED
IMO 9920784
299,986 2022
1.7
A
14 NEW SPLENDOR
IMO 9911991
307,469 2023
1.7
A
13 ASCONA
IMO 9828338
299,999 2019
1.7
A
16 FRONT GANDER
IMO 9937098
300,018 2023
1.7
A
15 EAGLE VELLORE
IMO 9933602
299,554 2023
1.7
A
17 ANTONIS I. ANGELICOUSSIS
IMO 9930777
320,916 2021
1.7
A
18 VL BRILLIANT
IMO 9683673
319,300 2014
1.7
A
20 NEW PROSPERITY
IMO 9689988
318,329 2015
1.8
A
19 NEW WEALTH
IMO 9706384
318,705 2017
1.8
A
24 ADVANTAGE VICTORY
IMO 9933547
299,468 2022
1.8
A
21 YUAN GUI YANG
IMO 9843302
319,702 2020
1.8
A
25 ESTEEM ASTRO
IMO 9838008
312,105 2015
1.8
A
23 NEW VISION
IMO 9799202
307,434 2019
1.8
A
22 YUAN FU YANG
IMO 9843314
319,668 2021
1.8
A
26 MORNING HOPE
IMO 9789283
300,927 2015
1.8
A
28 NISSOS KEROS
IMO 9856074
318,953 2017
1.8
A
27 MARAN APHRODITE
IMO 9810381
319,398 2016
1.8
A
29 OLYMPIC LUNA
IMO 9731157
299,337 2017
1.8
A
31 OLYMPUS
IMO 9941661
301,850 2017
1.8
A
30 FRONT DISCOVERY
IMO 9830109
298,952 2019
1.8
A
32 EAGLE VERSAILLES
IMO 9597276
320,500 2010
1.8
A
33 ALMI ATLAS
IMO 9816323
315,221 2018
1.8
A
36 NISSOS KYTHNOS
IMO 9853852
318,744 2019
1.9
A
35 SEAWAYS GIBBS HILL
IMO 9885594
299,942 2020
1.9
A
34 AGIOS NIKOLAS
IMO 9845506
363,186 2019
1.9
A
38 FRONT TANA
IMO 9933640
299,988 2022
1.9
A
37 SANAM
IMO 9858486
299,999 2020
1.9
A
40 DHT APPALOOSA
IMO 9826122
318,918 2017
1.9
A
39 AMAD
IMO 9783693
298,705 2018
1.9
A
41 SEAVOICE
IMO 9877755
299,989 2020
1.9
A
43 FRONT ALTA
IMO 9920772
299,979 2022
1.9
A
42 ADVANTAGE VISION
IMO 9933559
299,455 2023
1.9
A
44 CASPAR
IMO 9926661
299,847 2022
1.9
A
45 SEAWAYS ENTERPRISE
IMO 9933585
299,365 2023
1.9
A
47 FRONT DUCHESS
IMO 9771341
299,441 2017
1.9
A
46 HUNTER
IMO 9896414
299,940 2021
1.9
A
50 EAGLE VICTORIA
IMO 9739513
299,392 2016
1.9
A
49 KASSAB
IMO 9783710
298,721 2018
1.9
A
48 NEW COROLLA
IMO 9900679
307,552 2021
1.9
A
Page 1 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.