Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#52 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
1.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-64% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
50 TWIN CASTOR
IMO 9625956
321,039 2013
1.9
A
52 NEW MELODY
IMO 9799185
307,431 2019
1.9
A
54 NEW JOURNEY
IMO 9799197
307,569 2019
1.9
A
53 EAGLE VALENCE
IMO 9910234
289,999 2022
1.9
A
55 GRAND AMBITION
IMO 9909807
299,988 2021
1.9
A
56 HALCYON
IMO 9885594
299,942 2020
1.9
A
57 GRAND BONANZA
IMO 9915569
299,988 2021
1.9
A
58 FRONT OSEN
IMO 9728708
298,991 2016
1.9
A
59 XIN WEI YANG
IMO 9761475
308,313 2017
1.9
A
61 SOPHIA
IMO 9776559
319,398 2017
1.9
A
60 NEW RENOWN
IMO 9759604
318,926 2017
1.9
A
63 UNIVERSAL PARTNER
IMO 9837614
299,981 2019
1.9
A
62 FRONT TYNE
IMO 9933676
299,985 2023
1.9
A
64 DHT OSPREY
IMO 9734111
299,999 2016
1.9
A
66 NEW MERIT
IMO 9706396
318,348 2017
1.9
A
65 MARAN MIRA
IMO 9870800
299,995 2020
1.9
A
67 C. GENUINE
IMO 9929663
300,419 2022
1.9
A
69 MARAN ARES
IMO 9796872
319,398 2017
1.9
A
68 KHK EMPRESS
IMO 9830965
314,014 2017
1.9
A
71 NAVIGARE TERRA MATER
IMO 9740330
297,638 2017
1.9
A
70 EAGLE VALLERY
IMO 9910246
299,473 2022
1.9
A
72 SEAWAYS LIBERTY
IMO 9727027
300,973 2016
1.9
A
74 LITA
IMO 9819870
302,520 2015
1.9
A
73 COSLUCKY LAKE
IMO 9791236
310,574 2017
1.9
A
76 NEW COROLLA
IMO 9900679
307,552 2021
2.0
A
75 HILLAH
IMO 9890977
313,166 2018
2.0
A
80 MORNING HOPE
IMO 9789283
300,927 2015
2.0
A
82 MARAN ANTIOPE
IMO 9901348
318,482 2021
2.0
A
81 DIAS I
IMO 9858474
299,999 2020
2.0
A
79 NEW VANGUARD
IMO 9445631
297,115 2011
2.0
A
78 ATLANTAS
IMO 9389899
321,300 2010
2.0
A
77 NISSOS DESPOTIKO
IMO 9845697
318,744 2019
2.0
A
84 COSFLOURISH LAKE
IMO 9783356
308,152 2017
2.0
A
83 KIRKUK
IMO 9829655
320,596 2019
2.0
A
86 DHT SUNDARBANS
IMO 9590876
318,123 2012
2.0
A
85 GEORGIOS
IMO 9389033
299,999 2009
2.0
A
87 ALMI ATLAS
IMO 9816323
315,221 2018
2.0
A
88 AMAD
IMO 9783693
298,705 2018
2.0
A
90 NEW PROSPERITY
IMO 9689988
318,329 2015
2.0
A
89 APHRODITE
IMO 9874210
302,109 2017
2.0
A
92 NISSOS KEROS
IMO 9856074
318,953 2017
2.0
A
91 KHK MAJESTY
IMO 9830977
314,014 2017
2.0
A
93 BAGHDAD
IMO 9876414
313,433 2020
2.0
A
95 XIN MAO YANG
IMO 9771755
307,573 2018
2.0
A
94 NEW TRIUMPH
IMO 9689990
318,239 2015
2.0
A
97 SEAPASSION
IMO 9783734
299,271 2017
2.0
A
96 ALMI HYDRA
IMO 9583720
319,357 2013
2.0
A
98 FRONT FORTH
IMO 9739501
299,392 2016
2.0
A
100 NISSOS KEA
IMO 9920758
300,323 2022
2.0
A
99 NISSOS NIKOURIA
IMO 9920760
300,323 2022
2.0
A
Page 2 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.