Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#750 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-9% greener
C

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 ZEVULUN
IMO 9405540
51,522 2010
8.1
C
702 HUANG SHAN 16
IMO 9967940
19,884 2023
8.2
C
703 BOCHEM BRISBANE
IMO 9973315
26,564 2024
8.2
C
704 WAN CHENG
IMO 9234587
46,764 2002
8.2
C
705 BOW TITANIUM
IMO 9777395
27,601 2018
8.2
C
706 NAVIG8 UNIVERSE
IMO 9489106
45,313 2013
8.2
C
707 STENA CONVOY
IMO 9543110
49,999 2022
8.2
C
708 FUTURA
IMO 9293961
40,085 2006
8.2
C
709 VALDARNO
IMO 9717503
39,208 2015
8.2
C
710 STOLT ISLAND
IMO 9414058
43,593 2009
8.2
C
711 STOLT MAPLE
IMO 9764491
32,825 2017
8.2
C
712 SFL ARUBA
IMO 9919761
33,325 2022
8.2
C
713 CIELO DI GAETA
IMO 9669653
39,990 2014
8.2
C
714 OTTO H
IMO 9749374
25,161 2016
8.2
C
715 MTM HAMBURG
IMO 9379844
20,564 2008
8.2
C
716 STOLT VANGUARD
IMO 9274305
25,261 2004
8.2
C
717 CONTI GREENLAND
IMO 9391397
37,599 2008
8.2
C
718 MAC LONDON
IMO 9296872
19,999 2003
8.2
C
719 ATLAS
IMO 9538177
37,866 2014
8.3
C
720 RED DIAMOND
IMO 9583665
51,034 2012
8.3
C
721 ESTEEM SANGO
IMO 9900461
19,980 2021
8.3
C
722 THUN VENERN
IMO 9739824
17,998 2018
8.3
C
723 STOLT VIRTUE
IMO 9274317
25,230 2004
8.3
C
724 LYCIA KA
IMO 9327384
37,091 2006
8.3
C
725 PRAGUE
IMO 9421324
49,999 2008
8.3
C
726 BOW CAROLINE
IMO 9367554
33,609 2009
8.3
C
727 EASTERLY LIME GALAXY
IMO 9380972
19,992 2008
8.3
C
728 FAIRCHEM VALOR
IMO 9791195
22,292 2019
8.3
C
729 CB BALTIC
IMO 9851701
37,874 2020
8.3
C
730 CHERRY TONDA
IMO 9288942
39,999 2004
8.3
C
731 RED OPAL
IMO 9381512
40,099 2010
8.3
C
732 ARGOLIS
IMO 9326524
40,083 2007
8.3
C
733 CB ADRIATIC
IMO 9851696
37,836 2019
8.3
C
734 CHEM STAR 1
IMO 9731731
27,125 2016
8.3
C
735 BOW ARCHITECT
IMO 9319480
30,058 2005
8.3
C
736 SEA LA BELLE
IMO 9380374
49,995 2008
8.3
C
737 GELIBOLU
IMO 9314832
37,311 2006
8.4
C
738 GINGA ANGEL
IMO 9809394
25,245 2020
8.4
C
739 CHEMROAD SEA
IMO 9565730
33,560 2011
8.4
C
740 FENICUSA M
IMO 9381500
40,036 2008
8.4
C
741 NORDIC CALLAO
IMO 9796822
26,029 2019
8.4
C
742 CB CARIBIC
IMO 9851713
37,822 2020
8.4
C
743 SUPER G
IMO 9418121
50,747 2010
8.4
C
744 EK-RIVER
IMO 9808259
19,884 2018
8.4
C
745 GINGA COPPER
IMO 9829758
25,183 2019
8.4
C
746 SAGAMI
IMO 9379911
33,614 2008
8.4
C
747 BOCHEM MUMBAI
IMO 9565637
33,636 2006
8.4
C
748 HTM WARRIOR
IMO 9399911
50,576 2009
8.4
C
749 GINGA LINGER
IMO 9893448
25,064 2021
8.5
C
750 CAIFU CHAO
IMO 9725823
19,998 2015
8.5
C
Page 15 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.