Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#670 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-15% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
651 NOCTURNE
IMO 9804863
37,245 2020
7.9
C
652 NCC DANAH
IMO 9419541
45,579 2011
7.9
C
653 BOW AQUARIUS
IMO 9753791
40,900 2016
7.9
C
656 HAFNIA TORRES
IMO 9729283
39,067 2016
7.9
C
655 GC BERYL
IMO 9924912
19,994 2021
7.9
C
654 SAANA
IMO 9739836
17,999 2018
7.9
C
658 ALDEBARAN
IMO 9723007
37,887 2014
8.0
C
657 LADY RINA
IMO 9631383
39,310 2012
8.0
C
659 DYLAN
IMO 9421336
50,319 2009
8.0
C
660 STOLT ARGON
IMO 9739288
27,579 2016
8.0
C
661 BOW CARDINAL
IMO 9114244
37,446 1997
8.0
C
662 NCC QAMAR
IMO 9387671
46,195 2009
8.0
C
663 ELENORE
IMO 9335836
34,497 2010
8.0
C
665 STOLT PALM
IMO 9764506
32,761 2018
8.0
C
664 AFOVOS
IMO 9428346
49,999 2009
8.0
C
666 SAKURA ADVANCE
IMO 9568495
27,000 2010
8.0
C
668 CHEM STELLAR
IMO 9731755
27,128 2014
8.0
C
667 BOW HARMONY
IMO 9379909
33,619 2008
8.0
C
669 NCC SAFA
IMO 9411329
45,471 2011
8.0
C
670 MIAMI LIGHT
IMO 9724702
45,999 2017
8.0
C
671 MTM AMSTERDAM
IMO 9776444
21,176 2018
8.0
C
673 INFINITY AQUILA
IMO 9258600
47,122 2004
8.0
C
672 DARNIA
IMO 9336464
45,704 2017
8.0
C
675 TRUST GALAXY
IMO 9860192
21,020 2019
8.0
C
674 CAROLINE
IMO 9262091
45,999 2002
8.0
C
676 STOLT LARIX
IMO 9617650
30,297 2015
8.1
C
677 CLEAN IMPERIAL
IMO 9376854
39,998 2009
8.1
C
678 KAMUI GALAXY
IMO 9942653
26,400 2022
8.1
C
680 NCC NASMA
IMO 9459008
45,550 2011
8.1
C
679 PORTARIA
IMO 9464326
36,677 2007
8.1
C
681 CHEM ORCHARD
IMO 9937983
33,354 2024
8.1
C
682 NCC AMAL
IMO 9411317
45,544 2011
8.1
C
683 STOLT FOCUS
IMO 9214305
37,467 2001
8.1
C
684 TSUKUBA GALAXY
IMO 9796834
26,175 2020
8.1
C
686 KRITI CAPTAIN
IMO 9335147
37,434 2007
8.1
C
685 BOCHEM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9955478
26,599 2021
8.1
C
687 SEA RUNNER
IMO 9442720
50,352 2008
8.1
C
688 RAMELIA
IMO 9818280
17,994 2019
8.1
C
689 BOW PROSPER
IMO 9866770
36,221 2020
8.1
C
690 GOLDEN PALM
IMO 1055882
18,421 2025
8.1
C
693 STELLA MARIA
IMO 9407378
44,999 2008
8.1
C
692 STOLT COBALT
IMO 9739305
27,606 2016
8.1
C
691 ECO REVOLUTION
IMO 9725598
39,208 2016
8.1
C
698 CELESTE I
IMO 9250488
46,350 2003
8.1
C
697 CHEM SPARK
IMO 9731743
27,128 2016
8.1
C
696 EASTERLY CANYON
IMO 9383974
36,677 2009
8.1
C
695 METEORA
IMO 9322944
40,046 2009
8.1
C
694 JKT MIRACLE
IMO 9278662
33,573 2004
8.1
C
700 CAPIBARA
IMO 9267027
38,877 2004
8.1
C
699 ZEVULUN
IMO 9405540
51,522 2010
8.1
C
Page 14 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.