Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#427 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-33% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
402 XH SQUARE LEG
IMO 1019852
83,055 2024
3.1
A
404 MEDI AMALFI
IMO 9781982
87,605 2017
3.1
A
401 CAPE PROTEUS
IMO 9460655
180,585 2011
3.1
A
400 BETEIGEUZE
IMO 9313280
77,089 2007
3.1
A
405 CANARIAS
IMO 1067017
82,221 2025
3.1
A
406 YM COURAGE
IMO 9959943
81,980 2023
3.1
A
407 ROSTRUM HEDONIST
IMO 9955894
82,178 2023
3.1
A
409 DONATELLO
IMO 1030818
82,000 2025
3.1
A
416 SAFEEN AL AMAN
IMO 9490129
83,027 2012
3.1
A
408 ALPHA PRIDE
IMO 9827528
82,032 2019
3.1
A
417 BTG MISTI
IMO 9952488
82,235 2023
3.1
A
410 BBG GUIJIANG
IMO 9971939
82,799 2024
3.1
A
415 EVER EXCELLENT
IMO 9899806
81,935 2021
3.1
A
414 INTERCEPTOR
IMO 9835965
82,009 2019
3.1
A
413 BASTIONS
IMO 9431173
119,376 2011
3.1
A
412 GH HELM
IMO 9438781
180,018 2009
3.1
A
411 LOWLANDS PATRASCHE
IMO 9979137
63,458 2024
3.1
A
421 JAG AKSHAY
IMO 9706554
82,044 2016
3.2
A
420 OLIVIA C
IMO 9710555
81,800 2015
3.2
A
422 ORANGE HARMONY
IMO 9764099
81,739 2017
3.2
A
419 TEKUNG BENEFIT
IMO 9984168
63,553 2024
3.2
A
426 OWUSU MARU
IMO 9888479
82,506 2020
3.2
A
425 FOXTON
IMO 9966582
90,029 2024
3.2
A
424 AMAZING SALUTE
IMO 9477232
107,288 2011
3.2
A
418 IRINA
IMO 9723655
81,600 2016
3.2
A
423 BULK FINLAND
IMO 9691577
77,126 2010
3.2
A
427 PRT KAHO
IMO 9701152
77,113 2014
3.2
A
430 JAG AJAY
IMO 9723849
82,000 2016
3.2
A
433 NAVIOS BUENA VENTURA
IMO 9481233
179,108 2006
3.2
A
429 SKIATHOS
IMO 9952476
82,219 2023
3.2
A
435 MAGMA TENACITY
IMO 9967689
63,709 2023
3.2
A
434 EMERALD PUTUO
IMO 9936240
85,610 2022
3.2
A
428 BORA
IMO 9607112
82,000 2014
3.2
A
431 JOSCO SHENGZHOU
IMO 9934175
64,250 2022
3.2
A
432 XIN HAI TONG 811
IMO 9639567
81,504 2013
3.2
A
437 ATLANTIC BONANZA
IMO 9952505
82,143 2024
3.2
A
439 CYMONA PRIDE
IMO 9694488
78,056 2014
3.2
A
436 SPIKE
IMO 9976628
64,046 2024
3.2
A
441 WOOYANG IVY
IMO 9782326
63,590 2017
3.2
A
440 CHAMPIONSHIP
IMO 9403516
180,000 2011
3.2
A
438 NORD KARAS
IMO 9552991
82,354 2016
3.2
A
450 ULTRA LEOPARD
IMO 9758428
81,777 2016
3.2
A
449 GOLDEN FRIDGE
IMO 9955595
84,508 2023
3.2
A
448 KARPATY
IMO 9582506
82,138 2013
3.2
A
447 FJ CAMELIA
IMO 9911769
82,501 2021
3.2
A
446 NAVIOS LIBRA
IMO 9852925
82,011 2019
3.2
A
445 ATHINA ZAFIRAKIS
IMO 9801201
81,630 2017
3.2
A
444 XING FU HAI
IMO 9949302
85,038 2022
3.2
A
443 PAN CONCORD
IMO 9966855
82,814 2024
3.2
A
442 UNITY SAKURA
IMO 9782209
84,808 2016
3.2
A
Page 9 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.