Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#573 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-37% greener
B
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
551 SPEED
IMO 9475698
13,100 TEU 2012
6.4
B
553 MSC CHLOE
IMO 9720483
9,400 TEU 2016
6.4
B
552 MSC YASHI B
IMO 9778090
11,000 TEU 2018
6.4
B
555 VALPARAISO EXPRESS
IMO 9777589
10,818 TEU 2016
6.4
B
554 CMA CGM CENDRILLON
IMO 9449819
8,500 TEU 2009
6.4
B
556 MAERSK CAPE COAST
IMO 9525314
4,500 TEU 2011
6.4
B
557 CARTAGENA EXPRESS
IMO 9777618
10,818 TEU 2017
6.4
B
560 NYK ORION
IMO 9312999
9,040 TEU 2008
6.4
B
559 CAP SAN VINCENT
IMO 9717228
10,600 TEU 2015
6.4
B
558 CMA CGM DALILA
IMO 9450624
8,500 TEU 2011
6.4
B
562 CMA CGM TITAN
IMO 9399222
11,400 TEU 2011
6.5
B
561 ARGUS
IMO 9262716
6,492 TEU 2004
6.5
B
563 VIENNA EXPRESS
IMO 9450416
8,600 TEU 2010
6.5
B
564 MSC RAYSHMI
IMO 9785457
12,200 TEU 2021
6.5
B
565 APL BOSTON
IMO 9597496
9,200 TEU 2013
6.5
B
566 ANTHEA Y
IMO 9710244
9,000 TEU 2015
6.5
B
569 SAN FERNANDO
IMO 9698642
8,714 TEU 2015
6.5
B
568 EDITH MAERSK
IMO 9321548
11,000 TEU 2004
6.5
B
567 MSC EVEREST VIII
IMO 9286231
7,747 TEU 2004
6.5
B
570 CMA CGM SINTRA
IMO 9961362
2,000 TEU 2024
6.5
B
572 GUNVOR MAERSK
IMO 9302891
6,600 TEU 2005
6.5
B
571 CSCL VENUS
IMO 9467251
13,300 TEU 2011
6.5
B
574 MSC VITTORIA
IMO 9299551
8,034 TEU 2006
6.5
B
576 CHICAGO EXPRESS
IMO 9295268
8,235 TEU 2006
6.5
B
573 CMA CGM TANYA
IMO 9722704
9,894 TEU 2016
6.5
B
575 MSC DOMITILLE
IMO 9720201
9,400 TEU 2015
6.5
B
577 COSCO JAPAN
IMO 9448748
8,500 TEU 2010
6.5
B
578 MSC VILDA X
IMO 9146479
7,226 TEU 1998
6.5
B
579 ONE HANOI
IMO 9588093
8,974 TEU 2013
6.5
B
580 CMA CGM RHONE
IMO 9674543
9,365 TEU 2015
6.5
B
582 SANTA INES
IMO 9444845
7,114 TEU 2012
6.5
B
581 ZIM CONDOR
IMO 9960552
5,300 TEU 2024
6.5
B
584 MSC ESTHI
IMO 9304411
9,200 TEU 2006
6.5
B
583 TUBUL
IMO 9447873
8,000 TEU 2011
6.5
B
588 DALIAN EXPRESS
IMO 9229829
7,506 TEU 2001
6.5
B
587 PRAGUE EXPRESS
IMO 9450399
8,600 TEU 2010
6.5
B
586 MSC CANDICE
IMO 9339284
9,200 TEU 2007
6.5
B
585 PANDA 006
IMO 9677026
6,900 TEU 2013
6.5
B
589 TORRENTE
IMO 9447914
8,000 TEU 2011
6.6
B
591 MSC ELAINE
IMO 9393321
8,562 TEU 2009
6.6
B
590 MAERSK STADELHORN
IMO 9726671
9,962 TEU 2015
6.6
B
592 MSC SHREYA B
IMO 9778105
11,000 TEU 2017
6.6
B
593 MSC ALEXA
IMO 9129873
3,500 TEU 1996
6.6
B
596 EUGEN MAERSK
IMO 9321550
11,000 TEU 2004
6.6
B
595 MAERSK TUKANG
IMO 9334686
8,100 TEU 2008
6.6
B
594 YANTIAN EXPRESS
IMO 9229831
7,179 TEU 2002
6.6
B
598 MSC MAEVA
IMO 9289128
8,034 TEU 2005
6.6
B
597 ELLY MAERSK
IMO 9321536
11,000 TEU 2007
6.6
B
600 NINGBO EXPRESS
IMO 9229843
7,179 TEU 2002
6.6
B
599 MSC NOA
IMO 9398228
6,500 TEU 2009
6.6
B
Page 12 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.