Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,610 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-9% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1596 MILAS
IMO 9279379
50,316 2004
4.4
C
1595 BALTIC MANTIS
IMO 9729489
64,000 2015
4.4
C
1606 KINLING
IMO 9893814
37,391 2022
4.4
C
1608 BRIGITTE
IMO 9730270
59,000 2013
4.4
C
1605 LOLITA
IMO 1014979
40,420 2024
4.4
C
1609 BBG MASTER
IMO 9721982
63,650 2016
4.4
C
1604 SHENG JI HAI
IMO 9533050
56,915 2010
4.4
C
1603 GIORGAKIS
IMO 9469510
79,791 2011
4.4
C
1607 TOKYO PIONEER
IMO 9856294
63,686 2020
4.4
C
1611 EVA LONDON
IMO 9863857
63,683 2021
4.4
C
1610 PACIFIC STAR
IMO 9470387
74,138 2013
4.4
C
1614 DARYA TIANA
IMO 9720316
63,491 2015
4.4
C
1616 ROSSANA
IMO 9696838
39,935 2016
4.4
C
1613 KENNADI
IMO 9703576
63,262 2016
4.4
C
1618 EFFY N
IMO 9509516
55,804 2009
4.4
C
1617 BUENA VENTURA I
IMO 9539248
83,366 2011
4.4
C
1612 COURAGEOUS
IMO 9324617
52,346 2005
4.4
C
1615 BULK COURAGEOUS
IMO 9659919
61,393 2013
4.4
C
1620 MANDARIN HANTONG
IMO 9569956
56,741 2011
4.4
C
1622 XIN HAI TONG 20
IMO 9534145
56,753 2009
4.4
C
1619 KONSTANTINOS II
IMO 9595278
81,698 2013
4.4
C
1623 SAGAR SAMRAT
IMO 9727041
76,404 2015
4.4
C
1621 PROPEL SHAKTI
IMO 9640592
58,642 2012
4.4
C
1631 VIKTOR TSOI
IMO 9609744
74,559 2010
4.4
C
1630 KOBE HARMONY
IMO 9926087
39,884 2022
4.4
C
1629 LUYANG SMOOTH
IMO 9538763
75,618 2011
4.4
C
1628 CLARA
IMO 9389124
56,557 2008
4.4
C
1627 GREAT INTELLIGENCE
IMO 9800623
38,797 2017
4.4
C
1626 HARTLAUB
IMO 9977957
39,600 2024
4.4
C
1625 SPRING COSMOS
IMO 9666027
63,273 2014
4.4
C
1624 MERCHIA
IMO 9702493
64,000 2015
4.4
C
1635 DESERT CHALLENGER
IMO 9699842
61,146 2013
4.4
C
1634 NORSE HOUSTON
IMO 9909675
40,020 2021
4.4
C
1636 YUE GUAN FENG
IMO 9523158
75,581 2010
4.4
C
1633 BARROW ISLAND
IMO 9610743
58,044 2010
4.4
C
1640 ANNA-ELISABETH
IMO 9407471
55,709 2008
4.4
C
1638 AGRAFA
IMO 9947304
63,564 2024
4.4
C
1637 SANTA CAROLINA
IMO 9800398
61,195 2018
4.4
C
1632 OCEAN AMBITION
IMO 9883364
63,224 2020
4.4
C
1639 ZHONG YUAN
IMO 9576272
81,629 2011
4.4
C
1650 YOUNG GLORY
IMO 9690133
63,567 2015
4.5
C
1649 LYCAVITOS
IMO 9368857
58,786 2007
4.5
C
1648 THERESA HEBEI
IMO 9591832
81,707 2012
4.5
C
1647 AMSTEL TIGER
IMO 9434515
60,454 2016
4.5
C
1646 HTK NEW SKY
IMO 9708746
58,078 2014
4.5
C
1645 FEDERAL POWER
IMO 9926051
42,692 2022
4.5
C
1644 STAR LUTAS
IMO 9712709
61,347 2016
4.5
C
1643 AL MAQAM
IMO 9672040
63,155 2014
4.5
C
1642 MEDI PERTH
IMO 9804552
60,399 2017
4.5
C
1641 ALERCE
IMO 9942043
37,967 2015
4.5
C
Page 33 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.