Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#541 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-24% greener
B

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 LADY MARIELLA
IMO 9644433
39,316 2013
6.9
B
502 DDELPHINUS 12
IMO 9359375
46,011 2010
6.9
B
503 LADYBUG
IMO 9391385
37,527 2008
6.9
B
504 MONARCH
IMO 9461661
49,999 2011
6.9
B
505 MARQUETTE
IMO 9732785
37,596 2016
6.9
B
507 STORE BAY
IMO 9733698
30,711 2015
6.9
B
506 NCC SHAMS
IMO 9459010
45,468 2012
6.9
B
510 MEDALTA ADVENTURER
IMO 9761451
30,727 2015
6.9
B
509 INTERMEZZO
IMO 9804825
37,328 2019
6.9
B
508 BOW ELM
IMO 9388302
46,098 2011
6.9
B
511 HAFNIA TURQUOISE
IMO 9753674
49,516 2014
7.0
B
512 BOW LIND
IMO 9388314
46,047 2011
7.0
B
513 HAFNIA VIOLETTE
IMO 9690626
49,126 2015
7.0
B
514 MRC NAZENDE
IMO 9419735
51,291 2009
7.0
B
515 FAUSKANGER
IMO 9387700
46,180 2009
7.0
B
516 MARLIN AMMOLITE
IMO 9697246
49,999 2016
7.0
B
517 STOLT COURAGE
IMO 9296731
32,858 2004
7.0
B
519 RED GARNET
IMO 9694359
49,999 2015
7.0
B
518 ARDMORE ENDURANCE
IMO 9654567
49,365 2013
7.0
B
520 VALLE SOLE
IMO 9635781
49,999 2013
7.0
B
521 MANDAL
IMO 9732773
37,596 2016
7.0
B
522 BOW FLORA
IMO 9143207
37,369 1998
7.0
B
524 STENA IMPECCABLE
IMO 9693020
49,737 2017
7.0
B
523 PTI NILE
IMO 9747338
49,999 2014
7.0
B
525 GRANDE RIVIERE
IMO 9733686
30,732 2015
7.0
B
527 SC SCORPIO
IMO 9801079
40,964 2017
7.0
B
526 MERAPI
IMO 9430167
46,872 2006
7.0
B
528 JIPRO NEFTIS
IMO 9459292
34,858 2011
7.0
B
529 IONIAN SEA
IMO 9322384
48,315 2005
7.1
B
531 VINJERAC
IMO 9489194
49,999 2011
7.1
B
530 STENA IMPRESSION
IMO 9667461
49,776 2015
7.1
B
532 NCC QASSIM
IMO 9306811
46,038 2006
7.1
B
533 ASPROUDA
IMO 9478729
74,011 2006
7.1
B
534 CIELO DI SALERNO
IMO 9717292
39,309 2016
7.1
B
535 DIVA
IMO 9760548
37,296 2017
7.1
B
536 NCC NAJEM
IMO 9459022
45,499 2012
7.1
B
538 AQUADISIAC
IMO 9396713
50,695 2008
7.1
B
537 NAVIG8 EXCEL
IMO 9973901
49,127 2024
7.1
B
539 STOLT APAL
IMO 9719240
32,798 2016
7.1
B
540 SOLAR SHERIDAN
IMO 9877652
25,039 2018
7.1
B
542 LINUS P
IMO 9749350
32,247 2014
7.1
B
543 VELEBIT
IMO 9455741
49,999 2011
7.1
B
541 AMIF
IMO 9396373
40,429 2008
7.1
B
544 BOW TRAJECTORY
IMO 9669873
49,622 2014
7.1
B
545 BRISTOL TRADER
IMO 9737101
35,863 2016
7.2
B
546 TG CRAB
IMO 9400394
33,624 2009
7.2
B
550 HENG HUI YONG WANG
IMO 9294288
34,614 2004
7.2
B
549 BOW HERCULES
IMO 9752046
40,847 2017
7.2
B
548 STOLT PONDO
IMO 9374521
33,232 2007
7.2
B
547 SKYLIGHT
IMO 9396737
50,927 2008
7.2
B
Page 11 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.