Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,797 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-4% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 DESERT CHALLENGER
IMO 9699842
61,146 2017
4.5
C
1752 JERA
IMO 9610884
57,111 2012
4.5
C
1753 CETUS SPADE
IMO 9731406
43,343 2018
4.5
C
1754 JABAL SAMHAN
IMO 9699294
63,657 2015
4.5
C
1755 TOMINI HARMONY
IMO 9718131
63,591 2015
4.5
C
1756 MAHA TANAYA
IMO 9591181
83,987 2013
4.5
C
1757 NORSE VERACRUZ
IMO 9972048
40,025 2024
4.5
C
1758 SJ COLOMBO
IMO 9478511
55,989 2010
4.5
C
1759 BUNUN XCEL
IMO 9959307
39,697 2023
4.5
C
1760 REX
IMO 9575163
63,301 2012
4.5
C
1761 SPRING OASIS
IMO 9666039
63,290 2014
4.5
C
1762 ROTTERDAM PEARL V
IMO 9557135
58,000 2010
4.5
C
1763 CETUS ORCA
IMO 9670767
43,494 2015
4.5
C
1764 EIHWAZ
IMO 9729544
63,166 2015
4.5
C
1765 EPTALOFOS
IMO 9343869
92,567 2007
4.5
C
1766 BEATRICE
IMO 9430818
55,700 2009
4.5
C
1767 SKYFALL
IMO 9724752
63,057 2016
4.5
C
1768 ZEA
IMO 9628087
81,425 2013
4.5
C
1769 MILIN KAMAK
IMO 9841641
47,087 2020
4.5
C
1770 PAVIDA NAREE
IMO 9649885
35,340 2018
4.5
C
1771 MERCURY SKY
IMO 9796949
61,569 2017
4.5
C
1772 ASTRO MEROPE
IMO 9700196
63,628 2015
4.5
C
1773 HARMONY
IMO 9994802
39,928 2024
4.5
C
1774 ROSTRUM AFRICA
IMO 9910363
40,010 2022
4.5
C
1775 STAR ROTTERDAM
IMO 9721994
63,629 2017
4.5
C
1776 GUO HAI LIAN 665
IMO 9591492
75,491 2013
4.5
C
1777 BULK SPIRIT
IMO 9355501
52,950 2009
4.5
C
1778 CAPE GRECO
IMO 9481477
79,452 2011
4.5
C
1779 STELLA L
IMO 9500687
58,096 2012
4.5
C
1780 SHEERNESS
IMO 9991616
40,510 2025
4.5
C
1781 OCEANLADY
IMO 9641364
56,715 2013
4.5
C
1782 MEDI CABOTO
IMO 9806770
61,123 2017
4.5
C
1783 CELESTIAL BLUE
IMO 9885439
61,197 2020
4.5
C
1784 JABAL AL KAWR
IMO 9732943
63,581 2014
4.5
C
1785 SEA EAGLE
IMO 9830135
40,079 2019
4.5
C
1786 HECTOR
IMO 9502635
75,200 2012
4.5
C
1787 STAR APUS
IMO 9698795
63,123 2014
4.5
C
1788 XIN HAI TONG 9
IMO 9741578
48,939 2015
4.5
C
1789 VICTORIA T
IMO 9817511
61,266 2017
4.5
C
1790 ROSTRUM AMERICA
IMO 9910351
40,007 2022
4.5
C
1791 AL WATHBA
IMO 9663233
63,672 2013
4.5
C
1792 THOR MAGNHILD
IMO 9303041
56,023 2006
4.5
C
1793 STAR SHANGHAI
IMO 9743588
63,438 2016
4.5
C
1794 DEJIMA
IMO 9860594
63,533 2019
4.5
C
1795 OCEAN HARVEST
IMO 9747467
55,863 2016
4.5
C
1796 GLYFADA
IMO 9714733
60,414 2013
4.5
C
1797 XIN HAI TONG 25
IMO 9632789
56,516 2012
4.5
C
1798 BIRDIE
IMO 9726243
60,269 2015
4.5
C
1799 BUBBA BOOSH
IMO 9674218
55,464 2014
4.5
C
1800 HAWK S
IMO 1082782
40,576 2025
4.5
C
Page 36 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.