Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#35 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-54% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 GCL THAMES
IMO 9966221
182,334 2023
1.7
A
2 SPRING HARMONY
IMO 9983578
182,498 2024
1.8
A
3 HL MERCURY
IMO 9845142
324,993 2019
1.8
A
4 HANNES OLDENDORFF
IMO 9750402
208,962 2013
1.8
A
5 FRONTIER JASMINE
IMO 9933418
182,130 2022
1.9
A
6 SHANDONG DEVELOPMENT
IMO 9911240
207,995 2022
1.9
A
7 MOUNT COOK
IMO 9940344
208,886 2021
1.9
A
8 CAPE PLEASURE
IMO 9960124
182,096 2024
1.9
A
9 GRAND SAKURA
IMO 9913949
181,924 2021
2.0
A
10 SAMJOHN ODYSSEY
IMO 9745940
209,801 2014
2.0
A
11 FRONTIER HOPE
IMO 1028657
182,390 2025
2.0
A
13 GLOBAL BRIGHT
IMO 9714240
207,562 2015
2.0
A
12 SHINWA-MARU
IMO 9325295
297,541 2008
2.0
A
15 FJ ROSSA
IMO 9921611
182,345 2022
2.0
A
14 SPRING CITRUS
IMO 9905215
182,348 2021
2.0
A
17 CAPE OLYMPIA
IMO 9860491
183,057 2020
2.0
A
16 CAMELLIA DREAM
IMO 9568017
206,863 2014
2.0
A
18 BERGE KUJU
IMO 9374040
206,312 2006
2.1
A
20 CAPE CONDOR
IMO 9560390
180,253 2003
2.1
A
19 AM TARANG
IMO 9832913
180,885 2019
2.1
A
21 MOUNT HUA
IMO 9945655
208,479 2021
2.1
A
22 FRONTIER WISH
IMO 1028669
182,454 2025
2.1
A
23 TOMINI K2
IMO 9617519
179,816 2014
2.1
A
24 NAVIOS AMETHYST
IMO 9960148
182,212 2023
2.1
A
25 ORE AMAZONAS
IMO 9565534
297,978 2010
2.1
A
28 CAPE FALCON
IMO 9916202
182,066 2022
2.1
A
29 TOMINI K11
IMO 9860972
208,214 2015
2.1
A
27 SAIKO
IMO 9446087
180,178 2010
2.1
A
26 MINERAL HONSHU
IMO 9614892
181,408 2012
2.1
A
30 DOUBLE STAR
IMO 9479228
206,565 2011
2.1
A
31 GH FITZGERALD
IMO 9558218
180,694 2013
2.1
A
32 BERGE ATLAS
IMO 9439113
180,180 2008
2.1
A
33 ORE SALVADOR
IMO 9607045
297,125 2013
2.1
A
34 HELGA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9713040
209,171 2013
2.2
A
36 NAVIOS ASTRA
IMO 9938614
182,393 2022
2.2
A
35 CAROUGE
IMO 9933080
182,080 2023
2.2
A
37 OCEAN CREST
IMO 9446520
181,494 2010
2.2
A
38 CAPE KESTREL
IMO 9767510
181,267 2016
2.2
A
39 ROYAL ARGO
IMO 9860489
182,883 2020
2.2
A
40 BERGE NIMBA
IMO 9467677
175,949 2006
2.2
A
41 NAVIOS ARMONIA
IMO 9925813
182,079 2022
2.2
A
42 HUBERTUS OLDENDORFF
IMO 9731602
208,994 2013
2.2
A
44 ALICE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9942720
181,963 2022
2.2
A
43 MILLIE
IMO 9492103
180,311 2009
2.2
A
45 ARIADNE
IMO 9721877
207,520 2016
2.2
A
49 GOLDEN ASO
IMO 9701334
182,472 2013
2.2
A
48 SHANDONG NEW ERA
IMO 9910753
207,999 2022
2.2
A
46 BULK SANTOS
IMO 9849772
208,445 2015
2.2
A
47 MH PHOENIX BEAUTY
IMO 9455894
169,151 2010
2.2
A
50 SENORITA
IMO 9284257
56,029 2005
2.2
A
Page 1 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.