Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,672 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1652 AL MAQAM
IMO 9672040
63,155 2014
4.5
C
1651 YOUNG GLORY
IMO 9690133
63,567 2015
4.5
C
1650 HTK NEW SKY
IMO 9708746
58,078 2014
4.5
C
1649 LYCAVITOS
IMO 9368857
58,786 2007
4.5
C
1644 THOR INSUVI
IMO 9298533
52,489 2005
4.5
C
1656 REGNO MARINUS
IMO 9343467
54,238 2008
4.5
C
1661 INTREPID
IMO 9324629
52,346 2005
4.5
C
1660 THOR COURAGE
IMO 9440978
58,693 2009
4.5
C
1659 MIRELA
IMO 9730218
58,721 2015
4.5
C
1658 JABAL HARIM
IMO 9722053
63,277 2016
4.5
C
1657 HIROSHIMA STAR
IMO 9770567
81,789 2017
4.5
C
1663 AMIS BRAVE
IMO 9667459
61,467 2013
4.5
C
1662 KOBAYASHI MARU
IMO 9847011
60,397 2019
4.5
C
1664 TRITON
IMO 9642356
75,009 2012
4.5
C
1667 CLIPPER IRIS
IMO 9720964
63,550 2016
4.5
C
1666 PANEMORFI
IMO 9660097
61,430 2013
4.5
C
1665 KRISTINITA
IMO 9520936
58,110 2011
4.5
C
1670 ZH ZHONG XING
IMO 9710892
61,122 2014
4.5
C
1669 CEDAR
IMO 9403035
58,802 2008
4.5
C
1671 KYZIKOS
IMO 9343845
92,598 2007
4.5
C
1668 NING JING HAI
IMO 9751327
63,573 2017
4.5
C
1673 FLORENTIA
IMO 9714666
63,340 2016
4.5
C
1672 PIAVIA
IMO 9570864
93,296 2011
4.5
C
1674 FENG HE HAI
IMO 9747522
63,244 2016
4.5
C
1676 CL XUCHANG
IMO 9943578
61,203 2021
4.5
C
1675 FANEROMENI
IMO 9343857
92,484 2007
4.5
C
1678 BELITA
IMO 9762857
60,479 2014
4.5
C
1677 HSL MEXICO
IMO 9897561
61,167 2020
4.5
C
1679 SAKIZAYA ORCHID
IMO 9811036
81,588 2017
4.5
C
1684 SOKO ISLAND
IMO 9615169
61,498 2012
4.5
C
1688 CAGLA
IMO 9375953
32,067 2008
4.5
C
1683 PACIFIC HARMONY
IMO 9668271
38,139 2013
4.5
C
1691 PLANA
IMO 9835769
47,096 2019
4.5
C
1690 ATLANTIC ELM
IMO 9558244
58,028 2012
4.5
C
1689 PANDA
IMO 9748277
34,960 2018
4.5
C
1682 APAGEON
IMO 9278870
52,483 2005
4.5
C
1687 CAPE AKAMAS
IMO 9481453
79,454 2010
4.5
C
1686 JAL MURARI
IMO 9849564
81,993 2019
4.5
C
1681 GOOD LUCK
IMO 9492517
75,031 2011
4.5
C
1680 CL CENTURY
IMO 9715816
60,319 2015
4.5
C
1685 SAPPHIRE X
IMO 9621132
56,734 2013
4.5
C
1700 HORUS
IMO 9635690
80,505 2012
4.5
C
1699 KERKYRA
IMO 9607162
81,375 2012
4.5
C
1698 PACIFIC ADVANCE
IMO 9712515
63,507 2015
4.5
C
1697 SOUTHPORT EAGLE
IMO 9575228
63,301 2013
4.5
C
1696 FIRST SKY
IMO 9782247
63,452 2017
4.5
C
1695 OKOLCHITSA
IMO 9841653
47,087 2020
4.5
C
1694 SKATZOURA
IMO 9566954
56,795 2011
4.5
C
1693 ELENI M
IMO 9228033
50,992 2001
4.5
C
1692 EVA MASTER
IMO 9932139
40,242 2022
4.5
C
Page 34 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.