Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,671 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1650 STAR LUTAS
IMO 9712709
61,347 2016
4.5
C
1646 ASTRO SANISTRA
IMO 9805661
60,365 2018
4.5
C
1647 AMSTEL TIGER
IMO 9434515
60,454 2016
4.5
C
1660 HIROSHIMA STAR
IMO 9770567
81,789 2017
4.5
C
1659 JABAL HARIM
IMO 9722053
63,277 2016
4.5
C
1658 REGNO MARINUS
IMO 9343467
54,238 2008
4.5
C
1657 MIRELA
IMO 9730218
58,721 2015
4.5
C
1656 INTREPID
IMO 9324629
52,346 2005
4.5
C
1655 THOR COURAGE
IMO 9440978
58,693 2009
4.5
C
1654 HERMES
IMO 9613056
75,073 2012
4.5
C
1662 CLIPPER IRIS
IMO 9720964
63,550 2016
4.5
C
1661 PANEMORFI
IMO 9660097
61,430 2013
4.5
C
1666 KOBAYASHI MARU
IMO 9847011
60,397 2019
4.5
C
1665 KRISTINITA
IMO 9520936
58,110 2011
4.5
C
1664 TRITON
IMO 9642356
75,009 2012
4.5
C
1663 AMIS BRAVE
IMO 9667459
61,467 2013
4.5
C
1668 NING JING HAI
IMO 9751327
63,573 2017
4.5
C
1667 CEDAR
IMO 9403035
58,802 2008
4.5
C
1669 ZH ZHONG XING
IMO 9710892
61,122 2014
4.5
C
1670 KYZIKOS
IMO 9343845
92,598 2007
4.5
C
1671 FLORENTIA
IMO 9714666
63,340 2016
4.5
C
1672 BELITA
IMO 9762857
60,479 2017
4.5
C
1674 FANEROMENI
IMO 9343857
92,485 2007
4.5
C
1673 HSL MEXICO
IMO 9897561
61,167 2020
4.5
C
1677 FENG HE HAI
IMO 9747522
63,244 2016
4.5
C
1676 PIAVIA
IMO 9570864
93,296 2011
4.5
C
1675 CL XUCHANG
IMO 9943578
61,203 2021
4.5
C
1682 PLANA
IMO 9835769
47,096 2019
4.5
C
1684 SOKO ISLAND
IMO 9615169
61,498 2012
4.5
C
1681 SAPPHIRE X
IMO 9621132
56,734 2013
4.5
C
1689 ATLANTIC ELM
IMO 9558244
58,028 2012
4.5
C
1688 CAPE AKAMAS
IMO 9481453
79,454 2006
4.5
C
1680 PANDA
IMO 9748277
34,960 2018
4.5
C
1687 PACIFIC HARMONY
IMO 9668271
38,139 2013
4.5
C
1686 SAKIZAYA ORCHID
IMO 9811036
81,588 2017
4.5
C
1685 APAGEON
IMO 9278870
52,483 2005
4.5
C
1679 GOOD LUCK
IMO 9492517
75,015 2011
4.5
C
1678 JAL MURARI
IMO 9849564
81,993 2019
4.5
C
1683 CL CENTURY
IMO 9715816
60,319 2015
4.5
C
1690 CAGLA
IMO 9375953
32,067 2008
4.5
C
1698 FIRST SKY
IMO 9782247
63,452 2017
4.5
C
1699 SOUTHPORT EAGLE
IMO 9575228
63,301 2013
4.5
C
1697 SKATZOURA
IMO 9566954
56,795 2011
4.5
C
1696 HORUS
IMO 9635690
80,505 2012
4.5
C
1695 KERKYRA
IMO 9607162
81,375 2010
4.5
C
1694 EVA MASTER
IMO 9932139
40,242 2022
4.5
C
1693 PACIFIC ADVANCE
IMO 9712515
63,507 2015
4.5
C
1692 GHALA
IMO 9687069
50,409 2013
4.5
C
1691 ELENI M
IMO 9228033
50,992 2001
4.5
C
1700 LETIZIA OETKER
IMO 9731717
61,288 2015
4.5
C
Page 34 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.