Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,238 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+8% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2201 NORDSEINE
IMO 9596052
38,036 2015
5.0
D
2202 STAR CHALLENGER
IMO 9632997
61,462 2012
5.0
D
2203 URSA MINOR
IMO 9711767
40,097 2013
5.0
D
2204 AFRICAN NIGHTHAWK
IMO 9646895
40,481 2014
5.1
D
2205 HUPEH
IMO 9714264
39,773 2016
5.1
D
2206 ROSTRUM SOLAR
IMO 9941623
40,071 2024
5.1
D
2207 WADI ALKARM
IMO 9460760
80,533 2011
5.1
D
2208 HONG RUN 16
IMO 9317420
52,905 2006
5.1
D
2209 BERGE BEN NEVIS
IMO 9782974
37,681 2017
5.1
D
2210 NAFISA JAHAN
IMO 9303091
56,070 2006
5.1
D
2211 AFRICAN GANNET
IMO 9749233
37,806 2018
5.1
D
2212 BC MIRABEL
IMO 9531662
58,186 2013
5.1
D
2213 PAN QUEEN
IMO 9487419
56,933 2011
5.1
D
2214 MED LIGURIA
IMO 9604811
51,156 2012
5.1
D
2215 ROSTRUM HAMBURG
IMO 9997268
40,012 2024
5.1
D
2216 KRAIT
IMO 9622837
56,100 2013
5.1
D
2217 PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9979474
40,547 2024
5.1
D
2218 BLUE FIN
IMO 9607277
56,780 2011
5.1
D
2219 LIBRA-XS
IMO 9282742
52,441 2003
5.1
D
2220 MANDARIN CHINA
IMO 9569243
56,778 2011
5.1
D
2221 LUCKY BELLA
IMO 9286970
76,263 2005
5.1
D
2222 GREY LUNA
IMO 9578775
56,697 2011
5.1
D
2223 LALLY SCHULTE
IMO 9725897
43,457 2017
5.1
D
2224 STAR HARRIER
IMO 9941544
40,393 2022
5.1
D
2225 CRANE
IMO 9441283
57,809 2010
5.1
D
2226 SETO HARMONY
IMO 9881160
39,943 2020
5.1
D
2227 DENSA EAGLE
IMO 9432488
55,089 2006
5.1
D
2228 SUPER RICE
IMO 9621792
56,615 2013
5.1
D
2229 MAI TAI
IMO 9709221
38,792 2015
5.1
D
2230 FEDERAL MICHIGAN
IMO 9975416
34,763 2024
5.1
D
2231 KAMARI
IMO 9412634
53,822 2011
5.1
D
2232 SPAR CAPELLA
IMO 9490844
58,000 2011
5.1
D
2233 SIDER VANCOUVER
IMO 9919541
37,722 2022
5.1
D
2234 NORD NORFOLK
IMO 9984479
40,232 2024
5.1
D
2235 CRIMSON SAPPHIRE
IMO 1014163
40,435 2024
5.1
D
2236 ILIANA
IMO 9490715
58,018 2010
5.1
D
2237 EUCALYPTUS
IMO 9832456
36,896 2019
5.1
D
2238 LINK AMICI
IMO 9728394
34,398 2015
5.1
D
2239 SIDER HARMONY
IMO 9780964
38,581 2020
5.1
D
2240 MYKONOS SEAS
IMO 9491240
56,840 2011
5.1
D
2241 SEACON 7
IMO 9487665
56,880 2012
5.1
D
2242 SILVER LADY
IMO 9279367
50,329 2003
5.1
D
2243 YANGZE 35
IMO 9617600
47,091 2011
5.1
D
2244 MEDITERRANEAN SPIRIT
IMO 9725407
38,858 2016
5.1
D
2245 OCEAN PERA
IMO 9712955
55,837 2015
5.1
D
2246 PORT SHANGHAI
IMO 9423528
58,600 2009
5.1
D
2247 REIWA BREEZE
IMO 9757802
37,721 2016
5.1
D
2248 LEFKADA
IMO 9767546
37,951 2016
5.1
D
2249 WU YANG FORTUNE
IMO 9294214
52,050 2004
5.1
D
2250 PAPA JOHN
IMO 9555149
56,543 2010
5.1
D
Page 45 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.