Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#461 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
-48% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,477 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
450 MAERSK CINCINNATI
IMO 9936410
15,500 TEU 2024
5.1
B
452 EVER MEGA
IMO 9935260
15,500 TEU 2021
5.1
B
453 COSCO EXCELLENCE
IMO 9472189
13,092 TEU 2012
5.1
B
455 MAJESTIC MAERSK
IMO 9619919
18,270 TEU 2013
5.1
B
456 MSC TARANTO
IMO 9475258
14,000 TEU 2011
5.1
B
454 EVER GRADE
IMO 9820855
20,000 TEU 2019
5.1
B
457 MSC TRIESTE
IMO 9484479
13,050 TEU 2011
5.1
B
460 CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE
IMO 9702156
17,722 TEU 2015
5.1
B
459 MSC ISTANBUL
IMO 9606326
16,652 TEU 2015
5.1
B
458 MAERSK ESSEN
IMO 9456783
13,100 TEU 2010
5.1
B
461 AL JASRAH
IMO 9732321
15,000 TEU 2016
5.1
B
464 APL LION CITY
IMO 9631967
13,892 TEU 2013
5.1
B
466 EVER GIFTED
IMO 9786827
20,000 TEU 2018
5.1
B
463 MSC DILETTA
IMO 9897004
23,656 TEU 2021
5.1
B
467 YM TIPTOP
IMO 9860946
12,690 TEU 2021
5.1
B
462 CMA CGM CENTAURUS
IMO 9410777
11,400 TEU 2010
5.1
B
465 AL DAHNA EXPRESS
IMO 9708825
18,691 TEU 2016
5.1
B
468 MSC VALERIA
IMO 9461439
14,000 TEU 2012
5.1
B
470 HMM HANBADA
IMO 9869203
14,000 TEU 2021
5.1
B
469 MAERSK SERANGOON
IMO 9315214
5,648 TEU 2007
5.1
B
475 HMM HOPE
IMO 9637234
13,154 TEU 2014
5.2
B
474 YM WIND
IMO 9708461
14,198 TEU 2017
5.2
B
473 HYUNDAI EARTH
IMO 9725110
10,055 TEU 2016
5.2
B
472 COSCO GLORY
IMO 9466245
13,092 TEU 2011
5.2
B
471 PANAMA EXPRESS
IMO 9641223
6,900 TEU 2013
5.2
B
476 MSC GABON
IMO 9974539
8,300 TEU 2025
5.2
B
478 AFIF
IMO 9732345
15,000 TEU 2017
5.2
B
477 AL DHAIL
IMO 9732307
15,000 TEU 2016
5.2
B
479 CMA CGM JULES VERNE
IMO 9454450
16,022 TEU 2013
5.2
B
484 HYUNDAI NEPTUNE
IMO 9725158
10,000 TEU 2016
5.2
B
482 SEASPAN BEYOND
IMO 9739678
10,100 TEU 2016
5.2
B
485 MSC VANDYA
IMO 9484467
13,050 TEU 2012
5.2
B
481 MEXICO EXPRESS
IMO 9686900
6,428 TEU 2015
5.2
B
483 OOCL MALAYSIA
IMO 9627980
13,200 TEU 2011
5.2
B
480 EVER GREET
IMO 9832729
20,150 TEU 2019
5.2
B
486 COSCO SHIPPING SAKURA
IMO 9785794
13,500 TEU 2018
5.2
B
487 EVER GLORY
IMO 9786839
20,000 TEU 2019
5.2
B
490 MSC AURIGA
IMO 9857183
15,000 TEU 2020
5.2
B
489 ONE RECOGNITION
IMO 9952701
7,000 TEU 2024
5.2
B
488 CMA CGM OSIRIS
IMO 9882504
15,000 TEU 2021
5.2
B
493 MSC SOFIA
IMO 9927275
14,812 TEU 2023
5.2
B
496 COSCO SHIPPING SCORPIO
IMO 9789635
19,000 TEU 2018
5.2
B
494 YM WINNER
IMO 9684689
14,080 TEU 2015
5.2
B
492 JADE I
IMO 9968059
7,000 TEU 2024
5.2
B
491 SEASPAN BEAUTY
IMO 9713349
10,100 TEU 2015
5.2
B
495 APL SINGAPURA
IMO 9632002
13,892 TEU 2013
5.2
B
499 MSC INGY
IMO 9755945
17,590 TEU 2016
5.2
B
498 MSC SIXIN
IMO 9839301
22,000 TEU 2019
5.2
B
497 YM WELLSPRING
IMO 9757230
13,870 TEU 2019
5.2
B
500 EVER GOVERN
IMO 9832717
20,150 TEU 2019
5.2
B
Page 10 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.