Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#709 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-10% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 NCC YANBU
IMO 9458808
45,553 2010
8.9
C
702 MTM HAMBURG
IMO 9379844
19,997 2008
8.9
C
703 MTM TORTOLA
IMO 9742065
22,396 2016
8.9
C
704 HAFNIA TORRES
IMO 9729283
39,067 2016
8.9
C
705 KATSUYAMA
IMO 9274678
36,809 2005
8.9
C
706 PACIFICO
IMO 9876830
22,554 2022
8.9
C
707 DELPHI
IMO 9283796
37,432 2004
8.9
C
708 MTM SAVANNAH
IMO 9726750
22,430 2015
8.9
C
709 ARDMORE CHEYENNE
IMO 9707857
25,217 2013
8.9
C
710 BHARAT
IMO 9253595
40,128 2003
8.9
C
711 HTM WARRIOR
IMO 9399911
50,576 2009
8.9
C
712 BLUE ROSE
IMO 9335915
38,402 2007
8.9
C
713 BERNICE
IMO 9220926
42,721 2001
9.0
C
714 CHEM RANGER
IMO 9490296
26,198 2010
9.0
C
715 EK-STREAM
IMO 9808261
19,881 2018
9.0
C
716 SAKURA BELLE
IMO 9568500
26,960 2011
9.0
C
717 FAIRCHEM ALDEBARAN
IMO 9552666
19,697 2017
9.0
C
718 FAIRCHEM TRIUMPH
IMO 9758038
22,354 2017
9.1
C
719 FAIRCHEM SUCCESS
IMO 9758090
22,346 2017
9.1
C
720 CHEM NEON
IMO 9815264
19,972 2018
9.1
C
721 PORTARIA
IMO 9464326
36,677 2007
9.1
C
722 MOUNT EVEREST
IMO 9470985
37,817 2010
9.1
C
723 ALFRED N
IMO 9749324
25,161 2014
9.1
C
724 EASTERLY CANYON
IMO 9383974
36,677 2009
9.1
C
725 STOLT TENACITY
IMO 9680102
38,907 2017
9.1
C
726 EASTERLY SIRIUS
IMO 9455052
36,677 2010
9.1
C
727 BOW JAGUAR
IMO 9989209
25,877 2024
9.1
C
728 MTM AMSTERDAM
IMO 9776444
21,176 2018
9.2
C
729 CIELO DI CAPRI
IMO 9717278
39,043 2016
9.2
C
730 SFL ARUBA
IMO 9919761
33,325 2022
9.2
C
731 BOURDA
IMO 9252448
47,323 2003
9.2
C
732 PS VANCOUVER
IMO 9379337
50,922 2007
9.2
C
733 RF STELLA
IMO 9580998
19,132 2011
9.2
C
734 NOREASTER
IMO 9350642
37,412 2007
9.2
C
735 STOLT BISMUTH
IMO 9739290
27,570 2016
9.2
C
736 TRUST GALAXY
IMO 9860192
21,020 2019
9.2
C
737 GINGA LIGER
IMO 9893448
25,064 2021
9.2
C
738 PROSPERO
IMO 9876828
22,543 2021
9.3
C
739 GINGA OCELOT
IMO 9581423
26,063 2013
9.3
C
740 STOLT ACER
IMO 9272668
29,709 2004
9.3
C
741 FAIRCHEM MAKO
IMO 9826574
25,170 2018
9.3
C
742 ZAGARA
IMO 9231171
37,320 2002
9.3
C
743 GULF FANATIR
IMO 9359868
45,920 2008
9.3
C
744 LOYAL
IMO 9345881
23,322 2006
9.3
C
745 PRABHU PARVATI
IMO 9423621
19,918 2008
9.3
C
746 CIELO DI GAETA
IMO 9669653
39,990 2014
9.3
C
747 SFL BONAIRE
IMO 9919773
33,338 2023
9.3
C
748 GEORGIA
IMO 9302683
40,327 2006
9.3
C
749 STOLT OCELOT
IMO 9459539
23,324 2008
9.3
C
750 ADARA
IMO 9587829
37,583 2011
9.3
C
Page 15 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.