Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#232 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-41% greener
A

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
201 STI MARSHALL
IMO 9833565
49,999 2019
5.7
A
202 MARITIME VALOR
IMO 9848352
49,998 2021
5.7
A
203 FPMC 34
IMO 9845166
49,781 2019
5.7
A
204 NAVIG8 GRACE
IMO 9833656
49,804 2019
5.7
A
205 BEAGLE
IMO 9814181
49,850 2019
5.7
A
208 ARDMORE SEAVANTAGE
IMO 9637076
47,790 2014
5.7
A
206 SOLAR SALLY
IMO 9898498
49,314 2021
5.7
A
207 STENA IMPRIMIS
IMO 9797395
49,718 2017
5.7
A
209 STENA IMMACULATE
IMO 9693018
49,729 2017
5.7
A
212 TORM DAPHNE
IMO 9692313
49,746 2015
5.7
A
211 ELANDRA BALTIC
IMO 9482562
51,406 2011
5.7
A
210 SOLAR CHERYL
IMO 9898503
49,389 2021
5.7
A
213 ALPINE EAGLE
IMO 9366275
51,542 2008
5.7
A
214 BRITISH SAILOR
IMO 9724673
45,999 2016
5.7
A
215 TORM DAGNY
IMO 9692337
49,635 2015
5.7
A
217 SANTIAGO I
IMO 9730347
49,901 2022
5.7
A
216 ARDMORE ENDURANCE
IMO 9654567
49,466 2013
5.7
A
218 HIGH DISCOVERY
IMO 9674725
45,999 2014
5.8
A
222 CLEAROCEAN MARVEL
IMO 9849291
49,995 2019
5.8
A
221 MIDNIGHT GLORY
IMO 9877808
50,322 2019
5.8
A
220 CL EMILY BRONTE
IMO 9943322
49,348 2023
5.8
A
219 MIA GRACE
IMO 9681132
49,990 2014
5.8
A
225 YASA ORION
IMO 9888340
50,215 2021
5.8
A
224 YASA FLAMINGO
IMO 9857236
50,215 2019
5.8
A
226 NORD OCEANIA
IMO 9747120
49,996 2018
5.8
A
223 CL AGATHA CHRISTIE
IMO 9943346
49,327 2023
5.8
A
228 SALACGRIVA
IMO 9323390
52,620 2008
5.8
A
227 HAFNIA KIRSTEN
IMO 9732682
49,999 2017
5.8
A
229 THERESA LIMA
IMO 9946130
49,448 2023
5.8
A
230 MARLIN AZURITE
IMO 9721920
49,999 2016
5.8
A
231 CHEMROAD ORCHID
IMO 9790608
35,703 2019
5.8
A
233 MAGIC CHEMIST
IMO 9707261
49,990 2015
5.8
A
232 MARLIN AMETRINE
IMO 9697234
49,999 2015
5.8
A
235 ST GEORGE
IMO 9412775
50,651 2010
5.8
A
234 COSMIC GLORY
IMO 9877822
50,322 2020
5.8
A
236 SEA ELEPHANT
IMO 9853254
49,929 2019
5.8
A
237 CLEAROCEAN MILANO
IMO 9917658
50,485 2021
5.8
A
238 DORADO
IMO 9801574
50,067 2021
5.8
A
240 QUARTZ
IMO 9681170
49,990 2015
5.8
A
239 MARLIN AMMOLITE
IMO 9697246
49,999 2016
5.8
A
241 HAKATA PRINCESS
IMO 9788564
49,842 2018
5.8
A
242 FPMC 35
IMO 9845178
49,681 2020
5.9
A
243 HAFNIA AQUAMARINE
IMO 9711573
38,506 2013
5.9
A
245 PETITE SOEUR
IMO 9448712
50,420 2011
5.9
A
244 NAVIG8 GAUNTLET
IMO 9853228
49,768 2019
5.9
A
246 T JUNGFRAU
IMO 9389289
52,610 2009
5.9
A
247 HIGH VOYAGER
IMO 9681845
45,999 2014
5.9
A
250 JOSE PROGRESS
IMO 9392391
47,018 2009
5.9
A
249 SEA FRACTUS
IMO 9724609
45,999 2016
5.9
A
248 ELANDRA MELODY
IMO 9676527
50,886 2014
5.9
A
Page 5 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.