Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,066 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+23% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 STOLT SUN
IMO 9149512
22,198 2000
11.3
D
1052 HYDE PARK
IMO 9725861
19,994 2017
11.3
D
1053 MT BANDIRMA
IMO 9120243
9,584 1996
11.3
D
1054 CLYDE
IMO 9298416
12,984 2005
11.3
D
1055 ORIENTAL DAPHNE
IMO 9882736
16,267 2020
11.4
D
1056 PRABHU LAL
IMO 9416044
19,859 2008
11.4
D
1057 TG ARIES
IMO 9485849
19,956 2012
11.4
D
1058 STOLT EFFORT
IMO 9178202
37,155 1999
11.4
D
1059 FG ROTTERDAM
IMO 9485863
19,995 2012
11.4
D
1060 CHEM NEW YORK
IMO 9705732
19,994 2014
11.4
D
1061 DAMSGAARD
IMO 9724453
19,998 2016
11.5
D
1062 TG VIRGO
IMO 9416109
19,954 2009
11.5
D
1063 THERESA GALAXY
IMO 9317195
19,988 2005
11.5
D
1064 GINGA SUNBIRD
IMO 9926568
25,160 2022
11.5
D
1065 UNDA
IMO 9511234
9,087 2009
11.5
D
1066 CHEM HOUSTON
IMO 9705720
19,997 2014
11.5
D
1067 CYGNI
IMO 9427990
14,374 2010
11.6
D
1068 SOLAR SKYLER
IMO 9877640
25,039 2018
11.6
D
1069 RICHMOND PARK
IMO 9624782
21,313 2012
11.6
D
1070 HURON
IMO 9457878
21,224 2010
11.6
D
1071 LOEVSTAKKEN
IMO 9724441
19,995 2015
11.6
D
1072 TRISTAR NATASHA
IMO 9721748
19,801 2016
11.6
D
1073 SIGAIA THERESA
IMO 9748710
12,661 2015
11.6
D
1074 GOLDEN MAPLE
IMO 1055868
18,406 2025
11.6
D
1075 GULLFJELLET
IMO 9724439
19,975 2015
11.6
D
1076 FAIRCHEM ALDEBARAN
IMO 9552666
19,697 2017
11.7
D
1077 CUMBRIAN
IMO 9298404
12,921 2004
11.7
D
1078 MOYRA
IMO 9271999
19,806 2005
11.7
D
1079 THUN LUNDY
IMO 9837872
18,684 2020
11.7
D
1080 MED ATLANTIC
IMO 9410533
26,234 2011
11.8
D
1081 TRANS SEA
IMO 9956927
12,598 2023
11.8
D
1082 WINDSOR
IMO 9542130
19,997 2010
11.8
D
1083 SONGA POLARIS
IMO 9457749
25,145 2011
11.8
D
1084 CHEMICAL MASTER
IMO 9558957
14,298 2009
11.8
D
1085 XANTHIA
IMO 9246152
17,031 2003
11.8
D
1086 EVA FUKUOKA
IMO 9989182
25,298 2024
11.8
D
1087 SOLERO
IMO 9428085
19,992 2009
11.8
D
1088 TERNSUND
IMO 9722390
14,847 2016
11.8
D
1089 ARKOS
IMO 9286827
13,700 2004
11.9
D
1090 STOLT STREAM
IMO 9169940
22,199 2000
11.9
D
1091 LATANA
IMO 9186352
15,990 2000
11.9
D
1092 THUN LONDON
IMO 9828986
18,684 2019
11.9
D
1093 OLYMPIC SPIRIT
IMO 9327097
24,035 2005
11.9
D
1094 YC AZALEA
IMO 9272682
19,997 2004
11.9
D
1095 CHEM MERCURY
IMO 9815276
19,971 2018
11.9
D
1096 CETI
IMO 9427988
14,353 2009
11.9
D
1097 MAGENTA RAY
IMO 9829722
19,998 2019
11.9
D
1098 AMAGI GALAXY
IMO 9490313
26,198 2010
12.0
D
1099 CARPE DIEM
IMO 9428815
25,175 2006
12.0
D
1100 MISTRAL EXPLORER
IMO 9624770
21,323 2012
12.0
D
Page 22 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.