Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,843 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+31% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2801 NAVA ULYSSES
IMO 9602186
34,898 2012
6.0
E
2802 CANADIAN BULKER
IMO 9855422
39,541 2019
6.0
E
2803 SHENG CHENG HAI
IMO 9505481
56,633 2013
6.0
E
2804 LAMBI
IMO 9595254
35,047 2012
6.0
E
2805 IMAVERE
IMO 9612325
36,746 2012
6.0
E
2806 SZCZECIN
IMO 9594224
37,930 2012
6.0
E
2807 DENSA SEA LION
IMO 9649079
36,765 2011
6.0
E
2808 FEDERAL SKEENA
IMO 9595890
37,168 2012
6.0
E
2809 DAIWAN HERO
IMO 9709336
34,376 2016
6.0
E
2810 VELA
IMO 9330628
53,565 2007
6.1
E
2811 TIRYANDAFIL
IMO 9320996
54,243 2007
6.1
E
2812 OCEAN JOY
IMO 9668300
38,114 2013
6.1
E
2813 FEDERAL SAKURA
IMO 9288291
32,583 2005
6.1
E
2814 AFRICAN QUEEN
IMO 9389930
55,000 2007
6.1
E
2815 ZBB SERENITY
IMO 9486570
37,302 2006
6.1
E
2816 COREWISE OL
IMO 9636395
37,059 2013
6.1
E
2817 FILIA
IMO 9490868
58,018 2011
6.1
E
2818 LAGO DI CANCANO
IMO 9659787
37,500 2014
6.1
E
2819 PARALOS
IMO 9325099
30,439 2006
6.1
E
2820 CS CALVINA
IMO 9542532
37,456 2011
6.1
E
2821 AFRICAN STORK
IMO 9733272
40,481 2015
6.1
E
2822 DENSA PUMA
IMO 9649108
36,722 2011
6.1
E
2823 WEST HARMONY
IMO 9665700
38,868 2012
6.1
E
2824 TOP MARINE
IMO 9995351
39,850 2024
6.1
E
2825 MERAKLIS
IMO 9227819
50,283 2001
6.1
E
2826 ABYSSINIAN
IMO 9646728
36,063 2011
6.1
E
2827 ISABELLE G
IMO 9285938
37,193 2004
6.1
E
2828 TOMINI SIROCCO
IMO 9711743
38,780 2016
6.1
E
2829 PRINCESS SHAIMAA
IMO 9620138
32,046 2013
6.1
E
2830 OCCITAN LISTRAC
IMO 9549372
29,142 2009
6.1
E
2831 AFRICAN KALMIA
IMO 9666431
28,148 2016
6.1
E
2832 JALMA TOPIC
IMO 9309655
51,966 2006
6.1
E
2833 ELEOVRYTISSA
IMO 9486594
37,096 2012
6.1
E
2834 JIU HUA HAI
IMO 9466520
53,377 2008
6.1
E
2835 AMIRA SAHAR
IMO 9527958
38,477 2012
6.1
E
2836 AYMAR GALACTIC
IMO 9330630
53,460 2007
6.1
E
2837 SIDER BEAR
IMO 9657856
40,484 2013
6.1
E
2838 FOXTROT
IMO 9580144
38,688 2012
6.1
E
2839 BAHAMA SPIRIT
IMO 9083263
46,606 1995
6.2
E
2840 ODYSSEAS
IMO 9595187
37,138 2011
6.2
E
2841 FEDERAL SWIFT
IMO 9595905
37,140 2012
6.2
E
2842 NISA NAREE
IMO 9700029
39,000 2015
6.2
E
2843 MANSOUR M
IMO 9296274
33,733 2005
6.2
E
2844 CLARABELLE
IMO 9695004
37,430 2014
6.2
E
2845 MEHMET DADAYLI
IMO 9749984
34,484 2019
6.2
E
2846 SEA LADY
IMO 9266188
50,246 2003
6.2
E
2847 DESERT GLORY
IMO 9543691
57,412 2011
6.2
E
2848 KASZUBY
IMO 9346847
38,981 2008
6.2
E
2849 KOSZALIN
IMO 9594236
37,885 2012
6.2
E
2850 GENCO PYRENEES
IMO 9511832
58,018 2010
6.2
E
Page 57 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.