Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,395 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-13% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1343 ULTRA QUALITY
IMO 9866524
63,465 2020
4.0
B
1352 SKIATHOS
IMO 9497402
79,412 2011
4.0
B
1355 GREAT SHANG
IMO 9766906
64,942 2016
4.0
B
1354 AQUAHOLIC
IMO 9363089
83,730 2008
4.0
B
1353 BERGE CATHERINE
IMO 9856309
63,654 2020
4.0
B
1358 DENSA FLAMINGO
IMO 9603283
82,670 2010
4.0
B
1361 XIN HAI TONG 801
IMO 9591844
81,680 2012
4.0
B
1357 XIN HAI TONG 808
IMO 9669330
76,079 2010
4.0
B
1363 ASTRO VEGA
IMO 9720299
63,008 2015
4.0
B
1362 G PACIFIC
IMO 9494010
58,114 2010
4.0
B
1356 XIN HAI TONG 807
IMO 9624122
81,752 2013
4.0
B
1359 STAR PISCES
IMO 9715854
60,916 2015
4.0
B
1360 INES CORRADO
IMO 9602772
81,271 2012
4.0
B
1364 PERSEAS
IMO 9650638
75,033 2013
4.1
B
1365 ABDULLAH
IMO 9745598
58,068 2015
4.1
B
1371 ANGELIC PEACE
IMO 9250177
75,007 1999
4.1
B
1370 TIGER HEBEI
IMO 9712204
63,483 2015
4.1
B
1372 PSARROS D
IMO 9855642
81,961 2019
4.1
B
1369 CHRISTINE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9537898
93,077 2010
4.1
B
1368 HF ZHOUSHAN
IMO 9268992
75,606 2004
4.1
B
1367 ASIAN SUMMIT
IMO 9725005
62,466 2017
4.1
B
1366 STEFANOS T
IMO 9583744
80,499 2011
4.1
B
1376 JAL MURARI
IMO 9849564
81,993 2019
4.1
B
1375 PHILHOKUSAI
IMO 9549451
61,197 2022
4.1
B
1377 XIN HAI TONG 63
IMO 9592721
57,023 2011
4.1
B
1374 FEDERAL TOKORO
IMO 9725445
55,543 2015
4.1
B
1379 YASA JUPITER
IMO 9848132
61,077 2019
4.1
B
1378 STAR ANGELINA
IMO 9310630
82,981 2006
4.1
B
1373 HALONA
IMO 9286920
75,776 2005
4.1
B
1383 EPIC SERENITY
IMO 9935442
82,310 2022
4.1
B
1382 POPI S
IMO 9527233
80,337 2012
4.1
B
1381 TOMINI DESTINY
IMO 9718155
63,590 2017
4.1
B
1380 ZHENG RONG
IMO 9593828
81,793 2013
4.1
B
1384 SUN VIL II
IMO 9643178
56,042 2013
4.1
B
1386 W-SKY
IMO 9476666
92,929 2011
4.1
C
1389 GRETKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9681962
80,444 2015
4.1
C
1392 BUNA ARROW
IMO 9687071
55,967 2014
4.1
C
1388 PAN IMPERIAL
IMO 9699361
63,567 2016
4.1
C
1394 WECO HOLLI
IMO 9929699
61,275 2020
4.1
C
1393 VIENNA
IMO 9403205
58,736 2009
4.1
C
1387 TAHITI ONE
IMO 9597032
81,291 2012
4.1
C
1385 ULTRA INFINITY
IMO 9767481
61,188 2014
4.1
C
1391 AGRAFA
IMO 9947304
63,564 2024
4.1
C
1390 SEVA
IMO 9336000
76,948 2007
4.1
C
1400 AMANI
IMO 9729910
61,436 2016
4.1
C
1399 COMMON ATLAS
IMO 9669378
62,985 2014
4.1
C
1398 MARINA
IMO 9309497
87,036 2006
4.1
C
1397 GLAFKOS
IMO 9696448
63,519 2016
4.1
C
1396 TIGER LILY
IMO 9744984
81,886 2016
4.1
C
1395 HSL KENSINGTON
IMO 9950648
64,452 2023
4.1
C
Page 28 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.